ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

LLOY Lloyds Banking Group Plc

54.74
-1.34 (-2.39%)
28 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lloyds Banking Group Plc LSE:LLOY London Ordinary Share GB0008706128 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.34 -2.39% 54.74 54.88 54.92 56.56 54.28 56.38 202,108,354 16:35:15
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Commercial Banks, Nec 23.74B 5.46B 0.0859 6.39 34.87B
Lloyds Banking Group Plc is listed in the Commercial Banks sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker LLOY. The last closing price for Lloyds Banking was 56.08p. Over the last year, Lloyds Banking shares have traded in a share price range of 39.55p to 57.22p.

Lloyds Banking currently has 63,569,225,662 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Lloyds Banking is £34.87 billion. Lloyds Banking has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.39.

Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

Showing 265126 to 265147 of 429500 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  10616  10615  10614  10613  10612  10611  10610  10609  10608  10607  10606  10605  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
19/6/2019
08:41
Did Boris promise to take us out in Oct? I think he did at one stage early in the debate, buy he wouldn't answer the direct question someone put to the lot of them asking if they would gtee taking us out in Oct. He had the chacge to reiterate what he had said before, but afair, he didn't say an explicit yes when questioned directly. None of them did, with the suicidal candidates explicitly saying they would extend the leaving date! ffs!
shy tott
19/6/2019
08:20
Swizzerlands turn in the barrel..
maxk
19/6/2019
08:19
Boris was on a hiding to nothing last night, everything to lose, nothing to gain.


Hence, stay as quiet as possible.

maxk
19/6/2019
08:14
It's very easy to be a fool very hard to act one,Boris is no fool just wait and see.
pooroldboy55
19/6/2019
08:11
Much interesting discussion on The Telegraph of a Boris-Nigel electoral pact. Such a thing could exploit the vagaries of first past the post rather than suffering from it and produce a massive leave majority in the Commons even on a minority of the vote.

The main difficulty is that so main Brexit Party people don't trust the Conservative Party as far as they could throw a grand piano. Mrs May's legacy of dishonesty and deceit casts a long shadow.

grahamite2
19/6/2019
08:09
Wazul Chipmutt 19 Jun 2019 7:38AM

Last night was an interview to see who could be a leader. Congratulations Rory. You've got the Liberal Democrat job!

maxk
19/6/2019
08:02
Rubbish, it reiterated that Boris is a fool
inaminute
19/6/2019
07:59
John Redwood
@johnredwood
·
12h
Boris is the only PM candidate now who has promised to get us out of the EU by 31 October. This is crucial to restore some trust in our politics.

xxxxxy
19/6/2019
07:57
Then there were five

By JOHNREDWOOD | Published: JUNE 19, 2019

The elimination of only one contender drags out the contest a bit longer. The contest anyway has become a race for second place, to see who would be best to go up against Boris in the lengthier phase of the contest appealing to the members in the country. I think a Johnson/Hunt contest would be best.

It was unfortunate that Rory Stewart wishes to turn the contest into a re run of the referendum, in denial of the clear stance for Brexit all Conservatives put to the electorate in order to become MPs in 2017. He studiously avoided even contacting many Conservative MPs he knew to be committed to our 2017 promises, preferring to attract the support and good wishes of the media, especially the BBC, and sections of the general public wanting a second referendum. He then claims he could get the completely unacceptable Withdrawal Treaty through the Commons after its three big defeats.

The contest has had an unreal air for another reason. Several of the candidates claimed they could renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement in time for our exit on 31 October. There has never been any glimmer of reason to suppose the EU would enter deep and serious talks about rewriting the Agreement, or that such work could be completed between the end of July and the end of September allowing time to ratify the Agreement by both sides.

The BBC debate was dreadful. It was set up and chaired badly so we learned little. There was no wish to allow or require a serious discussion of the major issues facing the country. Boris was constantly interrupted by the presenter and the BBC pursued its agenda to make sure the candidates could not discuss the great opportunities that follow if we just get on and leave.

xxxxxy
19/6/2019
00:14
Oh good, BA orders a few hundred 737 maxs.

Let's hope they're not still grounded when they take delivery. Perhaps another Heathrow extension would be needed to park them all until they could fly (probably empty) again.

shy tott
19/6/2019
00:09
Even today most of the candidates talked of an extension to the Brexit date. Looks like all we'll get as pm is May number 2.
shy tott
19/6/2019
00:05
The remainers see May's deal (actually a misnomer, it's the eu's deal) as top totty because the deal doesn't actually take us out of the eu and we'd be intertwined with eu institutions for ever.

It's May's deal, the eu deal, Brexit in name only, the remainers' deal. May's actions were just the actions you'd expect from an arch remainer, as she was. Nothing May did made any sense at all until it's seen in the remainers' perspective, and then it makes perfect sense.

shy tott
18/6/2019
23:53
The chimps think we can support the sheep farmers, give tax cuts to the middle classes, invest in infrastructure, drop business rates and VAT, and fund the NHS more, all at the same time.

Sorry, as Rory states, it is fantasy.

Guy from Oxford was scum.

minerve 2
18/6/2019
23:17
One of us has Roger, and I think it's you.

What part of the May deal is to our advantage?

maxk
18/6/2019
23:06
EUSSR is FAIL

Boycott the Con and Labour party of QUISLINGS

LEAVE and WTO

xxxxxy
18/6/2019
23:03
Max, Clearly you have a problem understanding english. No, Mays deal is a bad deal, but it is the reality of Brexit. The only good deal is staying in with some concession in reforming the rules around freedom of movement.As for a no deal that would kiss goodbye to any tax cuts and any increase in spending on nhs, social care, education etc because the economy would take such a hit we would be hard pressed to maintain the current spend levels.
rogerrail
18/6/2019
23:03
Bojo is getting more blonde by the day...maybe he found a new hair stylist...
diku
18/6/2019
22:53
Are your lot Roger, so stupid and up themselves as to believe what May came back with if fair and equitable?



There's always no deal and wto, not ideal, but better than May's €U surrender deal.

maxk
18/6/2019
22:44
Unfortunately people don't want to hear the truth and prefer to believe fantasy and spin. Rory Stewart was the only one tonight saying it as it is, particularly with regards to tax cuts and the pressure to fund public spending first, and that idiot from Oxford who clearly had a hidden agenda tried to criticise Rory for blaming him for voting brexit which was not true. Rory is correct that the only way to get any Brexit by the 31st of Oct is to run with essentially Mays deal, it is the only one on the table and the EU have re-emphasised that tonight. The only way that is going to get through the parliament door (as it is not a good deal) is to get a consensus to put it to a public vote. That way both Labour and Tory can limit damage to their level of support.
rogerrail
18/6/2019
21:48
Cheshire Pete

Answering your earlier question on my strategy....

Investing for all of us has different objectives. For you it might be a little bit of pocket money on top of a defined benefit pension to pay for a holiday or some other one off/occasional treat. For me it is ALL my income. I have no other income from any other source. I perhaps therefore have to consider risk more than you. I tend to follow investment strategies that don't consider macro-economic issues as being too important although I do use them to look for opportunity. Those stocks that depend too much on the macro-economic environment tend not to be the types of stocks I would buy anyway. I do occasionally break from this, but not often.

My investment strategy is based on a mix of Buffett (pre-Berkshire) with Peter Lynch and a dose of Charlie Munger - if that means anything. Probably 45% Peter Lynch, 40% Buffett, 15% Munger.

It would take too long to describe their methods. You would have to read at least 4 or 5 books on Lynch and Buffet to understand how I invest. But that is it in a nutshell.

minerve 2
18/6/2019
21:32
Well, he would not answer the direct question, 'would you cancel the third runway' as he has said many times he would.

Bringing down the government does not solve brexit.

mikemichael2
18/6/2019
21:30
As a Remainer I would love for the whole thing to be cancelled but I accept that to have any chance of harmony by the majority some compromise has to be reached. If Hard-Brexit is forced through I hope the Hard-Brexiters understand they will most likely bring down their government at some point and regaining power could be lost forever.
minerve 2
Chat Pages: Latest  10616  10615  10614  10613  10612  10611  10610  10609  10608  10607  10606  10605  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock