ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

LHD Lochard Energy

4.875
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lochard Energy LSE:LHD London Ordinary Share GB00B02YHV99 ORD 5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 4.875 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Lochard Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 3401 to 3420 of 3925 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  145  144  143  142  141  140  139  138  137  136  135  134  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
24/5/2013
07:09
Reminder

RNS 24th May 2013 - Irrevocable Undertakings 41.4% - James Brooke not in the list

giant steps
24/5/2013
07:08
Reminder

RNS 24th May 2013 - Irrevocable Undertakings 41.4% - James Brooke not in the list

giant steps
23/5/2013
22:23
Here is the same story from TheScotsman:
wbodger
23/5/2013
19:20
Your reminder :



Giant Steps
21 May'13 - 07:53 - 1858 of 1870 0 0 edit

Therealdeal5, why do you persist to double count the same holding
re Jamie Brooke and Henderson Global ?



LHD Reminder from 12th September 2012



Note 1: James Brooke's interest relates to his position as investment manager with Henderson Global Investors Limited which holds 86,651,883 shares in Lochard

Therealdeal5
21 May'13 - 07:56 - 1859 of 1870 0 0

GS, how is it the same holding? please explain? numbers are totally different here, percentages are different, i spoke with TD Investments they have confirmed what i have said, so you are wrong. why do you persist to say it's the same holding?

giant steps
23/5/2013
19:15
Therealdeal5, i await your apology





Therealdeal5, do you understand the reminder as noted below ?

Your understanding of Jamie Brooke and Henderson's holdings is a nonsense.
You have double counted - do you agree ?

Using your rule they would control over 60%, and that is not the case.



Reminder

"
Whilst none of the Lochard Directors are directly interested in any Lochard Shares, Jamie Brooke, a non-executive Director of Lochard, is also an employee of Henderson Global Investors Limited. Funds managed by Henderson Global Investors Limited and Henderson Alternative Investment Advisor Limited are interested in 93,926,577 Lochard Shares, representing approximately 31.4 per cent. of the issued ordinary share capital of Lochard. Parkmead has received irrevocable undertakings from Henderson Global Investors Limited and Henderson Alternative Investment Advisor Limited to vote, or procure the vote, in favour of the Scheme and the resolutions at the Court Meeting and the General Meeting in respect of such 93,926,577 Lochard Shares, representing approximately 31.4 per cent. of the issued ordinary share capital of Lochard.
"

giant steps
23/5/2013
18:46
If that clown (trd5) is going to come back from a parallel universe every few minutes with another nutty opinion based on bizarre facts I rather hope this is concluded sooner rather than later. I don't think I can take much more of it!

Anyway to more sensible matters. There is no reason for IAE to play their hand too early. I always thought the first bid would be a low-ball. If TC gets LHD for peanuts fair play to him but if he plans to get to 75% by the end of June he has to get more than half of the shares he does not currently have. He needs another 35%, and the shareholders who don't want this only have to get 25%.

He has carefully reserved the right to make a Takeover Offer which would mean a proxy fight but presumably a lower majority. Doesn't sound too confident.

wbodger
23/5/2013
18:27
I know IAE were looking at LHD as well a few months back.
utrecht_00
23/5/2013
18:12
Idiot.

IAE is not Dyas. Edit your error.

wbodger
23/5/2013
18:08
your best bet is that previous management manage to get in a higher bid than 4.9p Gardner will want his company back by hook or by crook me thinks, lol but will he even get to get a bid in? I did say all the secrecy and back room deals were dodgy here, I also knew TC was pulling the strings here, it's how he works. Your best bet is Hayden Gardner gets his wallet out even 5 p is better than 4.9p lol would that buy it?

GLTA

therealdeal5
23/5/2013
16:48
Come on Ithaca. A shares and cash deal please. Would be happy with shares as they have a decent portfolio.
utrecht_00
23/5/2013
16:02
Reminder of the deal


LHD 4.9p vs PMG 12.625p, conversion rate 0.385
(298,865,616 Lochard Shares for £14.5m)
So shares required to be issued by PMG is about 115m

PMG ords 921m (@ 28MAR 2013)


So PMG forecast dilution is about 12.5%


Current prices : LHD 4.75p-5p, PMG 11.75-12p
LHD conversion equiv 4.52p-4.62p (using 0.385)

giant steps
23/5/2013
15:44
Falklands
14 Jan'13 - 09:34 - 39 of 1513 1 0

Yep the thicko mob are selling lhd getting blocks back just with a new operator.

Cannot understand in under three months time offer on the table.

Best to not look every day this week and come back

kev0856153
23/5/2013
15:34
Great - thanks for the updates
giant steps
23/5/2013
15:30
Cheers few city mates tweeting me on chrisoil twitter iae bid rumours on the cards.

we going to proxy fight Tom !

falklands
23/5/2013
15:21
Its a very small break fee. Probably just PMG's assessment of how much they have spent on schmoozing.

(Thanks for #1507, F)

wbodger
23/5/2013
15:08
maybe there will still be a counter offer here.
utrecht_00
23/5/2013
14:12
hendersons will simply have to pay 5p+ in the market to get control imo

edit : perhaps Haydn Gardner has a plan.

giant steps
23/5/2013
14:10
yes i phoned round and iae are interested still imo hence why no ones really dumped shares today
falklands
23/5/2013
12:19
Agree with IAE's watchest it would not make a dent. Interesting times ahead.
utrecht_00
23/5/2013
11:18
Ut, I always thought the structure of the VPP deal was about JEC. IAE could have offered more paper if they'd wanted, but JEC would just have used it to increase their holdings of IAE.

IAE could offer all cash here, and simply absorb the balance of the Gemini debt, or if they think JEC has gone away, all paper. Or most likely a cash-alternative paper offer. It still looks awfully cheap for Ithaca to increase their share of a good field.

wbodger
Chat Pages: Latest  145  144  143  142  141  140  139  138  137  136  135  134  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock