Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[thelogman] 19/8/2018 14:32

I see nobody got the answer to who am i, maybe ask innanaco? Great share to trade? Lovely.

[gooosed] 18/8/2018 12:12

Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers). It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication. Peer review can be categorized by the type of activity and by the field or profession in which the activity occurs, e.g., medical peer review.

[drdobson1] 18/8/2018 11:51

Snooker CONundrums expertly explained by LOZ
No Risk CONversations expertly demolished by HOT chicken WINGS on MFFF.
How does Failed Professor PLUM respond to RISK if using humanised mice and HUGH RUSK mentioned in Hardman Report.
It is NO RISK as HE posts Anoraky Science that No one understands except him and. Changes argument yo Alzheimer’s.
Well he is an expert in Everything Why Birds Appear RED due to INFRA RED beams and radiation.
What a berk.He reminds me of a cocney Sparra.All chirp and chit.

Total and tier Booffoin.
Runcoeprn Rozzer says only a personal hatred of vaNANA.Well he has gitbthat right.He must have been one helluva detective with those powers of deduction.

[thelogman] 18/8/2018 07:14

Expertly explained loz.

[10acious] 17/8/2018 22:43

Nicely put!ATVB10

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 21:50

Gash, O N W, and others -
*WE ALL* might be 'old gits'... BUT...As *WE ALL* see,,, Our minds / memory/ recall... are still in good working order.
Something the younger smart RRRR ses seem not to 'swallow'

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 21:30

Snooker -
Ypor opponent plays a foul shot.. leaving one red over a pocket, but you can't see/plat it directly = a free ball {substitute red}
You select yellow as 'free ball red' - pot it =scores 1
The cue-ball continues round the table and 'pots' the remaining red in the SAME SHOT
= score 2
You select and pot yellow = scores 2
The yellow is re-spotted
You then pot the yellow as the first in the sequence of colours = scores 2
TOTAL score = 6
,,,,
The CON MEN refers to someone - who ALSO set himself up as a so called 'EXPERT',,,I exposed / PROVED him to be deliberately LYING to fellow shareholders on the lse BEM forum... all those years ago
There are some who read THIS forum who CAN vouch for this
Strangely enough BEM was circa 70p at the time ... 4.65p today
.
Like I said, these SPIVS who try to CON / SCAM folks into BUY,BUY,BUYing = push up a S P by 'creating demand' via FALSE CLAIMS ...are NOT NEW

[oldnotwise] 17/8/2018 21:11

Gazza,
Appreciate your post.
I've got no problem with him, he just thinks he being clever so I'll just ignore it!
It's been a long time with Scancell, and I'm sure we'll get some benefits from our holdings here... at least I hope so!
ATB

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 21:08

Gazza - if you have made profits here, well done. You are "sure" you know another posters profit? Even when the 5 year chart looks like a black run, the poster is here on a daily basis, the poster repeatedly states they own shares? Much easier to deduce a loss than a profit IMO. But to each their own. Best wishes :)

[thelogman] 17/8/2018 20:45

No dr answer is english golfer.

[drdobson1] 17/8/2018 20:36

Loggie
Not a famous cricket commentator by the initials of HB

[thelogman] 17/8/2018 20:29

Who am i? Bond character precedes vessel .. then comes a king.Sporting person is the answer.

[thelogman] 17/8/2018 20:23

Just seen lozan got it.Care to explain how lozan as you have asked the question ten years ago.Con men, care to explain that also.

[gazza] 17/8/2018 20:19

Wiggly, you are drawing conclusions that can't be deduced. I have invested a long time. My first buy was at 11p. I saw it drop to 9p and was worried. It jumped to 17p much to my relief and I sold the lot (at a profit).When it dropped to 13p I thought it was good value so reinvested my original stake and the profit. When it hit 26p I thought wow, doubled my money and sold the lot. It didn't stop there it carried on rising so I bought back in at 33p. I think I must have bought and sold every price up to about 54p. My average is currently 14.7p. Profits in the bank separately. I'm sure old has a similar story, he was one of the first to welcome me to the LSE board.

[thelogman] 17/8/2018 20:18

moljen, totally wrong pal.You pot a ball 3 times without a foul, think again, nobody got the answer?.

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 17:22

ONW - my "personalised fantasy world" - where the long term chart is a dogs dinner, where a long term poster who claims to be a holder has probably lost money, where anyone who has bought at the higher levels probably isn't at the vanguard of risk analysis. Don't break that promise now ;)

[oldnotwise] 17/8/2018 17:03

Wig
I think I'll just ignore you in future.
Enjoy your personalised fantasy world.
ATB

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 16:47

ONW - ah yes, the imaginary profits. Looking at the chart, who could doubt it? And who could also doubt, with the shares now trading at a fraction of the price you got in, that your approach to risk is anything other than exemplary? No wonder the others have gone quiet.. but good to see the bullsh1t quotient here is as high as I suspected ;)