Oxus Gold Share Discussion Threads

[kun aguero1] 29/11/2015 15:45

ross, suits me.

[nicobellic] 29/11/2015 14:13

Kun tYou do spout an awful lot of nonsense. I bet you love conspiracy theories....

[pennyfalls] 29/11/2015 14:09

Rarely post ON HERE Kun(ty)

Oh and since you're plugging me with your kindness and wise words of warmth, I'm called Pettycash on LSE and I spout a lot of rubbish there too.
Hugs X

[kun aguero1] 29/11/2015 14:07

I repeat, I should tell a thing like pennyfalls something to our distinct advantage. pennyfalls? you rarely post, iii is awash with you`r rubbish.

[papillon] 29/11/2015 14:06

The RUR UNCITRAL verdict came out of hours:

"31 January 2014

Rurelec PLC

("Rurelec" or "the Company")

Further re: Timing of Bolivian Compensation Award

Rurelec PLC (AIM: RUR), the owner, operator and developer of power generation capacity internationally, today announces that the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague has confirmed that the Bolivian compensation award decision will be released after market hours today.

As soon as practicable following the release of the award decision, Rurelec will place a summary of the award decision on its website www.rurelec.com. The Summary will be notified to the London Stock Exchange at 7 a.m. on Monday 3 February."

[pennyfalls] 29/11/2015 13:40

Ps...The RAB situation has been known about for ages - NOTHING NEW in there people

[pennyfalls] 29/11/2015 13:36

Oh and Kun...
If you care to even do basic research you'd find some results do come at weekends and out of hours.
It's easy to call someone stupid on here..especially when the board s full of small-minded a*rse lickers.

Just becuase I don't post much anymore, doesn't mean I haven't been around here ages.
It's all bees said - but this boards has been pretty toxic for a while, due to people like you and pocket-sycophant, Dave and his attendant Dullness.

I'll leave you once more to your blinkered love in.

[pennyfalls] 29/11/2015 13:29

dave - you're such a conceited little toady...euuurgh

[pennyfalls] 29/11/2015 13:28

Deary me...
anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the original arbitration document was a statement of intent by Amsterdam, stating at that time, what they expected to be claiming for - not less than $400Mill.
This was a baseline figure to be further quantified.

This was then quantified by Ernset & Young as being up to $1.2Billion.

This range of $500Mill to $1.2billion is the claim range..

And from past cases we've seen this is rarely achieved - I'm not going to go through it again, but the recent links have shown FACTUALLY that 80% of claimants lose - a loss also includes getting lower than 20% of claimed amount.

Do yourselves a favour and open your mind and not just mindlessly ramp.

[dave444] 29/11/2015 11:43

I completely agree Stig - too many doom mongers on here!

[the stigologist] 29/11/2015 11:21

This is why it is impossible to rule out an award easily exceeding $1bn...

[dave444] 29/11/2015 10:58

Just ignore the idiot KUN - good at posting part of an announcement.
Bottom line is resolution 1 is sunk and nobody knows about resolution 2.
Management advice:
12 Recommendation

The Directors consider that Resolution 1 is not in the best interests of the Company and its Shareholders as a whole. The Directors unanimously recommend that Shareholders vote against Resolution 1, and in favour of Resolution 2, to be proposed at the EGM as they intend to do in respect of their own beneficial shareholdings, which in aggregate amount to 150,000 Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 0.23 per cent. of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company (excluding treasury shares).

[kun aguero1] 29/11/2015 09:56

another know all, jaf, these people are extraordinarily stupid.

[luckyman3] 29/11/2015 09:46

Jaf1948
Well said and totally agree with you.
We will get our good news in the very near future.
Not long till the end of the year.

[jaf1948] 29/11/2015 09:21

May I remind readers that anyone who professes to 'know' something about RAB, OXS or any related subject that the rest of us don't know about, actually knows no more than anyone else.

If RS can say many weeks ago that we would know 'in the very near future', and even he gets that wrong, then no poster on an insignificant bulletin board can possible know anything that is not already in the public domain

[kun aguero1] 29/11/2015 08:48

pennyfalls a spiteful comment like will really entice me to educate you.

Go back to the iii site where you and david can spout rubbish.

[pennyfalls] 28/11/2015 22:46

Edit...
apologies, Strike that..

Kun...

We all knew what RAB were doing...wooooo big secrets in between the lines! NOT

Dave..

Stop the childish "we know what you don;t know " lark - and pray tell us what we're all missing with the RAB RNS? AS far as I can see, we knew all about that..

I'd like a long explanation please since we're obviously missing something really vital...

[dave444] 28/11/2015 19:59

If you can count it is obvious!

[kun aguero1] 28/11/2015 19:03

ross? you mean you don't know? shame on such a bear. I will leave you now, to work it out, maybe G.S will know.

[kun aguero1] 28/11/2015 18:31

All "EXPERTS" very quiet on the RAB rns, why? they don't understand the ramifications.