ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

JSE Jadestone Energy Plc

25.25
0.25 (1.00%)
Last Updated: 08:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Jadestone Energy Plc LSE:JSE London Ordinary Share GB00BLR71299 ORD GBP0.001
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.25 1.00% 25.25 25.00 25.50 25.25 25.25 25.25 118,433 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 323.28M -91.27M -0.1688 -1.50 135.2M
Jadestone Energy Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker JSE. The last closing price for Jadestone Energy was 25p. Over the last year, Jadestone Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 23.00p to 39.00p.

Jadestone Energy currently has 540,817,144 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Jadestone Energy is £135.20 million. Jadestone Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.50.

Jadestone Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 21376 to 21399 of 22950 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  858  857  856  855  854  853  852  851  850  849  848  847  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
15/4/2024
10:11
That would be good. Keep this focused on Jadestone.
nigelpm
15/4/2024
10:01
Take the politics elsewhere eh?
premium beeks
15/4/2024
10:00
Iran is not a pariah state, israelnis the pariah state.
neo26
15/4/2024
07:20
Nice start to the week
premium beeks
14/4/2024
16:02
Yes, agree with all that. There is a lot of pressure on Netanyahu coming from all left wing sources to agree a ceasefire and get the hostages home - The Times of Israel is extremely anti Netanyahu. But as you say, there are probably very few left alive and the cost of any deal would be far too high. It’s clear Hamas’ leadership in Qatar etc are fearful of being assassinated and are losing the war.
tim000
14/4/2024
15:54
By all accounts Iran is a pariah amongst most Arab countries and the attack by Hamas was to prevent further detente with the likes of Saudi Arabia - after Israel went into to Gaza, the Saudis could hardly be seen to identify with Israel. Noticeable that Jordanian forces downed Irani missiles last night.
A ceasefire is probably impossible as it would require the release of hostages, most of whom are unfortunately probably now dead.

fireplace22
14/4/2024
15:34
Israel made the decision to attack Iran early Sunday morning, but that plan was canceled after a phone call between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Joe Biden, The New York Times reported, citing US officials.

The officials noted that Biden told Israel that its defense against the barrage of Iranian drones and missiles was "a major strategic victory" and that Israeli retaliation wasn't needed, The New York Times reported.

This is a developing story.

fireplace22
14/4/2024
15:13
I’ve increased my JSE holding by a third this week, looks far too cheap given the impending growth of production.
tim000
14/4/2024
15:12
MT, what’s new I think is the joining of forces between Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, who despise western values; the predominant use of the dollar in commodities markets in which they trade; and the use of NATO to thwart their imperialist expansion plans. As you say, this has happened exactly because they see enfeebled leadership throughout the west - with more money being spent on woke agendas than on defence. As authoritarian dictatorships, they can play the long game - as Putin is doing in Ukraine, slowly grinding down the west’s will to engage in warfare. China is no doubt looking at pursuing a similar strategy wrt Taiwan. I don’t see this power struggle easing anytime soon, suggesting an oil premium will continue perhaps indefinitely.
tim000
14/4/2024
14:24
To the Iranian's and their proxies Biden's one word "don't" proved about as effective as Obama's "red line in the sand" in Syria, which they immediately stepped over and laughed in his face. Likewise, within a few days of Biden lecturing the Iranians, their leadership launch 300 drones and missiles at Israel.

Whatever the left may think of Trump he managed to keep the Iranians, Russians, Chinese and North Koreans from launching wars during his 4 years in the White House.

Heightened political tension and conflict in the Middle East has historically led to oil market traders building in a price premium, until cooler heads prevail.

mount teide
14/4/2024
14:17
No, Bidens (and Obama's) attitude to Iran has emboldened and bankrolled them by unfreezing funds to put them in a position able cause this mayhem and worse with their nuclear ambitions. The mans a disaster yet we'll probably still get 4 more years of him or his ilk.
fireplace22
14/4/2024
13:41
Israel certainly dont
tom111
14/4/2024
11:44
oooh don't know about tom, that might upset Joe too much, but then again he told the Iranians 'not to' and they did so it seems no one is listening to him anymore.
fireplace22
14/4/2024
11:10
As they were saying on American News this is the excuse Israel want to cut off the snakes head,whether they do it is a different matter
tom111
14/4/2024
10:59
It looks the heat has come out already. Amazing defence by Israel, US, UK and others. Clearly Israel won't just sit there and take it though so volatility a certainty.
nigelpm
14/4/2024
10:09
$2 jump with a drift lower .... parity by end of the night
croasdalelfc
14/4/2024
06:41
With iran attacking Israel overnight with 300 dromes and missiles wonder how the oil market will respond tomorrow
tom111
13/4/2024
18:55
Update to an earlier post:

Montara - JSE got the opex/bbl at Montara down to circa $20 at 9,000 bopd within 12-18 months of taking over the asset - from $50-60/bbl at circa $6-7,000 bopd prior to compilation of the deal.

The management need to explain how at a guided average production of 5,500 bopd for 2024, Montara's opex/bbl is back up to $60.

When Montara's Opex/bbl was $20 from production averaging circa 9,000 bopd, the operating costs were circa $65m/year. In 2024, Montara'a operating costs are being guided at $120m for average production of 5,500 bopd.

$55m a year increase (of which $14m is for charter of the shuttle tanker) - the additional $41m would have comfortably covered the cost of the work required by Nopsema on the Montara Venture being carried out in a SE Asian Shipyard, in a scenario where the field would probably have been off production for a maximum of 6 months. When the FSPO at the Afentra 3/05 Angola field went to a SE Asian yard to undertake a Special Survey and a major 4-5 month life extension work programme, at its peak there were over 2,000 low cost yard operatives at work on the FPSO.

In comparison, by carrying out the inspection, remedial and repair work on Montara Venture in-situ, the onboard accommodation facilities will have limited Jadestone to a maximum of perhaps 40-50 highly salaried Australian ship maintenance contractors. Resulting in the protracted remediation of the issues affecting Montara Venture since June 2022.....and the fire fighting of the financial issues that subsequently arose from the loss of such a large amount of high value production/cash flow over such a long period of time.

It was Paul Blakeley who said in 2020 that after reducing Montara's opex/bbl to $20, that the asset would be Jadestone's 'Cash Cow' for the coming decade - however, the poor management of the regulatory inspection and maintenance of Montara Venture Jadestone inherited and in some respects continued, particularly during the pandemic, destroyed the credibility of that reasonable claim at the time.

In 2025, Montara's operating costs are guided to drop by $25m (the annual cost of the charter of the shuttle tanker would account for circa $17.5m of this) to $95m. Suggesting, that at an average production of say 5,000 to 5,500 bopd, the opex/bbl would be circa $50.....a figure I think has the potential to prove conservative, considering the huge cost of the work being carried out in-situ this year falling away in 2025.

Stag - Operating costs guided at $70m for 2024. For an average of 2,500 bopd, this would suggest a capex/bbl of $77, dropping to $66/bbl in 2025 at the guided $60m annual operating cost and same production.

The additional cost of the shuttle tanker in permanent attendance over having an FPSO over the field was $16m in 2024 - this arrangement has had the effect of lifting annual opex by $17.5 bbl. In 2024/5 an average oil sales price of $100/bbl inclusive of a $15 low sulphur premium would generate sufficient cash flow to drill 2 further infill wells to raise production to 4,000 bopd in 2025....where a $65m annual operating cost would see the potential for the Opex drop to $44.5/bbl.


AIMHO/DYOR

mount teide
13/4/2024
16:18
Yes Montara and Stag are being diluted ever increasingly so.Some people are just not up to speed lol
tom111
13/4/2024
12:38
Ankatara coming on shortly - big increase in production and revenue.

Very pivotal moment for the business and share price
Monday could be the last chance buying under 30p

upwego
13/4/2024
11:51
"Was"being the operative word pughman.Quote "huge sales at 26p" but we are now 29.50p
tom111
13/4/2024
11:35
The share price increase is down to the $9 rise in the oil price since suspension, a sector rally and relief at the Woodside deal not going through.As to operational and financial progress, that remains to be seen. What is beyond doubt are the costs of producing oil from Montara and Stag in 24 at $60 and $75 are obscene. That is Blakeley's bread and butter, and an embarrassment.
pughman
13/4/2024
10:44
Shareprice up 23%(and a peak of 29%) in 1.5 days post resumption of trading on a very strong 12 million transaction volume, the highest in nearly a year, suggests the market likes the operational and financial progress being made in 2024 and value on offer, and like many here, that Woodside has elected to cancel the divestment of the participating interests in their Macedon and Pyrenees assets.

Woodside stated that it “remains disciplined and value-driven when considering any potential merger and acquisition transaction, including divestments”. Suggesting the cancellation of this latest proposed divestment should not have been too surprising to the market, since in February, a planned mega merger of Australia's two largest independent energy companies, Woodside and Santos, also fell through after the companies failed to agree on a price.

mount teide
12/4/2024
15:20
oil and gas on the move good for companies like JSE
stockhunters
Chat Pages: Latest  858  857  856  855  854  853  852  851  850  849  848  847  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock