Purplebricks Share Discussion Threads

[kirk 6] 31/5/2023 15:17

I reckon that was a game play to get the stock down and a bid will come through another player this is a game

[kirk 6] 31/5/2023 15:10

Worth buying now you get 0.65 when it's sold up

[williamcooper104] 31/5/2023 15:00

Strike will buy it and pinch all the cash in due diligence/working capital adjustments From BoD point of view better that than the grief of being a director of a company in admin

[kreature] 31/5/2023 14:58

Wonder when it will be Axel’s turn ?

[kreature] 31/5/2023 14:53

‘ The reason leading to Lecram's decision not to proceed is, principally, that the financial condition of Purplebricks was found to be significantly worse than expected.’

One wonders how you can publicly say the above if as an insider ? Presumably you must be an insider to get an insight into the finances ? But then how can you possibly announce that they are worse than expected without breaking some insider rules ?

[kramreklaw] 31/5/2023 14:42

Why and by whom? From this afternoon's RNS: "The reason leading to Lecram's decision not to proceed is, principally, that the financial condition of Purplebricks was found to be significantly worse than expected."

[kirk 6] 31/5/2023 12:03

Better offer could be tabled now

[farrugia] 30/5/2023 08:33

i'm out at a very modest profit.

[kreature] 29/5/2023 17:10

Anyone know why this junk is trading 0.16 above Lecham’s offer ? Also, is Leham’s offer a ‘firm proposal’ in the eyes of the takeover code ?

[kreature] 27/5/2023 13:49

z, whatever

[z1co] 27/5/2023 09:55

And what makes you think that i have invested in this pile of poo ??

[z1co] 27/5/2023 09:50

K

That's not what i asked you :-)

[kreature] 27/5/2023 09:47

z, nice to see you. Welcome. I take it you are fully invested here for the long term ?

[z1co] 27/5/2023 09:42

K

Try to explain to me why you invested in this pile of poo that has cost you almost 100%.

And you still think that you're a expert in investing in the right companies.

[kreature] 27/5/2023 09:33

C4J mention code 2.8......but don't explain the certain exceptions to the rule, or that Strike never made a firm proposal according to the RNS ? Funny how they highlight that 2.8 concern after me. I guess they're obliged to read all of this rubbish on here?

Anyways......hope the FCA is in the audience

[kreature] 27/5/2023 09:17

oh what a surprise. its theatre, and better edit that

[kramreklaw] 26/5/2023 23:40

Somebody heard you, Kreature: hxxps://propertyindustryeye.com/eye-newsflash-major-blow-for-purplebricks-as-legal-row-puts-strike-deal-in-jeopardy/

I think this might be it (finally).

[kreature] 26/5/2023 19:02

I reckon the whole strike thing is like a ruse. That’s just my own personal opinion tho, so gfy ;)

[powereddrones] 26/5/2023 17:39

Uh this one passed me buy. This has really fallen from grace. So any chance has some value. OK the chance this was going to be the next Rightmove-ship has long sailed...

[kreature] 26/5/2023 17:23

If Strike are out of the way, will the bod honour their promise to ef off, and let Lecram and wad take over ?

[kreature] 26/5/2023 15:54

Under rule 2.8 does that void Strikes ability to make a firm proposal for 6 months now that Lecram have expressed an interest ? Strike never made ‘a firm proposal’ after first saying they were not interested. Would explain why the Lecram offer is lower ?

[jameshendrix2023] 26/5/2023 15:11

Ridiculous

[tomboyb] 26/5/2023 15:10

hxxps://static1.squarespace.com/static/635fb5fd1220164be2d118f4/t/636a4c3fbed1fc603a4f8412/1667910722036/Letter+for+circulation.pdf

Letter in Nov last year complaining of an share price of 11p -

Now 0.50p offer -