Seeing Machines Share Discussion Threads

[longsight] 17/7/2020 07:53

https://www.slashgear.com/mercedes-looks-to-new-sensors-so-lavish-2021-s-class-is-more-user-friendly-10628510/

[master rsi] 16/7/2020 23:06

Boucing from 61.8% fibonacci retracement

[tradermel] 16/7/2020 14:54

First bought this just before the Cat deal at 4.4p in 2013. Bought more at 3.1, and 4.5. Listened to all the promises and "deals" along the way and now this clown is in charge with his imminent BS it gets worse. Edit and I am 100% responsible for the buys, the company are responsible for failure in share price

[lewbo18] 16/7/2020 11:31

Trader, we all make our own decisions based on what we know. Some are happy some aren't, that's fair enough for both sides.I had put this together, rules are its very close to the truth as far as my understanding is. The share price doesnt reflect this thats for sure.HTTPS://ibb.co/0FXr2Rg

[baggariddim] 16/7/2020 11:11

It's cutting edge technology don't you know?

[rjcdc] 16/7/2020 08:40

I’m tempted but need to see some more volume first... I might even join the trading club...

[lewbo18] 15/7/2020 14:51

Good idea Base, I've added more today too.

[base7] 15/7/2020 08:29

I have ‘taken advantage’ of buying more shares under 3p

[rjcdc] 15/7/2020 07:45

Entering top up territory... So disappointing that they couldn’t keep the momentum going in order to bridge the gap to the next leg up... They should sack their PR team...

[zero the hero] 14/7/2020 11:11

Fell into the trap nicely, at least you know its not me as you cannot vote your own posts down :-) Zero the Hero 14 Jul '20 - 10:50 - 15745 of 15745 Edit 0   1  1

[shallwe] 14/7/2020 08:25

Not sure why my post was voted down, but hey-ho, there's one born every minute.

[shallwe] 14/7/2020 07:22

Maybe you need to read this article to understand the problem?https://www.eetimes.com/watches-hedge-funds-and-avs-complex-or-complicated/

[tradermel] 13/7/2020 22:49

I may be negative on SEE's PR but ill researched posts like the last just make me want to puke.

[supernumerary] 13/7/2020 21:30

Lew - surely the question is when will L5 vehicles be able to deal with all edge cases demonstrably better than the average driver? If they're operating, and death rates are falling, surely that's enough to justify more widespread adoption? Remember, the best is the enemy of the good enough...

[lewbo18] 13/7/2020 20:59

The new Merc S class looks very impressive. Ken Kroeger on linkedin states that it all started at CES 2016........and here it is today.

[lewbo18] 12/7/2020 09:50

The important question is when will L5 cars be able to deal with all edge case problems and be affordable for the likes of us all to have one. Who will pay for the city and road infrastructure to facilitate this.So until that happens, improving ADAS systems including DMS and DSM will save a lot of lives in between.

[willoicc] 12/7/2020 09:40

The important question is, how many people get killed by autonomous vehicles compared to the number killed by human drivers?

[supersonico] 12/7/2020 09:12

Thanks Lewbo18, Interesting reference to J Rickards and the discussion of complicated and complex systems.

[lewbo18] 12/7/2020 07:40

Good write up about how difficult L5 is and how AV companies are starting to understand....HTTPs://www.eetimes.com/watches-hedge-funds-and-avs-complex-or-complicated/

[cfb2] 10/7/2020 17:54

Tesla has some very talented developers working for it but if you watch some of the technical videos you will discover that whilst the car is able to identify objects in 3D in real time (a very impressive feat) its cognitive abilities have a long way to go. In other words, the AI's ability to judge the correct decision based on changes in the environment. Musk refers to these as the many, many small problems that the AI needs to learn. With this in mind, how quickly do you think countries, states, insurance companies and legal entities are going to give permission for these vehicles to operate autonomously? Proving the cars operate in all environmental conditions better than a human driver (a requirement for level 5) is not going to happen quickly. In the field of AI it is often difficult to prove the inputs that result in the outputs. Putting it another way, what things the AI was looking at to result in it taking a particular action. In the Gulf war the initial AI used for auto targeting tanks in the desert was found to lock onto ally tanks. Investigations showed the AI training had picked up on the shadows the tanks made in the sand resulting in it auto targeting any tank when the sun was in the correct position in the sky. I think Telsa may technically be quite close but every time they kill someone there will be >6 month delay as the causes are investigated. They could easily be 20 years away from having cars driving autonomously.

[zero the hero] 10/7/2020 12:29

egrid1 don't blame you in the slightest always good to take a profit, especially when poorly researched. Understanding bluster and BS (typical Musk) is central to share-trading. Meanwhile how level 3 operates in Tesla is inferior to that of Ford's coPilot360 which is probably (unless the SEE RNS's of the past are BS?) SEE tech sitting behind the infotainment system

[egrid1] 10/7/2020 11:54

Well on the basis of that story, I decided to sell out, whilst still a little ahead.