Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 16:47

ONW - ah yes, the imaginary profits. Looking at the chart, who could doubt it? And who could also doubt, with the shares now trading at a fraction of the price you got in, that your approach to risk is anything other than exemplary? No wonder the others have gone quiet.. but good to see the bullsh1t quotient here is as high as I suspected ;)

[drdobson1] 17/8/2018 15:05

Yes even Ardnetsupporters like Wildabeest Farce and Tarquinius and Chelsea 99 made it 99 as if it was Chelsea 999 then the runCOrN rozzer would turn up have said baNANA NO Risk is Not worth mentioning as he will not Budge from it
Just accept it.
Well the ASTute will NOzt accept No RIsk or £8 a Share.
We only accept PLUM is a athicko Arrigant illiterate Prat who is Akways Wrong

[gazza] 17/8/2018 13:13

Loz, your powers of deduction are irrefutable, I am an old git.

[oldnotwise] 17/8/2018 12:37

Wig,
And I foolishly thought you were a genuine poster.
It transpires you're not, simply someone out to adjust the reality of history to their own peculiar slant on things.
OK no worries, believe what you like It's no skin off my nose... LOL
Oh, BTW if you could persuade HMRC that the CGT I paid on the profit my sale of SCLP in 2013 was actually a loss I'll cut you in on the refund!!!
:-)
ATB

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 12:20

ONW - "veneer of cool". I like ;) Thanks for all confirming you owned the shares at much higher levels. With the share chart looking like a dogs dinner, near all time lows, it's a safe bet you all lost money here. Perhaps spivving a share with a current realised value of 12p, a fraction of what you all paid, is some people's idea of astute investing. But it sounds pretty "risky" to me :)

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 11:51

Once AGAIN *WE ALL* see SCAMACO's FALSE use of the 'Royal WE' -

"ie go an find it, don't just assume its there when to date *we* have not seen any."

HE always tries to mislead.. by creating an 'image' that there is an 'US' or a 'WE'
When the TRUTH is = It, the FAKE "we" actually means... " I " { HIM }
*WE ALL* know there is NO "we"

[drdobson1] 17/8/2018 11:33

As Loggy says NO one pays any attention to what baNANA says.
Ricky rover has roasted him again but he comes back for more.
He is Irrelevant a Complete NObody who understands Nothing.
He is bitter and twisted having lost sooomi h money.
We only refer to HaiM as it gives us all. good laugh and t warn others of SCAMaco.

Ha ha ha ha ha

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 11:23

Gash -
It CAN be deduced, that, like me...You are an 'old git'

[gazza] 17/8/2018 11:19

Just for the record, I have owned the stock at every price there has been from 9p to 65p. Not sure what people are trying to deduce from this?

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 11:18

Nice one RR =
RuckRover
Today 11:11

Inan,

>I have never seen any pre clinical data that compares with moditope<<br />
Unless you have seen ALL the data, from EVERY other trial AND are qualified to interpret it, your statement above is at best meaningless and at worst laughable!

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 11:00

Once AGAIN -
The ...CALM, more BALANCED reasoning of the WISER, more ASTUTE... soon sends the 'cloaked trHYPERS' packing.
*WE ALL* suss 'em out

[oldnotwise] 17/8/2018 10:43

Wig
Reading your posts this morning, not only have you lost your veneer of cool, but you seem to be Inan in reverse! I can't believe that we're on the same side... although even I didn't urge caution at 64p... I was with the herd hoping....
So when I did change my mind I can't remember you being there to back me up.
Why were you so silent?
You can't come along now and suggest everyone was wrong when you said and did nothing...
So apologies, but it's a difficult one to swallow.
Great wind up attempt though.
Thanks for the fun
ATB

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 10:41

P S -
I don't think I was the ONLY one to TAKE an 80% PROFIT
Some took a HIGHER PROFIT when the S P reached low 40s
However, in exchanges with other folks who read these forums... I announced my INTENTION to TAKE PROFITS beforehand
.
NO ONE makes a PROFIT or a LOSS... until they SELL
So ANYONE CAN CLAIM "not to be in LOSS"
BUT
ONLY those who have 'trousered' CAN enjoy REAL PROFITS

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 10:26

Seeing as you ask -
"Hello Lozan. Did you also own the stock at 27p+? Yes or no :)"
YES I did
BUT, unlike the sheeple
I SOLD at 38.6p [well documented at the time} when the S P rose post FUNDING at 22p
. "two ounces of sense" ... One might opine ???

[panama7] 17/8/2018 10:20

Wigwammer, next you'll be telling us you were aware of Scancell 6 years ago and knew that the Shareprice would be 10p in 6 years and would wait patiently for 6 years for your entry point. Of course you did.

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 10:19

Hello Panama. Did you also own the stock at 27p+? Very astute.. (no data, no patents, no partnerships, no funding)

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 10:17

Hello Lozan. Did you also own the stock at 27p+? Yes or no :)

[panama7] 17/8/2018 10:15

Wigwammer, you have just stated as fact ONW has lost money , please provide evidence to back up that statement.

[the real lozan] 17/8/2018 10:14

Two ounces of sense =
"ONW - I suspect 64p is somewhere closer to your purchase price!!"
With an opening CLAIM like that - Straight out of 'The thoughts of chairman Mou th....
Some might deduce / SUSPECT, that rather than O N W { having"two ounces of sense" to sell at 27p} that, for this 'Son of SCAMACO' tone suggests =
Wig- I/*WE ALL* suspect 64p is somewhere closer to your purchase price!!
And
This 'Son of SCAMACO'...DIDN'T... have the "two ounces of sense" to sell at 27p
.
It seems the norm for the trHYPERS and the trHYPE swallowers... to be the first to 'point the finger' at others.

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 10:06

"Why would he have sold at 64p when at the time we were being informed by the BOD they were going to sell the Company.." ...because SCLP had no clinical data, limited patents, no meaningful collaborations, no secured funding into the clinic.. sure, you can hold management accountable for missing targets - but to an outsider they have gone a long way over the years to ameliorating those risks.. if an investor chose to ignore the risks at the time - the buck stops with them.. ONW has lost money here. I have not. The market has already indicated who should be dishing out the lessons in risk :)

[gooosed] 17/8/2018 10:05

May be of interest - while we wait for news :

[panama7] 17/8/2018 09:38

Wiggie, ONW stated many years ago he sold at 27p fact. Why would he have sold at 64p when at the time we were being informed by the BOD they were going to sell the Company . ONW sold when the sale that never was was made public. He has been proved to be 100% correct in selling at 27p the share chart tells you that. What you need to ask yourself is why with all those positives you have stated is the shareprice at 11p.
Fact the BOD have failed to deliver anything for Investors although stating they would do so on several occasions. They have even had to amend their options twice and reduce the targets due to their miserable failings.

[wigwammer] 17/8/2018 09:21

ONW - I suspect 64p is somewhere closer to your purchase price!! You have hung around this stock for many years, you claim repeatedly to be a holder, the long term chart is a disaster. I'll let you into a secret.. Nobody with two ounces of sense is going to believe you have done anything but lost money here. It is nice that you have learnt a little about risk, but amusing that you are now dishing out lessons to those who saw it all along. Do risks still exist? Of course. But they are substantially ameliorated by the clinical data, the patent protections, the collaborations, the funded plan into the clinic, the lower valuation - all the stuff you failed to consider when buying the stock many years ago. Hope that helps :)