We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oxus Gold | LSE:OXS | London | Ordinary Share | GB0030632714 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 3.125 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/10/2015 07:24 | GS .... what happens to the lil' red letter in, "In the very near future", if/when we reach day 20. I hope you've thought of something original, 'cos I'll be a bit disappointed with ya, if I see a red "I" at the beginning of the sentence. The mind boggles ...... I wonder what you've got in store for us :) | burnleymoonbeam | |
14/10/2015 07:22 | apfindley, exactly (#25752) | giant steps | |
14/10/2015 07:21 | bully tighter than a gnats chuff, like the bollies | deanroberthunt | |
14/10/2015 07:21 | I note the buyer who pays over the offer price to acquire 150,000 shares. Shows that the market is tight and I believe that this also happened yesterday. | bulldog30 | |
14/10/2015 07:19 | The article is nonsense.It is actually a heavily skewed ramp towards Churchill.It dismisses OXS claim as a gamble, and only says upto 400m, yet we all know that's the lowest end.The author speaks nonsense about the recent Darwin agreement, and speaks nonsense about insolvency, basing it purely on us giving the nomad payment in shares. That does not reflect the finances of the company.He then leaves Oxus and goes on to speak more about churchill, as though it's a foregone conclusion, and that their award is guaranteed and even puts an inflated figure on their shareprice, saying they will get a payout which would be a lot higher than Oxus.The reality however is far different.Oxus claim is far more advanced.Also Oxus claim has a far higher chance of success, and of the award being a higher percent of the claimed ammount, due to Oxus actually owning a mine and being a producer, whereas Churchill were just an Explorer.Furthermore | apfindley | |
14/10/2015 07:17 | Slingshot moment ? ... | giant steps | |
14/10/2015 07:15 | I like the article as there are not many of them on the internet. Would love one in the national newspaper.. | marmar80 | |
14/10/2015 07:01 | The guy who posted award surely would be open to prosecution if he was lying?Is it worth risking being caught so inclined to think there is something in story | goodbloke1 | |
14/10/2015 06:55 | As we have been with this story for ever we can see at once when somebody does this. | pug151 | |
14/10/2015 06:53 | MaytreesHe is not being conservative ( which i would agree with) he is being careless Or disingenuous with the facts of the claim and financial situation. | pug151 | |
14/10/2015 06:43 | It is interesting to see the traders getting in and out for small profits when the news may come in anytime. Our position looks extremely strong in the arbitration, so like most others my stake will help the share price to be above 4 and eventually the lower resistance will be pushed up IMO. In the end, actually it doesn't matter as I'm in till the end to see a multibagger IMO. ATB | andysaw | |
14/10/2015 06:40 | Good morning Many TX marma80 - read the article with interest - the author imho is right to be conservative. | maytrees | |
14/10/2015 06:28 | In the very near future ... 14 days on close watch, news beckons Tick tock | giant steps | |
14/10/2015 06:06 | mm80, thanks but no thanks - clearly he is not well read in Oxus. He states up to $400m, yet RS has consistently said not less than $400m and independent valuations give in excess of a billion dollars. | giant steps | |
13/10/2015 23:47 | Is The Risk Worth The Reward At Oxus Gold plc And Churchill Mining Plc? same article, different websites.. | marmar80 | |
13/10/2015 21:03 | martin that will be our friend twomoregins posting his rumours again | skez13 | |
13/10/2015 18:16 | In fact, Big7ime, the Golden Cross (50 day EMA rising above an already rising 200 day EMA) occurred in early January this year and the 50 day EMA has never dropped below the 200 day EMA since then as my chart shows. I can't see any sign that the 50 day EMA will drop below an already falling 200 day EMA (the exact opposite of the Golden Cross) in the "next 6 weeks". Keep taking your tablets, Big7ime. You know it makes sense! LOL. | papillon | |
13/10/2015 15:58 | Big7ime 13 Oct'15 - 16:06 - 25727 of 25736 0 1 Golden Cross, you imbecile - that was in mid August, now it's unwound. The opposite applies if the two cross, heading to retest the recent low 2.5p in next 6wks >>>>> You're the IMBECILE, Big7time!! Here's the chart that proves it. free stock charts from uk.advfn.com | papillon | |
13/10/2015 15:54 | A.Fewbob 12 Oct'15 - 22:45 - 25658 of 25735 1 0 papillion, If calunius have put that kind of money on the line I imagine they would make sure we had pretty good legal team. >>>>> Obviously. | papillon | |
13/10/2015 15:34 | Agreed skez13 - I topped up just b4 the close as did one other and the share price reacted N-wards quickly. | maytrees | |
13/10/2015 15:32 | Edgein im hoping we say below the radar for as long as we can!!!! | skez13 | |
13/10/2015 15:28 | Largest one day move in a stock ever (just for reference) is 22,000% AFAIK From this level a move from 4-5p to 50p would be ONLY c.1000% so not outside the bounds of possibility | the stigologist |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com |
ADVFN UK Investors Hub ADVFN Italy ADVFN Australia ADVFN Brazil |
ADVFN Canada ADVFN Germany ADVFN Japan ADVFN Mexico |
ADVFN France ADVFN US ADVFN Korea |