We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oxus Gold | LSE:OXS | London | Ordinary Share | GB0030632714 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 3.125 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
12/10/2015 16:50 | Maytrees.I wouldn't believe anything written on the other thread.It's a pure fantasy thread for rampers who have admitted a history of multiple usernames. Endless False claims (2yrs+) of mates in the city and news tomorrow. And more recently they have a cling-on who used two names on this thread earlier in the year to ramp/deramp this thread based on whether he was invested.Anything over there is lies. Don't succumb to it.I have both them on filter, so I dont read their postings. | apfindley | |
12/10/2015 16:35 | Any further information about the reported death (on the other thread) of one of the arbitrators? Presumably from the arbitration viewpoint there is provision in the arbitration agreement as to the implications. If sadly there has been a death may s/he RIP. | maytrees | |
12/10/2015 16:30 | Wulber and Rosann I do not read Stern dissent that way. She is trying to say in my view, that you cannot get both the reinstatement/cash spent loss as well as a inclusive FV based DCF value. That is the point, the sunk costs should never be included in any DCF, with which I agree. The problem in misappropriated assets is that in her mind, the DCF is using hindsight to make a judgement, where as if the 'reinstatement' values could be ascertained this, for non producing assets would be somewhat different. Anyone agree with this? It's a complex legalistic problem all to do with the evidence and logic of the science of conjecture in each case. The value of all the evidence from each side becomes difficult to ascertain perhaps, thus, the remedy value to be awarded by the tribunal not an easy one. I use the 'Option to Mine' value for assets in the ground, which logically gives a very reasonable value for any owner or 'quasi disponent' owner. | orgasmicbeef | |
12/10/2015 15:52 | Rossannan Yes I agree, Brigitte Stern would certainly disagree with a historic DCF valuation on AGF if her past comments were anything to go by. BUT...... as arbitration in these cases is based on a majority, I think OXS will prevail triumphant. Arbitration cases cited above vary significantly from simply raw material proprietors with assets in the ground, to fully fledged operating and producing mines. As a result, compensation will also vary enormously from 100% award for producers to fractional awards for non-producers. | wulber | |
12/10/2015 15:36 | Believe that you will believe anything.. | pug151 | |
12/10/2015 15:30 | I really dont know what the point of the comment was by RS, I am beginning to think it was more out of hope than expectation, as each day passes it looks more and more likely that there was no intent in the statement. | slong | |
12/10/2015 15:26 | DCF is the ONLY real method for valuation on a producing mine. Also, as mentioned Khandiza is an unknown quantity £ - see it as a bonus if something comes through, nominal amount or sweet fa. In all likelihood the arbitrators will backdate the DCF to the time the mine stopped production, where $/gold was much higher than now and why personally I think the AGF award will be at the top end of valuations DYOR. | wulber | |
12/10/2015 15:07 | And yes DCF will be used, especially considering we were operating a producing mine with a throughput that can be verified, and proven to have taken place.This wasn't just exploration, it was production. A proven asset was in the ground. We were extracting it at a cost, and selling at a profit.There is really not much alternative to DCF in this instance, and the above is the main reason we will get back the full "Proven" value. | apfindley | |
12/10/2015 14:58 | peni falls DCF is the standard valuation case in all the arbitrations I have studied, for a good example see Gold Reserves. | orgasmicbeef | |
12/10/2015 14:49 | There was a hot Uzzie called Goo Goo, Who found herself in the doo doo, Cos she robbed everyone blind, Yes, even her own kind, And stole Amantaytu off you too. | 99jeremiah | |
12/10/2015 13:15 | I like it quiet like this.Order book nicely balanced. Sshhhh! | festario | |
12/10/2015 12:41 | What's the Hold Up with newsWhen will the Robber-(baron) compensateFor the CrimesWill they Broker(man) a dealLol sorry GS, couldn't resist | apfindley | |
12/10/2015 12:26 | Very near future. Is now even nearer ha | webshares | |
12/10/2015 12:11 | O/T Folk are reminded to keep matters polite and on topic - thank you #25612 is posted by a premium a/c so cannot be moderated | giant steps | |
12/10/2015 12:08 | GS - any chance of some O/T moderation? Edit: thanks GS. | wilfy75 | |
12/10/2015 11:47 | FYI Dan x | daniel levi bmd | |
12/10/2015 11:44 | A decade of creeping expropriation Fair compensation not less than $400m beckons | giant steps | |
12/10/2015 11:39 | "The dialogue / language from the arbitrators point towards full settlement of AGF" Where is this dialogue? | psyclops1 | |
12/10/2015 11:31 | Riskier, I think you are massively under estimating and hope you are pleasantly surprised soon. The dialogue / language from the arbitrators point towards full settlement of AGF, Khandiza is an unknown | wulber | |
12/10/2015 11:30 | riskier on your valuation on a win with the share price of 10p it will be at 50% or so discount due to chasing for payment etc and so it will be 5p. If that is what you expect what's the point of hanging around for 10% from current share price on a win? | 78steve |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com |
ADVFN UK Investors Hub ADVFN Italy ADVFN Australia ADVFN Brazil |
ADVFN Canada ADVFN Germany ADVFN Japan ADVFN Mexico |
ADVFN France ADVFN US ADVFN Korea |