ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

55.14
0.40 (0.73%)
Last Updated: 10:03:01
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.40 0.73% 55.14 55.14 55.16 55.20 54.50 54.66 16,049,058 10:03:01
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0859 6.41 35B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 54.74p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 39.55p to 57.22p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 63,569,225,662 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £35 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.41.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 316501 to 316520 of 427750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  12670  12669  12668  12667  12666  12665  12664  12663  12662  12661  12660  12659  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
05/6/2020
16:09
PC - why was it particularly noteworthy about BASF?
alphorn
05/6/2020
15:58
Your farm will be looking for handouts soon patient. People in glass houses and all that. :)
minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:57
The political agreement was signed when BORIS WAS IN POWER!
minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:57
Have to say. The EUSSR is a load of FAECES.No Deal
xxxxxy
05/6/2020
15:56
"German chemicals giant BASF has emerged as the largest recipient of the Bank of England’s Covid-19 "

WHO CARES? IF THEY QUALIFY SO WHAT?

At least it is a rather large blue chip chemicals company and not some dodgy unaccountable outfit linked to a Tory donor.

minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:54
maxk

It doesn't matter who agreed it. It was agreed by the UK government and that is all we need to know. All because we change Tory leaders like the weather is no fault of the EU's and if we had sincerity and integrity - you know, what decent people used to have - then we would honour that agreement whether we like it or not and even if it is to our detriment. There is a very severe cost to be paid when integrity is lost. If you don't like the agreement blame the Tory party for its incompetent don't blame Barnier.

minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:54
Interesting"The German chemicals giant BASF has emerged as the largest recipient of the Bank of England's Covid-19 emergency funding scheme despite only employing 834 people in Britain" The Times
patientcapital
05/6/2020
15:48
Min.

That one sided agreement was a Treeza and Olly production.

It cost her job in the end. And never got it approved.

Boris was elected on a quite different mandate.

maxk
05/6/2020
15:42
No competitive tenders. No accountability. Just corrupt government. We might as well have Putin. At least he is a proper leader. A man amongst men and would whip poor little Boris in a mind or physical fight.
minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:40
Billions going to the mates of Boris and co and it is OUR money taxpayers. I just don't get how this doesn't make you morons angry.
minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:38
Anyone remember Cambridge Analytica?

Anyone following Faculty and Palantir? The contracts now released show that the companies involved, including Faculty and Palantir, were originally granted intellectual property rights (including the creation of databases), and were allowed to train their models and profit off their unprecedented access to NHS data.

Anyone have links to these guys?

alphorn
05/6/2020
15:37
maxk

There was a political declaration that both sides spent a great deal of time on and agreed last year. If Boris and Co are just going to run a steamroller through it all like a group of spoilt public school boys what was the point putting all the effort in to agreeing one in the first place? More importantly, what sort of message does this send out to other countries we are looking to do business with?


Come on, please grow up, we are not in your world of window and toilet cleaning for a fiver here and a tenner there. This is the UK government!

minerve 2
05/6/2020
15:01
Bowl formation
smurfy2001
05/6/2020
14:38
All unions not looking good imho .
bargainbob
05/6/2020
14:13
hxxps://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
mr.elbee
05/6/2020
13:56
Good for Trump if it holds.
grahamite2
05/6/2020
13:51
G2 - win/win was booted out the window early on.

On another subject the US jobs report just now is a bit of a surprise!

alphorn
05/6/2020
13:47
Alphorn, I am absolutely not a fan of Mr Cameron, but I don't think he bears much responsibility for what happened then. By all accounts he made it very clear that he needed some help, and that the situation in England was distinctly unsettled.

But this was when the EU did not do compromise. At all. They told people the way it was going to be and that was that.

How much they have changed remains to be seen.

grahamite2
05/6/2020
13:44
Pleased they did offer him FA. If they had we would have still been in the EU.
Now is our chance, get out and stay out.

excell1
05/6/2020
13:42
G2 - as with whirlwinds there is often collateral damage.

(I agree btw that Cameron was weak/treated badly or both at the outset).

alphorn
Chat Pages: Latest  12670  12669  12668  12667  12666  12665  12664  12663  12662  12661  12660  12659  Older