Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Kazera Global LSE:KZG London Ordinary Share GB00B830HW33 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.10p +4.76% 2.20p 2.15p 2.25p 2.20p 2.10p 2.10p 583,440 14:44:55
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 0.0 -1.1 -0.5 - 5.65

Kazera Global Share Discussion Threads

Showing 101 to 122 of 125 messages
Chat Pages: 5  4  3  2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
23/5/2018
07:09
Thought so cheers mate
pranchalee
22/5/2018
20:42
Tommy what was ur price mate
pranchalee
22/5/2018
18:57
I've bought 200k today, undervalued at this price
tommygriff
22/5/2018
18:56
Placing happening here
tommygriff
22/5/2018
16:39
I really hope he's got AMER right paleje... juries out in my book :-(
al101uk
22/5/2018
16:30
Al, he was right on AMER:) But someone's buying and some are being mis-reported. It's easy to sell online reasonable qty, it isn't mm's soaking them up. I'll wait and see, can't add cos I had to find some cash for THR earlier, another one infected by madness. I hope its not Larry who's mad.
paleje
22/5/2018
16:21
Where is this one heading. Looking south of 2p.
e-wan
22/5/2018
16:19
paleje, JW's track record in buying GC company equity is terrible. Look at SMA where he bought a couple of months before the company de-listed. 5th October 2017 hTTp://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/SMA/13387181.html 15th January 2018 http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/SMA/13497100.html He bought Ironveld just before a placing: 30th Oct 2017 hTTp://www.ironveld.com/docs/30.10.17%20TRACARTA%20-%20TR1%20Form%20-%20IRONVELD%209.29%25.pdf 27th November 2017 hTTp://www.ironveld.com/docs/Ironveld%20Placing%20Announcement%20-%2027.11.17.pdf I've said it before, but Tracarta is not a signal of anything imminently positive.
al101uk
22/5/2018
16:12
£2.5 million in the bank with £1.4 million of cash burn in the previous six months up to December 2017. Does the change in strategy conserve cash or burn additional cash vs the upgrades... I have no idea.
al101uk
22/5/2018
15:44
Wonder why JW topped up a few weeks ago if placing imminent, doesn't make sense. Somebody's buying them anyway cos mm's will still take quantities.
paleje
22/5/2018
15:33
Looks like another fundraise from Shore Cap....I wonder how much this time?
niloc2
22/5/2018
15:26
Nearly 12% down on 5k worth of trades, that's luncheon money to Giles:)
paleje
18/5/2018
10:32
I'm pretty fully invested at the moment paleje, in companies I can at least pretend to understand, so I'm in no rush to jump in to ones where the mist hasn't cleared. If I miss the boat, then there are other fish in the sea.. assuming it's a fishing boat ;-)
al101uk
18/5/2018
10:02
I think they should change their names back to Kennedy Ventures - I liked the share price much better when they were called that!!!!
bobby1904
18/5/2018
09:58
:) Trouble is, al, sometimes waiting for absolute clarity we miss the boat.
paleje
18/5/2018
09:31
ridicule, I avoided the word placing because I don't know if one will be required or not... they need additional capital, that may come from any number of sources, ramping up the current customers supply being the one I would be hoping for. The problem is that the lack of clarity makes it difficult to come to any firm conclusions. Unfortunately having a holding in Amerisur, being an ex-holder of Ironveld and following along here and on SMA, I tend to write that last sentence often.
al101uk
18/5/2018
09:04
al101uk You make some good points. My take is that the early management at the mine were not up to it. GC and the BoD eventually cottoned on to this. I attended the AGM in Cardiff a few years ago and it was clear then. I sold all my shares following that but with a good profit. One point that came out of that was that the Tantalum they mine has low radioactivity and there were other sites in Africa where the radioactivity was such that it infringed the shipping rules. They were intending to blend this with their tantalum to get the overall radioactivity level to be compliant with the shipping rules. Nothing was ever announced via RNS and I suspect the original offtake partner rejected the process. The one good point that remains is that Kazeira tantalum does have low radioactivity! I am not worried about the change of position on the manning front. I think that the other potential partners want reassurance that there is sufficient resource for a multi-year deal as you posit in your second post. The way to do this is to divert investment from manning to drilling. Even GC will not be attracted to equity raise at the current share price. I agree with your upside points, but I do not feel an equity raise is inevitable. Given the potential further uptake partners are happy with the quality of the tantalum now being produced and the quality of the management as stated in the RNS before this latest one, one of them, or more, could come in as a stakeholder, particularly if the extra resource discovered is excessive. There are clearly risks with investing here, but at 2.5-2.65p under 300m shares currently in issue and with the world wide demand for Tantalum high, I still think this is a potentially very good investment at these levels, albeit there are risks. No risk, no reward!! I have a sympathy with Chrtsalis99, but John Wardle recently taking a further significant stake tipped me into to doing the same.
ridicule
18/5/2018
09:04
Sadly par for the course with GC companies, Chrysalis. I think the truth is they've winged it, thought they would get more more offtakers come on board and geared up for that...but it hasn't happened. The offtakers may well be there and interested but want more evidence of ability to meet their requirements long term. So this diversion is being forced on them, they would have done it at some point anyway but *after* establishing a revenue stream. So now they've got to do it *before* they get the revenue stream. So cut some overheads and get on with it. Look at how GC's other enterprises bumble along, they show similar traits, all have massive swings in sentiment and share price volatity, witness the recent drops and vitriol on AMER but look how the share price is starting to perform. People were saying Wardle was an idiot for buying at the price he did, but he wasn't an idiot at AMER and nor was he here imo.
paleje
18/5/2018
07:46
I just don't trust the management team any more. There's been too much disinformation and fake news, bluff and bluster. The shareholders are being treated with disdain.
chrysalis99
17/5/2018
23:25
The other alternative, I guess, is that the second off take partner wants a longer bigger contract than the company can currently provide and wants to see proof of their ability to continue supply. Just throwing up potential narratives.
al101uk
17/5/2018
13:52
Chrysalis99 I do not know how long you have been tracking Kazera, but I have been invested since the early Kennedy venture days. GC invested with out a full understanding of the quality required of mined and processed tantalum. Larry was brought in as an expert and quite frankly the mine was a busted flush when he arrived. The offtake partner at the time rejected the quality of the tantalum. The shares reached 11p and I got out with a good profit before they drifted back to the present level. My confidence has grown as Larry has brought in improvement after improvement and achieved approval for the vital orange river license. This is exactly the type of situation Warren Buffet would have invested in. A company with sound natural assets that had lost its way, but have now put matters right I agree with paleje. A £7m market cap is way too low. It looks like the reserves will be given a major upgrade and, while lithium wasn’t mentioned in today’s announcement, there is a good possibility that significant quantities may well be found. I cannot understand your point that it is a negative for them to reduce numbers. I make the point that they can meet the current demand for offtake with those reduced numbers and they are diverting the money to proving up a greater resource. Surely this is a much better option than issuing more shares. The fact that there are only 257 million shares in issue is another positive. I am surprised that there has not been any buying today. I am fairly well loaded up with one million. But may well add more over the coming weeks.
ridicule
17/5/2018
10:00
So they've spent all that time and money optimising the plant for production but now they're going to see what resources they have instead of finally ramping production and generating some returns. You couldn't make it up.If you're suggesting Buffet would invest in this because it's "cheap" then you don't have a good enough understanding of his investment philosophy.
chrysalis99
Chat Pages: 5  4  3  2  1
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:40 V: D:20180527 21:44:41