Quadrise Share Discussion Threads

[dudishes] 27/2/2024 18:26

Kefi, yep down £1200 or so at the moment.

\if you wish to make an issue, how much has this outfit cost you, never mind the Cornish mines, 50% down and counting!

Get real, stick with the grand children, give them the money rather than waste on a flippin dream!

[hazl] 27/2/2024 11:41

Desperate posts on the sister thread!

The market likes us at the moment.

imo

[kreature] 27/2/2024 10:31

I wonder if the 10 hours of work time has been used up this month ? Well I’m grateful tbf, must be a tough job

[kreature] 27/2/2024 10:03

Oh yeah, ‘currentlyR17; much cheaper, and as unavailable as ever

[hazl] 27/2/2024 09:53

Jason Miles, Quadrise’s CEO said in a statement to the market: “Quadrise is pleased with the progress made with BTG Bioliquids to date, and we are delighted to be now working alongside Euthenia under this new tripartite agreement. Advanced biofuels derived from woody biomass are expected to be very price competitive net-zero feedstocks. Importantly, the extracted sugars are water-soluble and therefore particularly suited for use with our oil-in-water emulsion technology for shipping and industrial applications.”

[hazl] 27/2/2024 09:37

And it's your money you are losing on KEFI !

[sallad3] 27/2/2024 09:24

kreature

"efficient and cheaper" = "Zero cost" because there isn't any.

Wind power anyone -or perhaps we could revert to the old Galley Ship model with the BoD as the first on the oar benches?

[dudishes] 27/2/2024 02:36

Spin a yarn for another 9yrs, then get serious?

Easy does it.

[kreature] 26/2/2024 22:47

“ We note that Quadrise’s fuels are more efficient and cheaper than fuels currently used, ”

How you supposed to know that without having the fuel and the contracts and the costs and the margins and the permits and the trail results ?

[hazl] 26/2/2024 21:35

Fraine added: “We note that Quadrise’s fuels are more efficient and cheaper than fuels currently used, whilst being safer, simpler to use and generating fewer harmful emissions. CEOs of major shipping companies recently called for an end date to fossil-fuel only powered newbuild vessels and urged the IMO to create the regulatory conditions to accelerate the transition to green fuels at COP 28. We believe progress in making such regulatory changes could be highly supportive for Quadrise.”

[hazl] 26/2/2024 21:33

Tom Fraine, an analyst from Shore Capital that has Quadrise under coverage said: “We are encouraged to see another multinational company acknowledge Quadrise’s solutions for decarbonisation and commit to an agreement. This morning’s update follows the agreement announced earlier this month with Cargill, a major supplier of renewable biofuels, for the production of Quadrise’s fuels for marine vessel trials on the MSC Leandra. We believe Cargill is a very attractive partner for Quadrise, which could lead to future opportunities, given Cargill’s own fleet of [more than] 500 vessels and considerable scale in global markets.”

The AIM-listed company opened the week (19th February) at 2.219p and is 75.9% ahead of where it was trading a year ago. The company has a market cap of GBP34.4.

[kreature] 26/2/2024 13:53

C, Intangible

[kreature] 26/2/2024 13:53

Lol
Tbf, that trademark should add an extra zero to the invisible assets

[sallad3] 26/2/2024 08:50

With all this talk of BioMSAR ZERO being a registered trademark I wonder if they thought to register ZERO as the first word and not the last?

[hazl] 25/2/2024 21:33

Ship Technology Global & Ship Technology
@ShipTechMag
The revised strategy includes an ambition to reach net-zero GHG emissions from international shipping by 2050, a commitment to ensure the uptake of alternative zero and near-zero GHG fuels by 2030, and two indicative checkpoints.

[kreature] 25/2/2024 12:55

Prob on the cusp

[pyglet] 23/2/2024 18:27

and today.....

[kreature] 23/2/2024 14:43

If you just pretend this is a scam with lip service then you can’t be disappointed. That’s why I try not to dwell on the reality too much of it not being a scam

[brookemia] 23/2/2024 12:37

46Gillingham
Posts: 1,105
Price: 2.09
No Opinion
RE: MSCToday 09:09
AKHM agree their seems to be loads of additional deals that need to be thought through that are burning up both time and money. I guess the inital expectations/times were not planned properly and as always poor contingency planning. Just hoping for the best and ignoring risks and unknown....

This is why we will have another funding, with me stupidly thinking both the last 2 rounds would get us to commercialization.
ReplyRecommend (2)Report Post
monkeymo
Posts: 185
Price: 2.095
No Opinion
RE: MSCToday 08:27
QED is in a very bad position financially (or so we think) and we the share holders are still kept in silence left to guess what is going on as it gets darker day by day. We are no at the back against the wall point that has been steadily approaching for several years now as all those webs of hope were thrown over us by the board.