Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 17:05

hardly .. just you have not stated what i have posted that is incorrect

even a £1 on the cards does not mean a £1 as it refers to a possibility

the issue here is i will always be wrong, just because i am right

cannot debate that i am afraid

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 16:06

Gazza,
sums him up. He's a yellow bellied coward.

[gazza] 22/8/2018 15:53

Tosh, don't hold your breath. I think he's taken enough for one day.

[gazza] 22/8/2018 15:53

Tosh, don't hold your breath. I think he's taken enough for one day.

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 15:24

Ineptico,
please feel free to challenge the last post and prove me wrong.

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 15:10

Ineptico,
just so that you at least try to understand what you're writing ;-

prediction definition: 1. a statement about what you think will happen in the future.

So by definition, predictions can be proven to be right and / or wrong.

If the event happens as predicted then, by definition, it was an accurate prediction.

On the other hand...

ALL of Ineptico's predictions have not happened, in fact in all cases, the opposite has happened, therefore, your predictions have been WRONG.

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 14:53

BoB - An interesting find on M F F F... for those who like to 'fill-in-the-gaps' or 'join-up-the-dots'....QUIETLY

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 14:44

Gash -
Glad i got stuck-in this morning = now 44C in the sun,,,35C in the deep shade
Plan is for final delivery Thursday evening.. stack Friday when meteo predict high 20s
Burning logs = It's all about the 'ambiance'....or 'hygglit' as our Danish friends call it.
SCAMACO -
YOU see it pays to 'check-out other sources of info' rather than dictate YOUR limited opinions, and dismiss the 'Altenative Views' of others

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 14:37

And Ineptico finally follows his " no risk " statement with a " IMHO ".
I wonder whether that has happened due to HW, or maybe he has been told to do it ?
Either way, its the first time that he's done it.

But once again he uses the term " i am mitigating risk "...so once again i will pose the question, how can you try to mitigate something that you dont accept exists ?
its utter nonsense.

Furthermore, you painted yourself into a corner again with your pathetic attempt at distance yourself from you own predictions.

Once again, point proven.

[drdobson1] 22/8/2018 14:27

As Gas says you have got the wood in and have Peace of Mind in case the electricity fails so you have been PROactive and NO Risk of being cold
baNANA says NO risk but he is Hot from the roasting she has taken from HOT Wings

[gazza] 22/8/2018 14:08

lozan, I used to have a few acres and a house with log burner. There is nothing as satisfying as preparing for winter with a stable full of logs knowing that even if the gas and electric failed you would have heat, hot water and cooking facilities. It got down to -19C in pershore one year so glad we were prepared.

Glad we asked "what if the electric fails, what if ......"

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 14:03

off now other things to do, Not Stacking wood for one

so the highlight of lozans's year ... The wood Stacking season

so proud of himself he had to tell you

[gazza] 22/8/2018 14:01

the dance group?

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:59

I didn't say that Lozan

in my posts on the LSE i stated

""I have yet to find the mechanism that would cause it to fail""

so i asked others to show how it can fail .. how did that go for them ?

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 13:54

Gash...17157 spot on -
In FACT =
From what *WE ALL* have seen, HIS 'DICTATE version' of mitigation is:

"I have peer reviewed the science and I have decided that it can't fail, there will be no competition, finance will be forthcoming with little or no dilution in fact diluting trillions won't matter anyway, ms Durrant will get a Nobel prize, the grand challenge money is in the bank already, SCLP will transmogrify from a small biotech research company to a global pharmaceautical giant and the share will be £6 (possibly £8) 18 months after the trial starts - buy buy buy and hold hold hold no risk"

BUT...HE doesn't care or wonder why people take exception!!! To HIS induced 6/7 years of LOSSES

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:51

Scancell only operates in one area, it does not manufacture it only creates
the science, the IP for others to eventually take to market

all other parts of the jigsaw are science dependent

poor science = heavy dilution to raise fresh funds etc

so by mitigating the risk in the science it follows that other perceived risks are lowered

like i said this is an M25 posting session. and now your bringing in diversity into the equation

what has that got to do with scancell risk ?

[gazza] 22/8/2018 13:43

Inan,

>but you will not accept my opinion under any circumstances as if i should not be allowed to hold one ?<<br />
Not true, of course I accept that your opinion of risk is your opinion and you have every right to your opinion.

>what i do is post on how i am "mitigating risk" and its IMHO<<br />
That's fine, but what in your opinion "mitigates risk" doesn't necessarily for others. A lot of the seasoned investors here will mitigate by looking at the management, earnings, financial stability and look to hold a diverse portfolio across a number of sectors. They will also look to take profits and cut losses. They will also consider the risk/reward ratio and their own risk tolerance.

From what I have seen, your version of mitigation is:

"I have peer reviewed the science and I have decided that it can't fail, there will be no competition, finance will be forthcoming with little or no dilution in fact diluting trillions won't matter anyway, ms Durrant will get a Nobel prize, the grand challenge money is in the bank already, SCLP will transmogrify from a small biotech research company to a global pharmaceautical giant and the share will be £6 (possibly £8) 18 months after the trial starts - buy buy buy and hold hold hold no risk"

And you wonder why people take exception!!!

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 13:37

I would personally like to 'thank' SCAMACO for dropping by today and PROVING why *WE ALL* ignore HIS EGO driven, very dubious 'FALSE CLAIMS'

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:37

gazza

I will leave you with What if ....

as that is the future you can worry about ...stress

i have accepted no worries.... no stress

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:34

Dobson it would be a very interesting a peoples Vote

because what that would mean Parliament admitting failure, that its incapable of resolving the issue, in other words it failed to carry through the first vote objective. Even thou it voted to leave by enacting article 50 and enshrining into law leave in March

the problem then would be

can they then resolve the outcome from a second vote if that was also to leave ?

Not difficult to understand is it "take back control"

but it is, if you do not want to leave, i am afraid changing the politicians is the only way out ... not trying to change the vote

[gazza] 22/8/2018 13:25

What if? analysis is a very important part of business especially when it comes to making financial decisions.

Do you think major corporations didn't consider the question "what if the UK votes to leave the EU" or even "what if the UK votes to remain in the EU"

They will have considered the effects of either outcome and planned accordingly.

I don't think they were predicting a cliff and neither was Lozan. Winning or not winning the grand challenge is probably the most INsignificant event in the SCLP calendar. Far worse would be poor trial results. But what if the trials fail? What if anything happens to ms Durrant? What if another company comes up with something better. What if ms Durrant discovers another potential blockbuster? what if someone donates £50m to SCLP for further research. What if an offer comes from left field? What if the £ collapses. What if the $ collapses? What if trump is impeached?

Get the idea?

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 13:23

Gash -
"street preachers?" lol
A little 'too deep' for HIM methinks"

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:22

gazza

Problem is both of us have an opinion .. i accept your opinion of risk in that its your opinion, your the holder of stock, and you have evaluated what is acceptable to you.

but you will not accept my opinion under any circumstances as if i should not be allowed to hold one ?

so i am not critical of your position on Risk

what i do is post on how i am "mitigating risk" and its IMHO

so basically you are trying to dictate rather than debate