ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

JSE Jadestone Energy Plc

32.00
0.90 (2.89%)
03 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Jadestone Energy Plc LSE:JSE London Ordinary Share GB00BLR71299 ORD GBP0.001
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.90 2.89% 32.00 31.50 32.50 32.00 30.75 31.25 1,927,536 16:11:46
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 323.28M -91.27M -0.1688 -1.90 173.06M
Jadestone Energy Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker JSE. The last closing price for Jadestone Energy was 31.10p. Over the last year, Jadestone Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 21.50p to 39.50p.

Jadestone Energy currently has 540,817,144 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Jadestone Energy is £173.06 million. Jadestone Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.90.

Jadestone Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 21426 to 21447 of 22075 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  859  858  857  856  855  854  853  852  851  850  849  848  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
25/4/2024
11:16
Hi oilinvestorAL

Thankyou for the reply and information, great post.

Great operational information. If you dont mind I have a few other questions.

Do companies get any say in the abandonment fund estimates?

Are all abandonment funds funded so quickly and locked away for decades?

When the time comes is the abandonment process controlled and contractors chosen by the regulators or do companies get access to the fund and it becomes their very closely monitored project?

Are companies getting interest / returns on these funds?

If the fund estimates dont match reality when the time arrives, can they find themselves with a large pot of money? or who would be at fault if the fund was not enough if the fund levels are set by the regulators?


JSE have not gone through this process fully yet so will be interesting to see how it goes, if they are still so happy and eager to spend the coffers as they are to fill them (with large chunks of their operational cash / RBL). If they are still a thing ofcourse.

1ajm
25/4/2024
10:40
The share price here seem to nearly, if not always drop on a half year or full year results day, even back in the day when the figures seem decent. I think people would expect a good year to reveal massive profits but it doesn't work like that for a small aim oiler.

Ofcourse the price is so far in the garbage nowadays maybe it will be different this time. There use to be a real hype in the share price leading up to these things.

2024 so far and forward looking statment along with RBL news and akatara update are the best chance at a blue day,.


Ashkv etc...can tell you otherwise or muddy information simply by the fact I said it, like that changes anything. he's still waiting for his 'incoming' 100p chinese takeover bid. His beloved forcasters 100p predictions turned out to be 27p, now they guess under 60p he must be expecting under 20p, unfortunate.

1ajm
24/4/2024
08:49
If we get confirmation that they produced close to 20kbopd in q1 2024 and akatara will be up and runing by end of q2 then this should rerate.
neo26
24/4/2024
08:06
There's still three full trading days pughman.
nigelpm
24/4/2024
08:03
It gonna come soon.
neo26
24/4/2024
07:23
I was expecting a pre results RBL RNS, to try and engender a positive vibe going into Monday, but looks like it ain't going to happen.
pughman
23/4/2024
08:33
Dated 18th april 2024 short clip at akatara, not sure when it was filmed though
sea7
20/4/2024
23:05
Thanks MT, personally over the long run I would like an equal split between oil and gas like Serica but do understand the faster growth of oil alone including from an attractiveness for an investor perspective. With the cost of lending so high I would agree a partner would be best. JSE could do anything this year and I remain optimistic especially as the traditional holders like Baillie Gifford are out the net buying can now begin.
mrscruff
20/4/2024
17:44
Hi 1AJM The biggest abandonment cost is by far the wells , followed by the subsea infrastructure and lastly the FPSO. A few different factors would play a role in the exact split. The main one being the complexity of the wells & the subsea infrastructure. There are certain shallow water subsea wells that you abandon in a few weeks/ well. Deep water wells take a lot longer as it can take 3-6 days just to run & retrieve the BOP (without accounting for subsurface work). The local regulations in Australia will also play a role. Some regulators in certain jurisdictions will allow you some leeway when it comes to the final abandonment design & execution (others want everything done exactly as per the book)! This adds additional time to the well abandonment. CWLH are shallow water fields located in 75-135 water depth. They should be able to abandon those using a jackup rig (which is at the very cheap end of MODUs) rather than a semi-sub. The costs will be closer to $150,000 -$200,000 a day (for the rig) rather than $500,000+. Although, the rig market is pretty tight in Australia and comes with pretty horrendous mobilisation costs. That's just the rig rate. On top of that you'll have key well abandoned services ( well intervention, fishing, cementing, TRS/ tubular recovery & wellheads etc etc.) Without seeing the complexity of the well designs (& how far the wells are from each other which dictates how far the rig needs to be moved each time), I wouldn't be able put a cost on a typical well abandonment.The costs quoted by Jadestone are pretty reasonable IMHO. These are small shallow water fields with just over a dozen wells so I don't believe JSE are taking on much risk with these. I think there is probably a decent amount of contingencies baked into those figures. I would personally expect it to come in less than that. For context: The large North Sea field abandonments are costing multi-billions rather than hundreds of millions.
oilinvestoral
20/4/2024
16:06
MrS - No.....since I would rather they either found a partner to share the high upfront $150m-$200m development cost excluding the FPSO(circa $150m) and execution risk.......or use the cash to continue buying attractively priced, high quality, second phase O&G assets with materiel reinvestment potential in SE Asia.
mount teide
20/4/2024
15:51
To be fair technology used generally deflationary and the technology in the O&G sector I believe has got better. I would think cost inflation in the sector has peeked and these costs should be added to the oil price over time as there is always a lag for this to feed through in other sectors like infrastuture (unlike retail). It takes a while for inflation to feed through.

Has anyone done the maths on the revenue and estimated profits of the Vietnam gas?

mrscruff
20/4/2024
11:19
Chart many have been waiting for Bloomberg to publish for years - Oil Price Adjusted for inflation from 1970 - 2024.

Confirming that the oil price today in real terms would have to nearly double to reach the level it averaged for 4 years between 2011 and 2014, and would have to go up by 122% to reach its all time inflation adjusted 2008 high price.

mount teide
19/4/2024
11:21
AL while you're here. Thanks for the posts.

What would the costs roughly breakdown to on the CWLH abandonment costs. $102m per 16.66% roughly $650m.

Okha FPSO isnt much of an issue.

how long does the well head sealing / subsea structure take;

If costs were $500k a day it would be a 1,200 day operation after dealing with the FPSO?

What would a breakdown look like?

do they get three new Akatara processing plants with it? haha just kidding.

1ajm
18/4/2024
16:23
I think they should have the hand off whoever is offering 15-20m.
fardels bear
18/4/2024
15:39
Great series of posts by Al.
nigelpm
18/4/2024
15:28
21414, preferably with a micky mouse image atop!
fireplace22
18/4/2024
15:24
No worries! It's expensive business and a lot of AIM punters don't really understand the game they're playing when it comes to understand the liabilities associated with decommissioning obligations. For what it's worth I'm fairly happy with Jadestone and don't believe they have overdone it or overstretched themselves. There are many other companies that have bitten off far more than they can chew....
oilinvestoral
18/4/2024
15:22
I can't help but wonder if those newfangled plastic wine stoppers to replace cork that the french hate so much could be used at scale here.;)
premium beeks
18/4/2024
15:19
Thanks again Al, curiosity now satisfied.
fireplace22
18/4/2024
15:02
can't grasp why the decomm of well heads is so much more difficult/expensive than say sealing an exploration well with non commercial flow?----------------Yep it's a completely different ball game! A sub commercial exploration well is tested using something called a DST string (which is essentially simple temporary pipework with minimal attachment to the actual well). It can be unset and recovered by rotation or a simple upward pull. I've seen explo rigs button up an explo well within 7-10 days. A production well on the other hand is fixed using a permanent production packer. The tubing may have to be cut and the packer sometimes has to be milled. There are numerous hydraulic , electrical and occasionally fibre optic lines to contend with. All that before you even get to setting your first cement plug and begin to think about cutting/ milling casing strings etc etc etc etc etc ....
oilinvestoral
18/4/2024
14:50
Cheers for that Al, well explained, but can't grasp why the decomm of well heads is so much more difficult/expensive than say sealing an exploration well with non commercial flow? Just a thought.
fireplace22
18/4/2024
13:18
How decomm numbers are reached and how any get to $1b for any FPSO is a complete mystery to me. I'm leaning towards there being a disgusting goverment 'enviromental' tax in there somewhere.

Are decomm fees considerably worse or better depending on region or lifetime output of the asset? no idea

Atleast woodside kept that problem to themselves and JSE didnt buy it.

1ajm
Chat Pages: Latest  859  858  857  856  855  854  853  852  851  850  849  848  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock