Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[diku] 15/7/2020 09:34

The youngsters of today are not interested in pension pots...and the middle age have seen what goes on with their pension pots recently with their investments in the casino markets...every few years stock markets crashes...even the house hold names are the biggest under performers...the likes of Scottish Widows was popular once upon a time in the 70,s 80's and 90,s...

[portside1] 15/7/2020 09:30

300million more shares added in10 weeks It's fraudulent but their pals in remuneration are the criminals So that they get good free bonuses ,The bank run by crooks ,

[chavitravi2] 15/7/2020 09:28

There are good companies out there that will sort the tax side out for you and re invest but what is left after you are gone stays with your estate and family not lost to the pension Co.

[chavitravi2] 15/7/2020 09:23

Never leave your pension IN when you retire, take it all out and pay the tax on the 3/4's that's not tax free. Seems odd I know but you will do better re investing it and have the peace of mind that when you kick the bucket what's left goes to you family and not kept by the pension company. True they may pay your wife part of the pension you were getting but when she goes so does your money that's left.

[gabble ratchet] 15/7/2020 09:18

Thanks for that

[gabble ratchet] 15/7/2020 09:10

Well, my straw poll of friends and work colleagues suggests that the majority will be less likely to visit a shop if they have to wear a mask and will continue to shop online. Not good for the high street but good for ASOS, Amazon etc I guess.

[portside1] 15/7/2020 08:56

Diku one thing is for sure the fca pra are crooks and liars They are the problem As for pension fund managers Any one putting money into a pension are fools The working class will never see any benefit from a private pension . All it will do is stop them getting any help .They will be far worse off than those that spent their money to enjoy life

[geckotheglorious] 15/7/2020 08:54

Anyone have a final count for the number of posts Minerve made yesterday??

[geckotheglorious] 15/7/2020 08:53

Maxk,

Because people don't seem to have the common sense to wear them is why!!!

[geckotheglorious] 15/7/2020 08:52

Graham,

Ah righto.
Cautios is a nut job, so no wonder he is a global warming fanatic.

I'm more of the persuasion that we are entering a global cooling period myself.

The Polar shift and its implications are something else I am also interested.

[diku] 15/7/2020 08:50

porty..it is the hands of pension fundies and big institutional investors...how many investors saw a decent return on their Lloy investment in the last 11 years?...in comparison to the amount of money and shares paid out to insiders?...

[portside1] 15/7/2020 08:42

Since April 300 million more shares issued to directors The directors are silent crooks , the chairman is a mute ,We need a egm and vote out all of them

[diku] 15/7/2020 08:32

Too many sucked in around this level...market wants to lock them in...

[xxxxxy] 15/7/2020 08:19

Patricia Bullock15 Jul 2020 8:16AMNO NO NO NO NO! All public places, workplaces......this has got to to stop! Imagine sitting in a large office surrounded by all your colleagues, a sea of faceless drones. All non verbal communication erased, all that makes us look human. It's degrading and dehumanising! This is dystopia, welcome to Gilead!

[diku] 15/7/2020 08:19

Chinese were wearing masks well before Coronavirus thingy...due dust/smog/pollution in the air...is that why fewer deaths which many don't believe...

[mikemichael2] 15/7/2020 08:01

Jacko, your posts are causing Min to 'blow his top' ranting and raving all night long with an ever increasing state of intoxication, seems he finally passed out around 11.

Keep it up, with a bit of luck his late starts might start around 5pm.

[xxxxxy] 15/7/2020 07:35

National resilienceBy JOHNREDWOOD | Published: JULY 15, 2020Yesterday in the Commons the Culture and Digital Secretary announced a change of policy for the roll out of 5G mobile telephony. Following new official advice on national security , the government decided to ban Huawei components in the 5G network from the end of this year, and to work away to remove Huawei altogether by 2027.The government accepted this would delay provision of the new network by between 2 and 3 years and could cost an extra £2bn. The Minister given the job of explaining this stressed that national security must come first, so this was a necessary price to pay.This was a crucial moment in the evolution of UK policy. It marked a decisive departure from the pro China approach of the previous 15 years, where buying more them whatever the degree of sensitivity of the product or component was fine. Our policy towards China was based on the proposition that they would do us no harm and be there for us when we need their supplies. It was a grand partnership where we became more dependent.The immediate trigger was a tougher US stance limiting Huawei's ability to make and export. The further deterioration in the relationship over Hong Kong, the treatment of minorities in China, the aggressive approach to the South China Sea and the action on the Indian border also influenced the decision.The UK needs to have enough control over strategic networks and over crucial intellectual property for our wider security. Immediately the UK needs to catch up with the leaders in mobile telephony.

[scruff1] 15/7/2020 04:58

Tree shake - ha ha

[johncasey] 14/7/2020 23:47

dow up 800 since ftse closed