Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[wigwammer] 22/8/2018 18:46

"No one else did". Perhaps they just quietly sit at home and ruminate on your hypocrisy. I don't care. The point is, anyone who avoided this share GOT it right. That includes me. But only a right plum thinks that means they will certainly "GET" it right in future. That their prediction carries NO RISK. Sound familiar to anyone.. ;)

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 18:15

Why do FAILED trHYPERS and the swallowers ALONE post ="implying SELL, SELL, SELL is CERTAINLY the only sensible thing to do :)"
NO ONE else does /did
*WE ALL* just got/get things RIGHT
Maybe - They don't like it up em ???

[wigwammer] 22/8/2018 18:13

Gazza - I agree he researches the science thoroughly, and I'm happy to park the rest. There are others here whose faith in the certainty of their predictions is similarly nonsensical, but they offer little beyond that :)

[wigwammer] 22/8/2018 18:09

"In FACT, most reasoned punters see 'BELIEVING' the SCAM trHYPE as a CERTAINTY to MAKE FURTHER LOSSES..." implying SELL, SELL, SELL is CERTAINLY the only sensible thing to do :)

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 17:48

Brilliant !
Wriggle wriggle.
So basically you're now saying that nothing you say should be taken seriously because it doesn't mean anything ?
You really do paint yourself into numerous corners dont you.

How can anyone take such a liar and a cheat seriously.

So just for you, and to ensure that you dont make the same mistake and use such a statement again, i will provide you with the definition of " on the cards "

;- likely, possible, probable, expected, liable to happen, in the wind, in the air, in the offing, on the horizon, in view, in prospect.

So, after some 7 years of failing to get anywhere near £1 i think that the rest of the world would admit, that " on the cards " is not only wildly inaccurate, but it most certainly WRONG.

[drdobson1] 22/8/2018 17:46

Tosh he is an Absolute Coward to debate.
Unless it is on the Cut and Paste Science He is totally frightened of being shown up as his EGO will not allow it.
I know you were not Hot Wings But baNANA Thinks you were and she absolutely roasted him so he is very afraid to take you on.
Notice how he always reverts back to semantics and babbles on about how he can’t be wrong.
Pure verbal diarrohea

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 17:05

hardly .. just you have not stated what i have posted that is incorrect

even a £1 on the cards does not mean a £1 as it refers to a possibility

the issue here is i will always be wrong, just because i am right

cannot debate that i am afraid

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 16:06

Gazza,
sums him up. He's a yellow bellied coward.

[gazza] 22/8/2018 15:53

Tosh, don't hold your breath. I think he's taken enough for one day.

[gazza] 22/8/2018 15:53

Tosh, don't hold your breath. I think he's taken enough for one day.

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 15:24

Ineptico,
please feel free to challenge the last post and prove me wrong.

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 15:10

Ineptico,
just so that you at least try to understand what you're writing ;-

prediction definition: 1. a statement about what you think will happen in the future.

So by definition, predictions can be proven to be right and / or wrong.

If the event happens as predicted then, by definition, it was an accurate prediction.

On the other hand...

ALL of Ineptico's predictions have not happened, in fact in all cases, the opposite has happened, therefore, your predictions have been WRONG.

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 14:53

BoB - An interesting find on M F F F... for those who like to 'fill-in-the-gaps' or 'join-up-the-dots'....QUIETLY

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 14:44

Gash -
Glad i got stuck-in this morning = now 44C in the sun,,,35C in the deep shade
Plan is for final delivery Thursday evening.. stack Friday when meteo predict high 20s
Burning logs = It's all about the 'ambiance'....or 'hygglit' as our Danish friends call it.
SCAMACO -
YOU see it pays to 'check-out other sources of info' rather than dictate YOUR limited opinions, and dismiss the 'Altenative Views' of others

[tosh123] 22/8/2018 14:37

And Ineptico finally follows his " no risk " statement with a " IMHO ".
I wonder whether that has happened due to HW, or maybe he has been told to do it ?
Either way, its the first time that he's done it.

But once again he uses the term " i am mitigating risk "...so once again i will pose the question, how can you try to mitigate something that you dont accept exists ?
its utter nonsense.

Furthermore, you painted yourself into a corner again with your pathetic attempt at distance yourself from you own predictions.

Once again, point proven.

[drdobson1] 22/8/2018 14:27

As Gas says you have got the wood in and have Peace of Mind in case the electricity fails so you have been PROactive and NO Risk of being cold
baNANA says NO risk but he is Hot from the roasting she has taken from HOT Wings

[gazza] 22/8/2018 14:08

lozan, I used to have a few acres and a house with log burner. There is nothing as satisfying as preparing for winter with a stable full of logs knowing that even if the gas and electric failed you would have heat, hot water and cooking facilities. It got down to -19C in pershore one year so glad we were prepared.

Glad we asked "what if the electric fails, what if ......"

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 14:03

off now other things to do, Not Stacking wood for one

so the highlight of lozans's year ... The wood Stacking season

so proud of himself he had to tell you

[gazza] 22/8/2018 14:01

the dance group?

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:59

I didn't say that Lozan

in my posts on the LSE i stated

""I have yet to find the mechanism that would cause it to fail""

so i asked others to show how it can fail .. how did that go for them ?

[the real lozan] 22/8/2018 13:54

Gash...17157 spot on -
In FACT =
From what *WE ALL* have seen, HIS 'DICTATE version' of mitigation is:

"I have peer reviewed the science and I have decided that it can't fail, there will be no competition, finance will be forthcoming with little or no dilution in fact diluting trillions won't matter anyway, ms Durrant will get a Nobel prize, the grand challenge money is in the bank already, SCLP will transmogrify from a small biotech research company to a global pharmaceautical giant and the share will be £6 (possibly £8) 18 months after the trial starts - buy buy buy and hold hold hold no risk"

BUT...HE doesn't care or wonder why people take exception!!! To HIS induced 6/7 years of LOSSES

[inanaco] 22/8/2018 13:51

Scancell only operates in one area, it does not manufacture it only creates
the science, the IP for others to eventually take to market

all other parts of the jigsaw are science dependent

poor science = heavy dilution to raise fresh funds etc

so by mitigating the risk in the science it follows that other perceived risks are lowered

like i said this is an M25 posting session. and now your bringing in diversity into the equation

what has that got to do with scancell risk ?