![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 11.125 | 10.75 | 11.50 | 11.125 | 11.125 | 11.13 | 74,323 | 08:00:28 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -8.62 | 103.17M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
20/8/2018 15:34 | The very unreal Lozan This stuff which is touching has no relevance . . . . ''First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.'' But I don't think I have ever read such shoot - even from you. Nonsense in this context M8 KEEP TRYING - the caps are just for you . . . . | ![]() torquayfan | |
20/8/2018 14:36 | Old, exactly my thought ! | ![]() gazza | |
20/8/2018 13:30 | Fragma And he was/is the ONLY one? ATB | ![]() oldnotwise | |
20/8/2018 13:14 | 17067 - "thats all there is to it !" Of course "thats all there is to it !" However, *WE ALL* know EXACTLY "WHAT IS *ALL* there is to it " | ![]() the real lozan | |
20/8/2018 11:24 | Bermuda Certainly share your frustration, but I've simply decided what will be will be... It seems to be a rather slow (but hopefully deliberate) path that's being trodden in trial starts and news reporting from the BOD. So good luck to those who regularly read the runes and attempt to prophesy the future.... sadly i think we'll have to wait and see.... Anyway, good to see you over here... ATB | ![]() oldnotwise | |
20/8/2018 11:08 | I don't agree with your last sentence but share your current frustration. As I say, it would now be good to get some news on SCIB1 and also would like clarification on strategy for Moditope. I suppose the latter may have to wait for AGM. | ![]() bermudashorts | |
20/8/2018 10:25 | Bermuda, yes of course it could be anything but the fact the trial has been delayed time and again the BOD should show some respect. Their record of communicating truthfully with Investors is appalling. | ![]() panama7 | |
20/8/2018 09:58 | Panama - 3rd party could be anything. Could have been the lawyers drafting and completing the Ichor licensing agreement. It would be good now to get that RNS and also confirmation of CRO and to finally see the trial listed on the Clinical Trials Register. | ![]() bermudashorts | |
20/8/2018 09:26 | Interesting to read this again perhaps, knowing what we now know : | ![]() gooosed | |
20/8/2018 09:24 | Bermuda, you asked a question on the other board with regards to IND delay. Holloway has stated on a couple of occasions that the delay is due to third party intervention we can safely assume he does not mean Ichor. Why he has not told Investors who this third party is only goes to show the BOD's total lack of respect for Investors. The trial is now running 2 years late from it's first original date. We were told the only delay was Ichor now we are told it's a Johnny come lately third party. Bearing in mind it is Investors that are paying for the trial, paying the ever increasing salaries of the BOD it just shows the contempt they hold for their Investors. | ![]() panama7 | |
19/8/2018 14:32 | I see nobody got the answer to who am i, maybe ask innanaco? Great share to trade? Lovely. | thelogman | |
18/8/2018 12:12 | Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers). It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication. Peer review can be categorized by the type of activity and by the field or profession in which the activity occurs, e.g., medical peer review. | ![]() gooosed | |
18/8/2018 11:51 | Snooker CONundrums expertly explained by LOZ No Risk CONversations expertly demolished by HOT chicken WINGS on MFFF. How does Failed Professor PLUM respond to RISK if using humanised mice and HUGH RUSK mentioned in Hardman Report. It is NO RISK as HE posts Anoraky Science that No one understands except him and. Changes argument yo Alzheimer’s. Well he is an expert in Everything Why Birds Appear RED due to INFRA RED beams and radiation. What a berk.He reminds me of a cocney Sparra.All chirp and chit. Total and tier Booffoin. Runcoeprn Rozzer says only a personal hatred of vaNANA.Well he has gitbthat right.He must have been one helluva detective with those powers of deduction. | drdobson1 | |
18/8/2018 07:14 | Expertly explained loz. | thelogman |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions