Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[the real lozan] 29/10/2018 16:13

BoB -
So *WE ALL* CAN gather that the answer to -"WHERE did this 'suggestion' of "7 trials"
'originate' ???"
Is =
"this 'suggestion' of "7 trials"... That NEVER were... 'originated' from Inane cur .
I think *WE ALL* agree, ACTUALLY there ONLY ever were = 3 in total

[bermudashorts] 29/10/2018 15:49

From memory Inan's argument was that Modi1 trial covers more than one type of cancer and so each type of cancer targeted could be counted as a trial - that would give 5 and can't remember where the other 2 came from. Might have got that wrong but the only planned trials are SCIB1 combo, SCIB2 combo and Modi1 - 3 in total

[drdobson1] 29/10/2018 14:39

That idiot is posting more carp.
He says only 1 expert who is 100% certain to predict science outcome and guess who that is and says anyone else has 50% chance of predicting share price direction.
Well the truth is he is no SCience court just a Failed Professor PLUM who steals other scientists work.
Well 50% in predicting share price is twice as good as his 100% prediction on the share price of £8 a share when it is now 8p.
Wish they would not ask his pinion on anything as he always blows his own trumpet and every time some one posts something new like patent news he always has his own view to be obeyed rather than recognise someone else’s efforts.
Agema is right about others being bullied off MFFF while he is biggest bully in the world.
He says he won 7 trial debate but took a month to CONvince all.
I thought the 7 trial debate was the number of trials that had been delayed by SCLP in the last few years.
He us a prime pillock

[panama7] 29/10/2018 14:01

Tosh & ONW, we have also been told going back six years that there is " Significant Interest " in both platforms , yet in all that time this interest has not translated into one single deal. Torquay as for libellous nonsense , I think you'll find I have documentary evidence that proves Goodfellow has blatantly lied to and misled Investors. Maybe you would like to sue me on his behalf.

[tosh123] 29/10/2018 10:48

ONW,
I remember that statement, and couldn't believe it at the time.

The lack of any form of official approach, has always been a bit of a contentious issue as far as im concerned.
If, as we're led to believe, we are riding point in this area of science, then one would of thought that we would have had a few nibbles, at the least.
It was advertised that we had opened up our data room to a few Bio's, a couple of years ago, but having done that, one would expect a lot of interest, yet, here we are sometime later, at a status quo.
Hmmm.... something not quite right ?

[oldnotwise] 29/10/2018 10:41

Interesting that some still believe that listing the catalogue of interests Scancell has somehow makes up for the seeming lack of commercialisation of our (Extraordinary and growing) IP to date.
Obviously we want to see a forward moving and increasing database of interests, but we also want to see some financial reward for those that have been around for the last six years or so (given their apparent world beating class).
I continue to be concerned that we have the armoury, but no one wants to buy in?
I also know that some were saying at one point that RG had done well to avoid doing a deal. I wonder whether that might sound a bit hollow now..... a bit like an empty vessel?
:-)
AIMO
ATB

[torquayfan] 29/10/2018 10:37

P7 - you don't get the words, 'behave yourself' do you ?

This is A1 class libellous stuff M8 and hysterical nonsense - I'm sorry.

Yes timescales have slipped etc. but the words you use are not appropriate and your point is diminished by such inaccurate overstatement.

I'm off. ATB

[tosh123] 29/10/2018 10:31

Very true ONW.

[tosh123] 29/10/2018 10:00

Notice how quiet the idiot is....

He is avoiding coming on here because he knows that he's been beaten up, yet again !

He knows that we called 8p, and last week, called it going even lower.
£1 tomorrow... £ 8 in a few months... No risk...
what a total numptie.

I think that the penny may finally be dropping over on the other place though.
His influence is getting less by the day.

[panama7] 29/10/2018 09:59

Tarquin, I think you'll find it is very accurate, he is a fraud, a conman and a thief who has blatantly lied to Investors for 5 years. He has conned Investors for 5 years to the point where 99% of all Investors are now sitting on losses while he has profited, if that isn't theft I don't know what is. FACT

[torquayfan] 29/10/2018 09:53

Panama7. Behave yourself venomous vituperative vehement Chappie !

Your point is diminished by such inaccurate and libellous overstatement.

I'm off. See u 2m.

[oldnotwise] 29/10/2018 09:51

TF
No worries.
ATB

[torquayfan] 29/10/2018 09:48

Thanks ONW. ATB

[panama7] 29/10/2018 09:47

Tosh, I agree with you Goodfellow is a criminal , he has diverted funds from Investors into his own back pocket, I hope he is there tomorrow to face the flak.

[oldnotwise] 29/10/2018 09:47

Tosh
I think we're all cross that the BOD haven't got it nailed!
:-)
ATB

[tosh123] 29/10/2018 09:45

The much used reference to the song " always look on the bright side of life " is actually quite ironic.
The song comes from the film " The Life of Brian ", and is sung by those who are nailed to their respective crosses whilst being crucified.

eg ;- not realising just how dire their situation is.
Very apt.

[gooosed] 29/10/2018 09:41

As noted elsewhere SCIB2 included in Reference section of paper published in Nature :

[tosh123] 29/10/2018 09:39

Panama,
they cant justify them, hence the resignation earlier this year.

Its verging on the criminal.
Get rid of the chaff.

[panama7] 29/10/2018 09:29

Tosh, yes another example of rewards for failure, be very interesting to hear how they justify their extravagant salaries in relation to the share price performance.

[tosh123] 29/10/2018 09:20

Berm,
i think that my emphasis should have been more toward the salaries , however, i still maintain that we have too many chiefs taking large sums of money from the company, yet achieving zero.
Its almost like an old boys network.

There are fundamental issues with the core of the business, and have been for many years.
No one has got hold of Scancell by the scruff of the neck, and taken it forward.
All they have done is put cash in their pockets and continually lied.
Payment by results is whats required. If that was implemented in an organised and understandable method, then watch them disappear.

We have hit a watershed moment IMHO.