Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[gazza] 16/8/2018 16:13

Tf, simple answer to a simple question. Not sure why you would assume I'm not cheerful?

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 15:36

Gash -
Me neither
.
Question to ALL =
Is - Making a stupid statement, as SCAMACO did, such as =
When people at CRUK read =
"by passing all the risk of the immunobody program onto CRUK to prove it, at no cost to scancell shareholders"
MORE... or ...LESS - Likely to lead to SCLP winning the CRUK award, that SCLP sooo desperately NEED ???
.
It has been said many,many times that SCAMACO is the BIGGEST 'detriment' to SCLP and SCLP shareholders.
Some might now add = HE, and HIS runaway EGO, is not only 'derti-mental'............ HE IS a bloody LIABILITY

[torquayfan] 16/8/2018 15:27

Inan. I also notice that during an interesting day with certain folks over there - Ms. H'wings has been inactive here ?

Obviously someone we know well may be otherwise occupied.
WMMHAOKIPW. £100 to all the potty if you get it - time limit 1 minute.

This is fun.

Gazza - cheer up !

[tosh123] 16/8/2018 15:22

Looks like HW has floored the cretin yet again !
Its lovely to watch.
She has made total mince meat out of him and made him look even more pathetic than before.
I would like to shake her hand one day, she hammers him every time.
Lets hope this most recent of thrashings will keep the idiot away from the BB's for a while, or better still, permanently.
I bet he doesn't show himself over here for a while .

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 13:57

Is there ANYTHING more likely to 'encourage' a tick-down here, at this moment in time, other than the 'rantings' of SCAMACO ???
Would a 'tick-down' surprise ANYONE ???

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 13:43

SCAMACO gets HIS 'botty slapped' AGAIN by hotwings
HE is 'out of HIS depth' with her....AND...IT SHOWS

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 13:37

Dr D -
"It is PLUM being Thick ha ha ha"
NO
But HE 'thinks EVERYONE ELSE IS'
When the REALITY is = EVERYONE ELSE IS ....NOT

[drdobson1] 16/8/2018 13:33

SCAMACO cries out Hiw Simple Do I need to make these posts.
Well was it simple sImoN who Asked the piemaN And COnned his way to him buying some Sclp shares OR is the Village idiot struggling with things.
Let me think about it.
It is PLUM being Thick ha ha ha

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 13:18

Latest 'twisting' on M F F F from SCAMACO =
" so the market has again turned positive for Scancell "
REALITY = S P at 11.50p mid
.
"by passing all the risk of the immunobody program onto CRUK to prove it, at no cost to scancell shareholders" ???
Very Next SCAMACO post, when exposed by hotwings =
" Hotw1ngs we have not passed on immunobody to CRUK to prove, Scancell is doing it with SCIB1, please keep up "
.
As is said on here many times =You couldn't "Make this stuff up"
Obviously = SCAMACO...CAN...and...DOES
Then, when exposed as a FRAUD... CLAIMS... HE DIDN'T
NO wonder SCAMACO is IGNORED by Sooo many

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 11:04

Riskgate rumbles on -
Where next ???
Will *WE ALL* see spray-painted "NO RISK here" messages appeaing on motorways / buildings in Devon ???
Tarquin IMup has already placed an order for T shirts bearing the "NO RISK here" message... apparently for retail/ discount at £8+ a time to 'GROUP' members and trHYPE swallowers.
A collectors 'limited' item then.

[oldnotwise] 16/8/2018 10:20

Wig,
"repetition and detail" ?
I'd say both sides of the argument display that... hehe
As to "return"(historic) do you really want an analysis of that ATM? :-)
ATB

[oldnotwise] 16/8/2018 10:18

Wig
I'm not sure which BB you refer to, I'm not sure this one's saying, “don’t own this thing cos the clever chaps don’t like it”.
It seems to me that the "message" or even "dogma" as you put it is to counsel caution agianst the other extreme view that says ... well you know, the sort of argument over there that went on last night.
There are holders of SCLP shares here that simply make the point that sensible holdings of SCLP proportionate to the individuals risk profile are worth a considered "investment"
This is in direct contrast to the over the top declarations of risk free investment from elsewhere. In fact it's interesting to see a thread discussing very much the same possibility that trial succes is certainly not guaranteed (but not suggesting there's no possiblity of sucess for SCLP) on the other BB.
I think it's fair to say that most hope for SCLP's success.... It's just not clever to suggest there's no possibility of failure, and all the time that that view is being pushed out it remain a probability that similar comments to those pertaining will emanate from this BB.
Finally, in the past it's been ususal to see people suggesting that the message which counsels risk assessemt of investments means "don't hold", or "sell" or other nregative instructions. Actually your own comment, “don’t own this thing cos the clever chaps don’t like it” is a misrepresentation of the comments made here, so please (as a reasonable and fair poster) slip into the (I'm sure) unintentional suggestion that Risk assessment means "don't hold" or "sell"! I can assure you it doesn't!!!
:-)
Anyway, hope that clarifies and we can clear up a misunderstanding.
AIMO
ATB

[wigwammer] 16/8/2018 10:04

I wonder what is more rare? A biotech board where investors enthuse about their holding, or a biotech board where return is barely mentioned, and risks are elucidated with repetition and detail. It may tell an investor something about sentiment :)

[wigwammer] 16/8/2018 10:00

I'm sure the biotech world has heard the line "it hasn't been bought so it won't be bought" a few times before. It can be applied to most early stage biotech stocks. It doesn't prevent many of them ultimately rising considerably in value. The thing that sets Scancell apart in this regard is that it has an entire board dedicated to repeating the message (dare I say, dogma) on a daily basis - "don't own this thing cos the clever chaps don't like it". Far from pressuring people to buy, the pressure is to NOT buy, or sell. Who knows - heaven forbid this thing ever rises - the act of selling right now might not be a great thing to do :)

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 09:42

Agema 16978 -
DITTO
{Obviously... Takes me lomger to one finger type... 0/-}

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 09:36

O N W -
"the "Other" BB will have you believe that the Market/World hasn't heard of SCLP.... (Under the radar hence the share price level).."
.
botski
Price: 11.80
BioNtech
Today 07:47
" Have just done a $425M deal with Pfizer for a mrna flu vaccine."
.
This would, yet again, appear to show that, FAR from the myth that BIG PHARMA / the Market/World hasn't heard of SCLP..
That, indeed, the BIG PHARMA / Market/World .. ARE well aware of 'What is going on around them'.
It is therefore quite unrealistic for ANYONE to suggest, those that 'hold the purse-strings' in the BIG PHARMA / Market/World { hasn't heard of SCLP}...DON'T KNOW what they are doing.
They MOST CERTAINLY DO.

[oldnotwise] 16/8/2018 09:29

Agema
Can't disagree with your comments, but it was just Wig's comment that made be wonder whether there was a chance that the Pharma/Investing world doesn't know.
In many ways I hope it doesn't but I'm really not sure... :-)
ATB

[agema] 16/8/2018 09:19

Old

Big Pharma has departments looking into buying opportunities. They know all the companies and all the latest results of trials. They will certainly know characters like Lindy Durrant and Richard Goodfellow.

The simple fact is, the big boys don’t think the science is good enough yet, to buy Scancell. That is why more trials were planned by Scancell. They didn’t have a buyer.Even on good results, the big boys have the whip hand. They know these little baby bios are all loss making and strapped for cash. They need to be bought out, or they fade away.

Have a good day all.

[oldnotwise] 16/8/2018 09:10

Wigwammer...
Ah yes, but leading voices (not all) on the "Other" BB will have you believe that the Market/World hasn't heard of SCLP.... (Under the radar hence the share price level)...
So that leads to the interesting question, Does the Market/World know about Scancell or not?
If it does it seems to think that ATM the Risks outweigh the Science. If not then we're all OK waiting for the world to catch up with Scancell, but then they haven't yet assessed the risks.
I think we all know which we'd prefer to be the case, so I hope that your comment,
"it is difficult to believe the world is not now aware of them (The Risks)" might not be completely correct. :-)
A conundrum for our times (about 7 years so far)!
AIMO
ATB

[drdobson1] 16/8/2018 09:05

Yes Tosh UNbelievable.
IF he was a Nice Fella or EVEN showed the slightest sign of CINtrition I may feel sorry for him But as he is an arrogant EGOtistical BULLY who reminds me of NERO then I can’t find any sympathy.
Even last night he made a reference to Good Job Bridge Builders test their designs first to try and PROVE his argument on the same day as the Tragic Motorway Bridge Collpase in Italy
Reminds me of his CRASS Grenfell Comment.
He really is the lowest of the low

[the real lozan] 16/8/2018 08:56

Riskgate -
A quick glance of M F F F shows the extent of exvhanges { all afternoon and evening - right up 'til midnight} of 'effort' to ENFORCE the silly "NO RISK here" demand.
Who CARES ???
Those who CAN see, and believe = There IS RISK here...will not be 'brow-beaten' into changing their minds, by someone argueing 'til the cows come home', that everyone MUST accept the 'One VIEW ONLY' image, that INSISTS ...they admit there is "NO RISK here"
.
NO amount of trHYPE/ EGO will FORCE investors / potential investors / markets.. to 'go against their common sense'.
Investors / potential investors / markets.. WILL / MAY 'BUY' in the knowledge that there IS a RISK
However - investors / potential investors / markets.. WILL NOT 'BUY,BUY,BUY' simply because of a silly "NO RISK here" demand. [ Intended to urge them to do so}
.
IF HE and HIS 'GROUP' want to follow 'the silly "NO RISK here" demand.' = LET EM.
.
BUT, as *WE ALL* know... This issue is NOT about 'RISK'
It IS all about HIM NOT accepting the FACT... That HE is shown to be WRONG...AGAIN

[wigwammer] 16/8/2018 08:54

The unexpected effect of suggesting that something carries "no risk" is that dozens of posters queue up to suggest otherwise, in great detail and nuance. SCLP must be the only biotech with a board dedicated almost exclusively to elucidating and detailing the risks. Given this point, it is difficult to believe the world is not now aware of them :)