Strat Aero Share Discussion Threads

[loverat] 02/11/2016 17:38

SK

Come on. You can do better than that.

At the very least your posts lack the required precision when commenting on these matters.

Considering that you previously posted that e-mail chain with you threatening that solicitor with reporting to the Law Society (see extract below), I am sure any readers with a working knowledge of law or even a passing interest will make their own mind up what you meant and whether you know what you are talking about.

As I said, I hope your posts on the financials of this company are more accurate - but I don't hold out much hope given your history.

Part of Sweet Karolina's pompous and incorrect e-mail to Penningtons LLP -6/10/2015


'I do not make threats, but as both you and your client are both of the
legal profession, I have now resolved to inform the Law Society of what I
consider to be unreasonable behaviour and harassment upon your part. I
will, in the spirit of openness and reasonableness, copy you on what I
send to the Law Society'.

[sweet karolina] 02/11/2016 16:57

Loveprat,

I never said the Ombudsman awarded me compensation aginst SRA, they can't, they can only recommend it. The Independent Reviewer at Ombudman Services acts as the Ombudsman for SRA and a whole load of other things:



Everyone understands the term Ombudsman, few people would recognise the term independent reviewer. You erroneously assumed I did not know what I was talking about because you assumed I was talking about the legal ombudsman - I was not. It is you who are squirming now because yet again you have tried to twist what has been actually said to discredit the person saying it, but ended up completely discrediting yourself and exposing once again that you have nothing real to add to the debate and all you do is go around smearing people who want to discuss the really important issues facing a company listed on the stock market.

[andy] 02/11/2016 16:44

bygdennis2 Nov '16 - 14:48 - 2958 of 2973 2 0
Hi loverat, I do know Andy is not tied in with our group but he has joined then in everything posted right or wrong, He has lied which is not good and makes out he is right and what he doesn't know is not worth knowing,
Basically he's just a pain in the butt who likes having the last word but doesn't realise when he's mistaken, I've nothing against anyone if they keep it clean but here anything goes, I have tried to give Andy some slack but he just won't listen,

Now as far as i'm concerned he's stuck in mode and can't get out, Cheat lie and anything to have the last word, Even asking me to prove he's not a Liar, He lies and cheats, It can be checked, but not by me, I already know and i don't need to confirm it.
I hope this will be the last of it, It's entirely up to Andy to get things right and think about what he says before posting, I advised him this long ago, He know's and should start again from scratch Do some research with an open mind, Word check what this clever group say and go from there.
Anyway these BB's are about Aero and as they are now, Not where they were, Others should also update themselves but they are the group, Andy just a roadie after a free ride, Of course their aim is to do as much damage here as they can,
Thing is there's nothing they can say now that could be seen as reliable, Just hostile guesses they hope someone who doesn't know better takes notice.


---

You just can't help yourself can you?

You call me a liar yet cannot prove it, because it isn't true!

Why do I need to lie? The truth is all that's needed.

The only lies on the AERO threads emanate from your vile mouth, desperately trying to sucker in new mug punters to raise the share price so you can sell to them and bail out no doubt.

I suggest you go back to school and enrol for a basic mathematics course, because you clearly don't have any idea about numbers and if you don't think the company accounts are important, you really ought to be putting your money in a savings bank before you lose it all!


Here are a few of your, shall we say, "inaccuracies", or just downright lies?

You said HS had been "charged with fraud", when in fact AERO had ACCUSED him of fraud, an allegation they have now withdrawn!

You said there wouldn't be a placing before the court case, there was.

You said HS's claim "had no merits" when in fact AERO have now capitulated and paid him!

Where is the alleged "fraud claim" now?

You said the court case was a slam dunk, but AERO threw in the towel and paid HS out.

You said AERO have been awarded a 10 year contract by the government, where in fact it "could" go for up to 10 years.

You think that paying HS $75K, and shares that dilutiedthe company by 11% is good, whilst clearly said dilution is not good because if they are ever to make a successful company, your slice of the pie is 11% thinner than it was!

Once again basic maths is your failing...........

but no surprise there!

[loverat] 02/11/2016 16:41

SK

Stop squirming.

The Independent Reviewer is not the Ombudsman. If you post the word Ombudsman in the legal sense people would understand that to mean the Legal Ombudsman. The SRA and Ombudsman are two distinct organisations with separate roles.

If you knew anything about the law and the above organisations you would not have said that the Ombudsman awarded compensation against the SRA.

[loverat] 02/11/2016 16:33

Blimey - they are all out this afternoon.

Still perhaps we should all be honoured to be in the estemmed company of infamous financial wrongdoers who have had articles written by them by the likes of Paul Baptista and Broker Man Daniel.

This classic article featuring Stigologist.

Enjoy!

[loverat] 02/11/2016 16:27

Sweet Karolina

By the way, not much point filtering me if you are going to carry on reading my posts.



Sweet Karolina
2 Nov '16 - 12:08 - 2947 of 2976 1 2
Wow it did not take the Loveprat long to turn up.



Loverat
2 Nov '16 - 11:53 - 2946 of 2947 0 0 (Filtered)

[the stigologist] 02/11/2016 16:20

Love it when Loveprat talks about litigation when he failed so badly in his attempt to arrange one after one of his failed investments cost him 'hundreds' (and wiped him out)

LOL


The Irish Life and Permanent Thread - IPM

Loverat - 01 Aug 2011 - 19:29:44 - 3140 of 3806

I would be interested in knowing who might be keen on a second wave of litigation.
At the appropriate time of course.

Please e-mail me with your user name and shareholdings - if interested.

My brand of litigation is far from conventential but nevertheless something which may be worth exploring. And this litigation may be dirt cheap.

[e-mail]



Loverat - 12 Aug 2011 - 01:37:16 - 3188 of 3807

The government were wrong. The BOD were wrong. Legally and morally. The former knew this and the latter merely carried out the orders they were given.

You lot were taken for mugs but regrettably had no fight in you when there was a chance to salvage something. You can't blame the shareholder above for taking action. I sent the papers over to pursue legal action - but the others backed out at the last moment.

So, I guess the message is - if you want to get things done - do it yourself and don't rely on others to support you.



Loverat - 12 Aug 2011 - 18:20:12 - 3191 of 3807

This is one action I would consider taking upon myself at the appropriate time and after further advice.

I warned about the problems with action groups some time back and I was proved right. Unfortunately I failed to heed my own advice and steer clear.

If you want to get anything done in this life forget about relying on ADVFN posters and other strangers.

[sweet karolina] 02/11/2016 16:16

I know what the financial position was 4 months ago. I know that they desperately need to raise money. I cannot be precise about the current financial position but I can project forward based on trends and information that has been released which might change what the straight line trend would predict and give a likely range of what the position is now - net current liabilities between $1.5M and $2M. Nobody should be investing in shares if they cannot do really basic projections.

Prove you are in someway competent to tell others we are all talking rubbish and that contrary to what we are saying and the company itself said that everything is in fact rosy in the garden, by doing a basic projection allowing for all the announced facts and credible variations which have not been announced for some reason - AIM rules state they have to announce if there is a material change either for the better or worse. Generally most companies are very quick to announce changes for the better and slow to announce changes for the worse.

[sweet karolina] 02/11/2016 16:00

Ahh Loveprat the pseudo lawyer demonstrating his total lack of knowledge:

Solicitors regulation authority
 The role of the independent reviewer
 
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the independent regulatory body created by the LAW SOCIETY to regulate solicitors and law firms of England and Wales. The SRA supervises firms and individuals and can take enforcement action against those caught breaching its principles. 
 
The SRA has appointed the independent reviewer to consider complaints about the standard of service provided by the SRA. The independent reviewer accepts complaints from members of the public and from those regulated by the SRA. Allegations of unreasonable delay, unprofessional behaviour, poor communication and discrimination fall inside the independent reviewer’s remit. 
 
The independent reviewer is unable to review or overturn regulatory decisions made by the SRA. Examples of regulatory decisions the independent reviewer cannot consider include:
* Whether or not the SRA decided to investigate an allegation made about a regulated individual or firm.
* Whether or not the SRA decided to take enforcement action against a regulated individual or firm.
* Whether or not the SRA authorised a payment from its compensation scheme. 
 
The independent reviewer does not investigate complaints about individual solicitors or legal firms. Complaints about solicitors should be made to the Legal Ombudsman. You can contact the Legal Ombudsman on 0300 555 0333 or by email at [e-mail]
 
When can you complain to the independent reviewer?
 
Before the independent reviewer can investigate a complaint, the complainant must first raise their concerns with the SRA and complete its internal complaint procedure.  If you have a complaint about the SRA, you can complain to the SRA by speaking to the person you have been dealing with, or their manager. Alternatively, you can complain to the SRA’s central complaint team using the following contact details:
 
By telephone:  [phone]
By email: [e-mail]
By post: SRA Complaints, The Cube, 199 Wharfside Street, Birmingham, B1 1RN 
 
Please visit the SRA’s website for more information about the way it handles complaints:  hxxp://www.sra.org.uk/sra/complaints-service.page
 
At the end of its internal complaint procedure, the SRA should inform you that if you remain dissatisfied you have the right to complain to the independent reviewer and provide our contact details. 
 
Complainants have 15 working days from the date of the SRA’s final response to ask the independent reviewer to investigate their complaint. The complainant may ask the SRA's corporate complaints team to refer the complaint to the independent reviewer. Alternatively, the complainant may contact the independent reviewer directly. 
 
Contact us  If you have completed the SRA’s internal complaint procedure and would like to ask the independent reviewer to investigate your complaint, please contact us using these contact details:
 
By telephone: [phone]

By email: [e-mail]
By post: Independent Reviewer, PO Box 1272, Warrington, WA4 9RP

Please do not spread lies about me I have never been in court as a defendant and nobody has ever sought to extradite me.

Just because someone tries to bully you through legal means does not make you guilty of any misconduct, especially when they chicken out before going to court and pay all the costs. Dodgy characters use legal bullying because they expect the other party to cave in to avoid the hassle and expense. However like most bullies they are also cowards with something to hide.

Hmm did SA not attempt to sue someone and then chicken out when they fought back?

[kemche] 02/11/2016 15:50

Well Aero have just about had it and it's obviously sinking , Altogether done and completely crazy. I need say no more, The last few pages of posts showing the accounts analysis say it all!

[bygdennis] 02/11/2016 15:47

Well group, You've just about had it and it's obviously sinking in, Altogether done and completely crazy. I need say no more, The last few pages say it all!

[bygdennis] 02/11/2016 15:43

Sweetie pie or sour puss, You have no idea what the financial position is at this time do you? Is it dire? The last accounts were not as good as they could have been but if certain difficulties encountered went as smoothly as they could have.
Business is business and not everything is straightforward or have you never been in business?,
The reason you are failing is you ignore the fact Aero are through the difficult period and moving on fully integrated and with new gains under their belts,
Also there are certain reasons for us to be very optimistic more will follow as we now settled and concentrating on what matters.
These things you ignore others who research are fully aware and will not be influenced by you dire outdated views,
Carry one but you are wasting your time, Just read up on the latest RNS reports, Then come back and tell us what they mean, Not your take on it, Just what they mean.
We'll see then just how intelligent you really are,

[kemche] 02/11/2016 15:39

BygD, Last time you said you were really intelligent. And continue to say. As you said. And continue to do so. As you said. And will, no doubt, do so again.

[bgydennis] 02/11/2016 15:37

You're all liars - I am kemche and pilotov, and the Gangleader, I think, but I forget sometimes.....

[kemche] 02/11/2016 15:36

I am in fact BygD! Except I can string a sentence together. Or possibly two.

[pottermagic2310] 02/11/2016 15:26

Impossible Kemche... you're not me for I am me and furthermore I am not you who is not I, nor we them or them us
LOLs
;-)

[bygdennis] 02/11/2016 15:25

Just a small change kemche=pilotov, Last time you said you were (the one) Not much difference though, i suppose!

[sweet karolina] 02/11/2016 15:24

Dennis there is only one topic that really matters and that is the dire financial position of the company. Those of us who can read accounts and do projections come to basically the same conclusions. As you cannot read accounts and do basic projections you cannot contribute to the only real discussion.

Did the company lie when they said they need to raise money in the next month or so? I suspect not, indeed I suspect their Nomad forced them to at least be clear on that, though anyone who can read accounts and do projections could work that out without the company putting it in black and white.

Instead of answering any of the key issues, you devote all your energy to developing conspiracy theories.

You claim to be up to date and encourage others to do research, but not to examine the accounts and do some basic projections - how bizarre. Did nobody explain that for shares to make you money the company has to make money and if the company runs out of money your shares become totally worthless, regardless of how much potential the company may or may not have had?

[pilotov] 02/11/2016 15:23

No you're not kemche - I am! Except that I'm not you. Except in the eyes of the possessed one, who sees us both everywhere! He must look under the bed before he sleeps!