Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[football] 03/2/2017 13:10

stocky if and it's a big if they grt the fill rate up a few % barkboo £2.40 will not be pie in the sky anymore

[stocky] 03/2/2017 13:03

Woooow! Quantcast above 50m. If Rhythmone can manage to improve the fill rate, this could go meteoric. Someone in the know - with the supply, the demand and the exchange, why isn't the fill rate much higher?

[1gw] 03/2/2017 13:02

Post 3129 - no STT, that's what you're doing, not what you're saying. You're repeatedly [edit] pushing me to comment on football and shroder.

[1gw] 03/2/2017 13:00

Or on points 3 and 4, perhaps just an apology from you would be sufficient if you don't want to try to defend the indefensible?

[stocky] 03/2/2017 12:58

Agreed STT. We have to wait until April for the results. Not much point IMO in speculating.

[geheimnis2] 03/2/2017 12:57

As well as criticising the behaviour of the funny folk who troll this thread like loops and hotpants we should also recognise the great work done by the likes of barky, stocky, Jarvis, G2 and others

Thanks!

[1gw] 03/2/2017 12:55

You're completely ignoring the questions stt - doing a barkboo I might say. I've turned up to the last 2 AGMs and anyone who was there will tell you that on each occasion I asked in the formal AGM forum a challenging and maybe even confrontational question to the board, trying to hold them to account for past performance and justify to shareholders why the future would be different.

I have posted on your own thread my personal analysis to show why I think we can expect them to report about $170m revenue (excluding Perk) and a hefty bottom line loss for the year. I remain very doubtful about their rns drafting process because of the repeated ambiguous and/or apparently irrelevant statements they make in them.

My challenges to you have nothing to do with my own stance on R1 as an investment (which is cautiously optimistic). They have everything to do with the content of your posts, which as I said in my previous post, I believe shows "bad behaviour". Not because you are sceptical about R1 as an investment opportunity but because of the way you present that scepticism.

Now I've tried to make it really easy for you by numbering the challenges, all of which are about the content of your posts. Can you not provide a proper response on any of the points?

[sikhthetech] 03/2/2017 12:40

I've been here years and have repeatedly seen opportunities missed and the company saying one thing and then a few weeks later saying something completely opposite....
I've also seen how opportunities/headwinds 'quickly' catch up with Ad Tech companies and how this can quickly have a ripple effect through the industry - it's a fast moving industry...

So, if the company back up their comments with finances then the share price will take care of itself...
Given the history of failed acquisitions, vague TUs and poor roi I'll remain cautious until I see the proof or some consistency between TU and results..

Tosca's and other IIs stake here interests me...

Risk/Reward... currently, imo, there's more risks than reward, making it a punt and no more, it's my money ...others may disagree, it's their money..

Everyone is entitled to believe what they want.. if anyone thinks everything is great and there's a guaranteed return then it's your choice... invest what you like... why don't the rampers load up, sit back and wait for the return...

[football] 03/2/2017 12:40

and again quantcast still going up daily

[1gw] 03/2/2017 12:35

That's quite a long list of the regular posters on these boards I've given you isn't it STT, and that's just off the top of my head.

Why not just try to argue your case instead of avoiding the challenges? Aren't these all legitimate challenges about the content of your posts?

1. Take away all opinion and I am asking you to justify 2 statements you made recently, one saying that the "transparency" metric on pixalate in-app rating was more important than the "global" seller trust ratings, the other that "campaigns are up". Can you do that?

2. The comment on interpretation of your "campaigns" comment was an opinion. I certainly interpreted it as negatively qualifying the improving Quantcast statistics. Did you not mean it as such? I invite you to find a singular regular reader of this thread who doesn't interpret it as such.

3. For someone who tells others to play the post not the poster, what are you doing making comments about "blatant liars" and "multi ids"? Do you have any evidence that multi ids are voting up my posts? I seem to remember you used to claim that votes from multi ids weren't counted by advfn when ranking most popular posts? Were you incorrect on that?

4. Your repeated references to football and shroder are reminiscent of barkboo at his worst. Pushing people to comment on other posters as a way of deflecting from the content of posts.

[stocky] 03/2/2017 12:32

Lol. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

[sikhthetech] 03/2/2017 12:32

The FCA exist...

Contact them ...

[sikhthetech] 03/2/2017 12:28

1gw, lol...
yes, the ones already exposed by others..

football... your posts have highlighted me in post but mention him in as secondary and as some of justification for his behaviour and anger..
you keep quiet whilst he and others post dozens of goading posts but then speak up after I eventually reply... wait until to see if I reply...really, that's your justification for speaking up against them...

Prime example...after dozens of goading posts, I eventually replied...

Like I said you think what you like... the years of posts on the various threads shows you are wrong...
I'm not changing my principles in defending myself against bullies..


1gw - 12 Jan 2017 - 11:56:04 - 4049 of 4686 RhythmOne - 2016 a new beginning - RTHM
I find it positively weird stt how you refuse to let go of your conviction that there is some big conspiracy around R1, apparently involving both co-ordinated action by posters on these boards and some sort of deliberate "dodgy" behaviour by the company. That post from December 2014 reminds me how long even I have been of this opinion.

While I don't agree with posters attacking you personally or chasing you onto other threads I fully understand how investors in R1 would become frustrated and indeed angry at your behaviour and posting style on these threads.

Rational debate is great in my opinion and I am very willing to hear rationally argued counter-views to my own. But, again in my opinion, this is not what you are doing on the whole. You continue to make unsubstantiated allegations/insinuations about other posters' behaviour, entreating others to contact the authorities, and also continue to repeat time and again the same sort of rather tangential/obscure points about R1 and its history, apparently wishing to sow doubts about the company in other posters' minds.

[stocky] 03/2/2017 12:28

Great post, Polythene.

[1gw] 03/2/2017 12:11

STT - for the record I seem to remember, in addition to barkboo, digi and now you, "speaking against":
x Stocky for persistent misrepresentation of Morningstar institutional ownership data;
x Nick B for apparently supporting pump and dump;
x Kendo/Quil for (probably among other things) apparently being the same poster;
x Geh2 for I can't remember what exactly (probably numerous things) but he was certainly part of the pump and dump conversation one evening;
x LCWA for something or other because I remember coming across his apparent pumping of Xcite and his boasting of easy money on blinkx "If you want to make some dosh, invest in Blinkx. 170 by the end of May." (Oh dear);
x Shroder for kicking you off his board so peremptorily;
x Football - I'm pretty sure I've had a go at him for his treatment of you among other things;
x Various other posters the details of whom I can't quite recall

It's been a busy 3 years on blinkx and I'm afraid my treatment of you is not out of character. If I see someone "behaving badly" I like to challenge them on it from time to time. You've been ticking a lot of my "behaving badly" boxes recently.

Not sure I'll get so many ticks up for this one...

[sikhthetech] 03/2/2017 12:10

oh yes, let's post 1 trading article to 'show' that they do post both bull/bear newsflow...might fool a few... lol...

[sikhthetech] 03/2/2017 12:09

Polythene..

good post.. no one knows if the company would come good... they need to back up their comments with solid figures...
The industry newsflow - it's a fast moving industry..


nothing strange about highlighting areas to counter the gang/rampers... the gang have always tried to isolate anyone who have asked question about the industry and company...
they've bullied off many in the past.. unfortunately, many gave up and moved on, so the gang have succeeded... they won't with me, I'll stand my ground and continue to post industry and company news and my opinions...

why doesn't anyone post all these so called 'positive' news that they claim I have deliberately missed... odd that...

Nothing new..




Polythene3 Feb '17 - 11:47 - 4683 of 4683 1 0
This BB is populated by a bunch of weirdos. Barky even if this share explodes to a £2.40 price you have been wrong. The company was previously making money from unverified desktop ads and were accused of dodgy malware practices in terms of their revenue sources. The company has reinvented itself so there is absolutely no continuity between the two. No one can honestly say I always knew they would come good, cos the company is now like a new start up with a good wad of cash. I am becoming more confident by the day that this startup will work and I hope to make money. But the only way you could say you always knew would be if you were investing in the management only, and not the technology. STT is a bit strange, but it is Loopy that takes the biscuit. I just can't figure out his motivation.

[geheimnis2] 03/2/2017 11:59

agreed Polythene

I get the folks who pop by to have a bit of a dig like alex, hotpants etc and STT has a clear agenda - quite how loops can be bothered trolling this thread for seven years just because she lost her pants on this one years ago is beyond me

[polythene] 03/2/2017 11:47

This BB is populated by a bunch of weirdos. Barky even if this share explodes to a £2.40 price you have been wrong. The company was previously making money from unverified desktop ads and were accused of dodgy malware practices in terms of their revenue sources. The company has reinvented itself so there is absolutely no continuity between the two. No one can honestly say I always knew they would come good, cos the company is now like a new start up with a good wad of cash. I am becoming more confident by the day that this startup will work and I hope to make money. But the only way you could say you always knew would be if you were investing in the management only, and not the technology. STT is a bit strange, but it is Loopy that takes the biscuit. I just can't figure out his motivation.

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 03/2/2017 11:43

You certainly don't want to answer 1gw's questions. You didn't answer mine about why you keep an offline copy of advfn either.