We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jadestone Energy Plc | LSE:JSE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BLR71299 | ORD GBP0.001 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.25 | 1.00% | 25.25 | 25.00 | 25.50 | 25.25 | 25.25 | 25.25 | 906,433 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 323.28M | -91.27M | -0.1688 | -1.50 | 135.2M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
25/9/2024 12:48 | Haha, thanks - 'fame' at last :) Have had a response from IR on the Montara cost question - will post later this eve. | king suarez | |
24/9/2024 11:01 | MT - thanks. Agreed, it is a shocking increase in Opex without any transparency to explain so far. Let's see what the response to the question comes back with. | king suarez | |
24/9/2024 10:41 | Ks - ref: Hurricane Energy - Aoka Mizu FPSO The day rate quoted is for a bareboat charter - where Hurricane assumes responsibility for the management, operation & control of the ship for the period of the charter. Bluewater, the owner is responsible for asset depreciation and capital cost amortisation (payment of capital and interest), and the owner usually bears the Class Survey costs of the ship. Montara Venture is owned by Jadestone and was included in the net circa $82m completion price of the Montara asset. Considering the huge recent uplift in operating cost of the Montara asset and its materially negative impact on the length of the remaining commercial life, it should be entirely reasonable for shareholders to request a cost breakdown/explanatio | mount teide | |
24/9/2024 06:58 | Thanks for that nigel + KS, much appreciated. | birotop | |
24/9/2024 06:55 | I had the same email from Phil Corbett - he also added: "Please could I also ask that someone asks Pogue to get in touch directly (he has my contact details) if he wishes to discuss any aspect of the EPCI contract further." In a separate email I have also had MTs question about Montara costs acknowledged: "Please give me a bit of time to pull together some figures and analysis – in particular, I just want to ensure there is a like-for-like comparison with the Hurricane figures you refer to below." | king suarez | |
24/9/2024 06:49 | I reached out to IR regarding the recent posts and speculation - they provided a statement for issuing - I post verbatim: The key components and units of the Akatara gas processing facility were sourced globally. Countries of origin include, but are not limited to, the USA, Canada, Germany, Italy, China, Japan and Korea. Only one of the project’s 34 main packages comes solely from China and none of the key units at the Akatara Gas Processing Facility were skid mounted in China. The factory acceptance testing (FAT) for the key components and units took place in several locations, including the countries of origin listed above as well as in Singapore and Indonesia (for certain equipment) once the equipment and units arrived in region. While the individual components of the refrigeration compressor (including its motor) were subject to an FAT before being delivered to site, it is not the industry standard to FAT the entire unit before it arrives on site, particularly if the individual components are being sourced from different countries/manufactur The EPCI contractor, JGC, is a reputable and financially strong contractor, which has successfully completed many projects in Indonesia, including gas processing plants. JGC was not solely selected on the basis of the bid price, but also its capability and reputation. JGC has Japanese leadership at site and also in Jakarta and is bringing its global expertise to bear on the project. JGC remains responsible (both in terms of activity and cost) for delivering a fully commissioned and functioning gas processing facility at Akatara and is fully committed to doing so. As stated at the results last week, we have reached c.20mmscfd of raw gas input into the plant and c.14mmscfd of sales gas. Condensate production and sales have also commenced. The issues we have experienced with the export compressor and refrigeration compressor are teething issues and are normal for a plant of this scale and nature. The refrigeration compressor motor repairs are ongoing, and we remain confident this issue will be resolved shortly. | nigelpm | |
23/9/2024 17:59 | Thanks for sharing KS & Pogue, appreciated. | upwego | |
21/9/2024 11:13 | KS -'Hope you don't mind?' Not at all. 'I rephrased it slightly saying the cost increase was 'surprising' rather than 'outrageous' ' lol - Very good - much more tactful! Have become far more direct and less diplomatic over the last few decades - my industry friends likewise, we think it's an age thing! IR - Phil has always responded promptly and in detail to my previous emails - even when asked some very direct questions. | mount teide | |
21/9/2024 10:50 | Hi MT, Paul did say 'please contact us if you have questions, we are very amenable to it' so I have emailed IR with your question - I rephrased it slightly saying the cost increase was 'surprising' rather than 'outrageous' lol. I did mention to Paul that this increase in costs for both Montara and Stag had shocked investors and thought it was part of the reason people are reluctant to buy shares at the moment. Let's see if they provide any answer. Hope you don't mind? KS | king suarez | |
21/9/2024 10:34 | Ref: Montara Venture The question I would like answered by Paul Blakeley is how the Montara Field OPEX can go from circa $20/bbl for annual production in 2021 of 7,647 bopd, pre the Montara Venture Class issues, to circa $60/bbl for production of circa 6,000 bopd in 2024? An OPEX increase of $75m a year, from $56m to $131m is outrageous when considering the following: Hurricane Energy has the 'Akoa Mizu' FPSO on long term charter at its Lancaster, West of Shetland Field. The FPSO has a cargo capacity around 725,000 bbls, slightly smaller than Montara Venture when all the cargo tanks are available(This has not been the case since Jadestone bought the Montara asset). Hurricane currently pays the FPSO owner Bluewater, $75k/day for the FPSO - $27.9m a year. AIMHO/DYOR | mount teide | |
20/9/2024 14:28 | To be honest I have probably got my wires crossed - it was 3 something :) | king suarez | |
20/9/2024 14:23 | According to website the secondary contract at Akatara is for 3BCF (~500kboe) and under negotiation for a small premium to other contract. KS mentioned 3mmscf- I presume that would be the daily amount for ~1000 days? | croasdalelfc | |
20/9/2024 14:14 | MT last time I did inspections for BP their specs clearly stated no St St from China or India and all Super Duplex must be NORSOK approved vendor. They had too many failures of those materials in the past from those countries. I myself have seen certificates for the metals that were clearly forged and the results of those metals failing. | pogue | |
20/9/2024 12:37 | inspections .... strange.... producer has its own... several of them, then an outside inspection entity does the job again and signs and is responsible. at the end the buyer sent an old man to check it again without papers as he wished - and that was decisive speaking of turbines and ship motors in my younger times abb, andritz, fincantieri etc there was not a remote chance of something braking. quality assurance systems not allowing it.... too expensive | kaos3 | |
20/9/2024 12:33 | thank you both from here too. i assume they have the cultural problem. eg thinking they are brilliant at squeezing the last drop and that is the essential of their business performance but when they imply that to the assets/equipment - no good one has to be able to spend as a king where needed and being cheap warren buffet style at the same time very difficult to be both in the same entity.... | kaos3 | |
20/9/2024 11:24 | My experience of Chinese built ships is that they're as reliable as market leader Japanese built ships, provided the inspection and maintenance protocols are followed without exception. After leaving the shipyard, all newbuildings spend 1-2 weeks doing engine/speed/manouev | mount teide | |
20/9/2024 10:17 | Did they ever fix that ship m8? I've got some pritt stick and blue tack in the kitchen draw if you want me to post it fella! | bukowski750 | |
20/9/2024 10:13 | Pogue - thanks. Malaysian FPSO - If BP is the next charterer, then that's very encouraging as BP will only charter oil tankers and FPSO's that are maintained and operated to the highest standards. | mount teide | |
20/9/2024 10:01 | Heads up - B750 along with his numerous other handles is an obnoxious troll that most have on filter, particularly on the Asia Met Resources thread where he is the resident shill for a management that has presided over the loss of more than 95% of the company's value, since telling the market in 2019 they were now going to use their decades of sector 'experience' to 'monetise' the assets. Valuations of $1 - $2 a share were mentioned. After blowing through circa $80m of shareholders funds since 2015, the shares today sit at $0.006p/$23m market cap. B750 is a highly narcissistic, Walter Mitty type character with a hugely overinflated opinion of his stock picking ability - laughable, when the researchable reality is that his equity investment track record makes a casino roulette wheel look attractive. | mount teide | |
20/9/2024 09:51 | Oh thanks m8, I only read the top half of MT's posts to be fair, I just saw SFA clusters! | bukowski750 | |
20/9/2024 09:38 | No, it stands for Small Field Asset Production Sharing Contract 'roflmao'. | king suarez | |
20/9/2024 09:37 | MT The FPSO has indeed been identified and they had to remove a picture of it from the presentation as the sale and leaseback company did not want people to know what vessel it was and that they had a future interest in it. IIRC it is in for maintenance just now then will be a year in the Middle East with BP (I think that's the client) before JSE get it. | pogue | |
20/9/2024 09:20 | Many thanks KS and Pogue for attending the presentation and providing us with some very useful feedback of your discussions. With regard to development of the existing assets and future M&A activity, I believe Malaysia now holds the greatest low cost growth potential - so, it was highly encouraging to hear Jadestone has identified an FPSO to facilitate development of what has the potential to become the biggest jewel in Jadestone's asset register - the SFA Cluster. In this connection, I'm sure most shareholders will be pleased to hear a chastened management has learnt from their and our appalling and hugely expensive experience of owning and operating Montara Venture, ie; that FPSO Class Inspection, Planned Maintenance and Remediation work is best outsourced to shipping companies that specialise in owning and operating these highly sophisticated ships, which carry the additional responsibility of carrying out in-water surveys for up to 25 years IN LIEU of the mandatory two dry dockings every 5 years required for ALL other types of commercial shipping. SFA Cluster PSC 'In July 2024, through the Malaysia Bid Round Plus, Jadestone was awarded a 100% participating interest in a Small Field Asset Production Sharing Contract (the “SFA Cluster PSC”) offshore Peninsular Malaysia by Petroliam Nasional Berhad (“PETRONASR The SFA Cluster PSC is located in shallow waters offshore Peninsular Malaysia. It is surrounded by the PM428 PSC, in which a 60% operated interest was awarded to Jadestone earlier in 2024 through the MBR 2023. The SFA Cluster PSC includes the Penara, Puteri, Padang and North Lukut fields, assets in which Jadestone previously held a 50% non-operated interest (through the PM318 PSC and the Abu, Abu Kecil, Bubu, North Lukut and Penara PSC) following the Company’s entry into Malaysia in August 2021. The SFA Cluster PSC fields were producing at a gross rate of 5,000 boe/d in early 2022 prior to production shut-in. Jadestone currently estimates that the SFA Cluster PSC contains c.15 mmbbls of gross 2C contingent resources. Leveraging the experience gained through the very successful 2023 infill drilling campaign on the PM323 licence, Jadestone believes there is the potential for significant upside from future infill drilling across the existing SFA Cluster fields as well as prospects and leads on the surrounding PM428 PSC. The Company intends to continue its technical assessment of the SFA Cluster prior to submission of a field development and abandonment plan to PETRONAS. PM428 PSC As part of the Malaysia Bid Round 2023, Jadestone was awarded the PM428 PSC as operator with a 60% interest, with the joint venture partner being Petronas Carigali. The PM428 PSC represents potential upside in the event that Jadestone is successful in its application for the Puteri Cluster (see left), since it not only surrounds the Puteri Cluster, but is also in close proximity to the Jadestone operated PM323 and PM329 PSCs. The PM428 award carries a minimal financial commitment to reprocess some existing seismic. ' | mount teide |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions