We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.60 | 9.40 | 9.80 | 9.60 | 9.38 | 9.60 | 148,854 | 08:00:21 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.44 | 89.07M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
17/10/2018 13:54 | Isn't that the point of a BB? (To make a point that is) Have I made my point? Let's just hope nobody wants to invest a substantial sum, then there will be no need to issue any more shares (apart from a few to satisfy the director share options as and when necessary) In which case, why bother going to the proactive event, total waste of time. Suppose I won a big sum on the Euromillions, £90M. I decided I would like to fund SCLP to the tune of £10M (I am now a "high wealth investor". Would I just make a "donation". No, if I wanted to make a "donation" I would donate to CRUK and let them decide who gets funds. I would want AT LEAST 100M shares for my £10M. I'm sure the BOD would be scrambling to sign the paperwork to issue the additional shares. | gazza | |
17/10/2018 13:50 | I, as the returning officer for the constituency of REALITY, having declared Gazza - To have WON by a 'walk over'.AKA = 'A Technical KNOCK OUT' And = In responce to the 'sulky' proposal by the trHYPE 'GROUP' party... I REJECT the trHYPE 'GROUP' party's 'motion'... that, having LOST a debate {Hands DOWN}... *WE ALL* follow a proceedure they want to introduce, a 'system' of = *A best of three* | the real lozan | |
17/10/2018 12:39 | I, the returning officer for the constituency of REALITY, declare Gazza - To have WON by a 'walk over'.AKA = 'A Technical KNOCK OUT' In responce to the 'sulky' = "It's not enough to be Lofty Gaz - you need to make a point." . Gazza....DID {make a point} | the real lozan | |
17/10/2018 12:28 | Gazza - very astute !! So the recommendation for ProActive comes from . . . . ProActive ? Or ? Wow - You're on the ball. Repeat - ''Perhaps you could helpfully give some details of the 'past history' you invoke?''. Oh dear. So you can't you substantiate that ? It's not enough to be Lofty Gaz - you need to make a point. BFN | torquayfan | |
17/10/2018 11:47 | TF, From the Proactive web site: quote -------- About One2One Forums Proactiveinvestors One2One Forums have rapidly gained global recognition as the preferred format for hundreds of listed companies across the world's leading stock exchanges seeking to present to an audience of astute high net worth investors, fund managers, private client brokers and analysts ------ End quote My point was: IF someone wanted to invest a substantial amount of money, where would the shares come from? Think about it. Do you think there is an existing holder(s) who would be willing to give up a load of shares? How would Scancell benefit from this? They wouldn't. They want NEW/ADDITIONAL investment and that can only be achieved by issuing MORE shares which incidentally the BOD have the power to do. It really isn't rocket science!! | gazza | |
17/10/2018 11:40 | Yes Tosh. £25K would be marvellous to say the least ! Really should beat Winchester City FGS but . . . There'll be a good crowd - 2000 maybe LOL You can follow stuff here | torquayfan | |
17/10/2018 11:25 | Gazza - ''The presentation is to high wealth individuals and fund managers.'' Who told you that ? And you think the 'ProActive' event will lead to a new placing with some of these. Let's see shall we ? Perhaps you could helpfully give some details of the 'past history' you invoke ? | torquayfan | |
17/10/2018 11:17 | Terror - you would never understand disagreeing with someone but also trying to remain civil about it . . . . You would also never understand that it's simply balanced to look at the positives regularly as well as looking at the negatives. As for your analysis - way off. Maybe the opposite is truer. Now run along . . . | torquayfan | |
17/10/2018 11:15 | P S - The ONE thing that has become EVIDENT is that = NO ONE 'can' TRUST the REAL intentions of the trHYPE 'GROUP'... OR TRUST / PLACE ANY FAITH... in ANYTHING they say. | the real lozan | |
17/10/2018 08:44 | TurkeyFan just doesn't get it as he tries to Ramp the share price to no avail. Combined with him desperately trying to secure C7's friendship, it paints a picture of a person low in self esteem, confidence and intelligence. But never mind, the ASTUTE all knew that anyway. | terror | |
17/10/2018 07:54 | TF, with respect, it was meant to be patronising, glad you found it to be so. | gazza | |
17/10/2018 01:52 | Gazza with respect I thought your 18003 was patronising. Think this through - share price 9.75 pence despite years of participation in ProActive events. I am cynical of the lofty purposes you ascribe to this Meet - of course it's always possible a new Investor(s) might be found - no doubt some have been found in the past. Maybe not for 'new' shares ? IMHO for Scancell - ProActive just provides an easy platform for some organised publicity - not much more than that. Suggestions we are raking around for new Investors conflict with my wish to hear more from CH about his foreseeable 'monetization' ! GLA | torquayfan | |
16/10/2018 15:13 | THE IRONY ! C7 has been on the VAL BB, accusing posters of ramping .... hahaha classic stuff. The same guy that berates posters on SCLP for posting when they don't hold any shares, has the audacity to do exactly that on the VAL BB, and the biggest ramper of them all, points a finger at other people who ramp their own share, its brilliant stuff. And He then says that the market clearly "agrees with his assessment of VAL " as the price is only 1.60p - 1.75p, which is a classic statement bearing in mind his continual denial that the share price bears any relationship to the value of SCLP. Talk about double standards ! He then doesn't like it when the VAL boys rock up on the SCLP BB and start doing the same to him. | tosh123 | |
16/10/2018 10:53 | Yes, considering all the possibilities is sensible and certainly not "scaremongering". We were told to "expect the unexpected". In the excitement it would appear that some have forgot to expect the expected! | gazza | |
16/10/2018 08:51 | Gazza, precisely. I hope that history doesn't repeat itself, but as we can all see, the pattern is there. Any further issue of shares will have to be at a price based off the current SP, and as such, it doesn't feel very comforting. Maybe we will be told something at the AGM ( or just before ) that will lighten everyone's view, and provide something tangible, we can but hope, however, i will not be holding my breath. TF, scaremongering ? Absolutely not, its reality ! Just look at what has happened over the last 8 years, its there for everyone to see. If this time is different, then i will be a very happy man. | tosh123 | |
16/10/2018 08:48 | Gash, try and think it through: Do you think you are EVER going to get a BALANCED, common sense View from trHYPER Tarquin ??? Clue: have a look at past history. . Good to see the 'upsurge' of more reasoned debate posts from folks like yourself | the real lozan | |
16/10/2018 08:27 | TF, try and think it through:The presentation is to high wealth individuals and fund managers.What are Scancell hoping to achieve?Significant Investment from aforementioned wealthy people and fund managers.Where do you think the shares will come from?The bod are already authorised to dilute by up to 25% of the company.Do you think this power will be reconfirmed at the agm or perhaps even extended?Last question: IF the bod do exercise their powers and IF they do manage to find willing investors, do you think the placing price will be higher or lower than what it is now. Clue: have a look at past history. | gazza | |
15/10/2018 16:50 | TF, I have many buckets, unlike quite a few over on the other place i have spread my investment, so even if there was a hole in one of them, another one would be filling up. To be fair, i would think that 99% of investors have numerous buckets ( its not rocket science ), so theres nothing big or clever about it, just basic common sense. Im not talking anything down, im just considering the " reality " of the situation, in that the share price is back to where it was 8 years ago, is still on the decline, and to add further to the situation, when scancell have had " investor roadshows " before, they are normally followed by a raising of some description. If those of you on the other forum would remove those rose tinted glasses, you would not be in the state you're in right now. The village idiot is still taking you all for a ride. He knows nothing ! The market will decide what happens, not some uneducated half wit who should be back inside making mail sacks. | tosh123 | |
15/10/2018 16:22 | TF, the positive on the pro Active presentation is the other 2 companies have a worse share price performance than Scancell. There again, perhaps they are better bargains? | gazza | |
15/10/2018 16:04 | Tosh - you have a hole in your bucket so you don't really know if it's half full or empty. You are talking SCLP down today with your usual talent. You post in theory, (actually we know bigger all except about the overwhelming weight of Scancell's science), the Pro Active bit could be + or - Maybe wait and see ? | torquayfan | |
15/10/2018 15:47 | Gazza, history tells us the answer is probably yes, hence my post. Lets hope that it doesn't repeat itself though. | tosh123 | |
15/10/2018 15:28 | What does history tell us? | gazza |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions