Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 13:15

Perhaps *WE ALL* could settle this mathematically -
YOU post all YOUR 'items/CLAIMS' that actually were PROVEN 'a success / RIGHT'
.
*WE ALL* post YOUR 'items/CLAIMS' that actually were PROVEN 'a FAILURE/ WRONG'
.....
NO CONtest

[gazza] 22/8/2018 13:14

street preachers?

[gazza] 22/8/2018 13:13

Why on earth would I want Scancell to fail? Apart from wanting a good outcome for patients I have a significant amount of money invested here.

Why can you not accept that an optimistic supporter/believer/investor in SCLP can still consider the risks (even though you don't?) What is it about this simple, normal, understandable concept that makes it so hard for you to grasp? There can't even be any benefit to you in not!

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:13

any way i am not driving around and around the M25 with you guys

what for ?

you are all manics

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:11

Lozans famous catch phrase

what happens If ...

what happens if we don't win the Grand challenge

thus a cliff edge is predicted

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 13:08

"lozan predicted a cliff edge moment 6 years ago it never happened '
Care to explain where / when Lozan "predicted a cliff edge moment 6 years ago it never happened"
60p down to sub 10p... now 12p may not be a "cliff edge" in 'trHYPER terms'... BUT
60p down to sub 10p .. is maybe a 'Steep Decline' to most 'reasoned investors'
Although 'reasoned investors' is NOT a term that applies to a PROVEN LOSSMAKING SPIV

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 12:49

gazza like your own prediction it was based on success in trial .. no point predicting based on a trial failure as the consequences would be obvious

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 12:47

I will leave you post wrecking ... PMSL

PS tosh predicted 6p and no movement for 18 months ?

lozan predicted a cliff edge moment 6 years ago it never happened

Dobson can only predict the Taste of a KFC

[gazza] 22/8/2018 12:42

So you are predicting £6 per share 18 months from the start of the first trial.
Is that what you said at the time and if so, was it clear that that is what you meant?
Is your new/old prediction dependent on anything, for example, the trials return good/very good/fantastic data?
Nearly there, keep trying but not quite enough for 10 recs yet!

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 12:33

Gazza the prediction was linked to trials

ATB

they have not started yet

[gazza] 22/8/2018 12:27

Inan, you wrote:

"by the way you cannot disprove a prediction, by the very nature they are not a statement of fact, just an assessment based on current conditions"

A good example of what I/we have been saying. Of course you CAN. When you predict £6 in 18 months and after 18 months it is only £3, sorry, 12p then the prediction has been disproved.

What you should be saying now is:

"Sorry guys, got that totally wrong. The reason I predicted £6 in 18 months is that I thought ..................... and what actually happened was .................. resulting in ............................
I had not considered this a risk but it clearly was. Based on my recent experience I think the share will reach £... in the next ...... months. "

If you post the above and fill in your predictions I will rec your post (rather than what I normally do wreck your post). I guarantee you will get 10 recs at least.

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 12:16

leaving you posting Tosh ...

its your perfect speech ...lets call it, The M25 as it has no end

[drdobson1] 22/8/2018 12:14

Great post Gaza’s and see the Idiott has reappeared like Piaf the Msgic Draghorn
You are right he is AFAilure and Cut and paste Merchant.
His use of English is appalling.ziiam Irish so have a little excise as to why I occasionally spell wrong also I am disclaxic ko.
baNANA take Gaza’s advice
Step back and shut up for about 3 years.zyoy are never right and your Wild farce predictions are pure dreM on stuff.
We do Not value your contribution so but out as Todh says you are undeducated Idiot

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 12:13

Once again Ineptico, you get everything totally wrong.

Just because someone is aware of risk, doesn't mean that they worry about it and die young, you're talking absolute rubbish, yet again.
Appreciation that it exists is sufficient to put ones mind at rest, not the opposite.

Unfortunately, your inability to comprehend it, merely goes to reinforce your lack of understanding ... or ... The fact of the matter is that you do know that there are risks, however, having shouted so loud that there weren't any, and then being caught out by HT on numerous occasions , your ego wont let you accept that you were wrong.

Either way, you are wrong, as has been proven, so it doesn't really matter. You are the one that looks very stupid.

As for " mitigating " risk, theres only one way that you can do that, and that is to trade yourself into a position of zero net exposure, something that you can only dream of.... and as HW pointed out, how can you " pass on " on " try to mitigate " something that you professed, doesn't exist. You're a Fool !

All you do when you continue with this silly charade of trying to pretend that there's no risk, is make yourself look even more of an imbecile than you have done previously, which is no mean feat bearing in mind your history.

[gazza] 22/8/2018 11:55

Inan, I don't support posters I support posts where merited. If you were to post something sensible I would support it.

I refer to my earlier comment:

If he could take advice I would suggest he take a step back from the "I'm always right" attitude, sort out the english problems and tone down the wild predictions (eg no risk/£6 next year). If he did I'm sure we would all then value his contributions. He does undoubtedly research the science very thoroughly.

Have a good day yourself.

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 11:46

gazza,

The only BB that is destructive to scancell itself is this one !!

of which you are one of the Founding members and supporter of

Dobson, Lozan Tosh etc


have a good day

[gazza] 22/8/2018 11:27

WW,

I'm afraid I have to agree with Tosh, but hopefully in a less disrespectful and personal manner.

The most interesting things Inanaco posts are cut and paste clips from scientific papers or the company's own statements. When he proffers his own opinion it is has flaws, logic errors with poor spelling, grammer and punctuation.

So he may post a really good/interesting article that grabs your attention and then he completely destroys any credibility with a comment falling into one (or more) of the above categories. Unfortunately, this has a negative impact on the credibility of SCLP itself and its value as an investment.

If he could take advice I would suggest he take a step back from the "I'm always right" attitude, sort out the english problems and tone down the wild predictions (eg no risk/£6 next year). If he did I'm sure we would all then value his contributions. He does undoubtedly research the science very thoroughly.

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 11:10

WW,
how can you park such a fundamental issues as ignoring risk ?
Im sorry, but if someone cant grasp the most basic of principles, and actually advertises the fact, then i cant take the idiot seriously.
also
When have you ever seen the guy accept that he's wrong ?
Absolutely never, even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary, he will never acknowledge that he got it wrong, and that, coupled with the above, buries any notion that anyone should listen to a word he says.
also
His predictions over the last 7 years have been catastrophic to say the least.
Not once has the idiot called anything right.

With all due respect to you, i think there's way too much parking to be done.
He's a dangerous, uneducated fraud.

[wigwammer] 22/8/2018 10:42

Drdobson - if you park inanaco's suggestion of RISK FREE profits, he has some interesting things to say. If you park lozan's CERTAIN losses point, he has nothing of interest to say. This explains why the objective bods at lse admin have decided to ban one and not the other :)