Oxus Gold Share Discussion Threads

[burnleymoonbeam] 14/10/2015 08:24

GS .... what happens to the lil' red letter in, "In the very near future", if/when we reach day 20.

I hope you've thought of something original, 'cos I'll be a bit disappointed with ya, if I see a red "I" at the beginning of the sentence.

The mind boggles ...... I wonder what you've got in store for us :)

[giant steps] 14/10/2015 08:22

apfindley, exactly (#25752)

[deanroberthunt] 14/10/2015 08:21

bully

tighter than a gnats chuff, like the bollies

[bulldog30] 14/10/2015 08:21

I note the buyer who pays over the offer price to acquire 150,000 shares. Shows that the market is tight and I believe that this also happened yesterday.

[apfindley] 14/10/2015 08:19

The article is nonsense.It is actually a heavily skewed ramp towards Churchill.It dismisses OXS claim as a gamble, and only says upto 400m, yet we all know that's the lowest end.The author speaks nonsense about the recent Darwin agreement, and speaks nonsense about insolvency, basing it purely on us giving the nomad payment in shares. That does not reflect the finances of the company.He then leaves Oxus and goes on to speak more about churchill, as though it's a foregone conclusion, and that their award is guaranteed and even puts an inflated figure on their shareprice, saying they will get a payout which would be a lot higher than Oxus.The reality however is far different.Oxus claim is far more advanced.Also Oxus claim has a far higher chance of success, and of the award being a higher percent of the claimed ammount, due to Oxus actually owning a mine and being a producer, whereas Churchill were just an Explorer.Furthermore, we are financed by both a litigation funder to take care of legal costs, and Darwin for working capital IF required. Churchill however need to tap the market for funds.The author clearly ramps Churchill in the article.

[giant steps] 14/10/2015 08:17

Slingshot moment ? ...

[marmar80] 14/10/2015 08:15

I like the article as there are not many of them on the internet. Would love one in the national newspaper..

[goodbloke1] 14/10/2015 08:01

The guy who posted award surely would be open to prosecution if he was lying?Is it worth risking being caught so inclined to think there is something in story

[pug151] 14/10/2015 07:55

As we have been with this story for ever we can see at once when somebody does this.

[pug151] 14/10/2015 07:53

MaytreesHe is not being conservative ( which i would agree with) he is being careless Or disingenuous with the facts of the claim and financial situation.

[andysaw] 14/10/2015 07:43

It is interesting to see the traders getting in and out for small profits when the news may come in anytime. Our position looks extremely strong in the arbitration, so like most others my stake will help the share price to be above 4 and eventually the lower resistance will be pushed up IMO. In the end, actually it doesn't matter as I'm in till the end to see a multibagger IMO. ATB

[maytrees] 14/10/2015 07:40

Good morning
Many TX marma80 - read the article with interest - the author imho is right to be conservative.

[giant steps] 14/10/2015 07:28

In the very near future

... 14 days on close watch, news beckons


Tick tock

[giant steps] 14/10/2015 07:06

mm80, thanks but no thanks - clearly he is not well read in Oxus.

He states up to $400m, yet RS has consistently said not less than $400m
and independent valuations give in excess of a billion dollars.

[marmar80] 14/10/2015 00:47

Is The Risk Worth The Reward At Oxus Gold plc And Churchill Mining Plc?
same article, different websites..

[skez13] 13/10/2015 22:03

martin that will be our friend twomoregins posting his rumours again

[papillon] 13/10/2015 19:16

In fact, Big7ime, the Golden Cross (50 day EMA rising above an already rising 200 day EMA) occurred in early January this year and the 50 day EMA has never dropped below the 200 day EMA since then as my chart shows.

I can't see any sign that the 50 day EMA will drop below an already falling 200 day EMA (the exact opposite of the Golden Cross) in the "next 6 weeks".

Keep taking your tablets, Big7ime. You know it makes sense! LOL.

[papillon] 13/10/2015 16:58

Big7ime
13 Oct'15 - 16:06 - 25727 of 25736 0 1


Golden Cross, you imbecile - that was in mid August, now it's unwound. The opposite applies if the two cross, heading to retest the recent low 2.5p in next 6wks

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You're the IMBECILE, Big7time!! Here's the chart that proves it.



free stock charts from uk.advfn.com

[papillon] 13/10/2015 16:54

A.Fewbob
12 Oct'15 - 22:45 - 25658 of 25735 1 0


papillion,

If calunius have put that kind of money on the line I imagine they would make sure we had pretty good legal team.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Obviously.

[maytrees] 13/10/2015 16:34

Agreed skez13 - I topped up just b4 the close as did one other and the share price reacted N-wards quickly.

[skez13] 13/10/2015 16:32

Edgein


im hoping we say below the radar for as long as we can!!!!

[the stigologist] 13/10/2015 16:28

Largest one day move in a stock ever (just for reference) is 22,000%

AFAIK

From this level a move from 4-5p to 50p would be ONLY c.1000% so not outside the bounds of possibility