ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

IMM Immupharma Plc

2.14
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Immupharma Plc LSE:IMM London Ordinary Share GB0033711010 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 2.14 2.10 2.18 2.20 2.19 2.19 604,698 16:35:15
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Finance Services 0 -3.81M -0.0114 -1.93 7.33M
Immupharma Plc is listed in the Finance Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IMM. The last closing price for Immupharma was 2.14p. Over the last year, Immupharma shares have traded in a share price range of 0.83p to 3.78p.

Immupharma currently has 333,403,115 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Immupharma is £7.33 million. Immupharma has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.93.

Immupharma Share Discussion Threads

Showing 14801 to 14819 of 39125 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  593  592  591  590  589  588  587  586  585  584  583  582  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/2/2018
07:37
Only my second post to board.Flávio I Echo your sentiments. I have a large holding relative to my portfolio. Only aim stock I hold. I accept the risk in investing in this stock and I hold to many to justify adding further equally I am to scared to miss out on the potential to sell any pre phase 3 results. After 12 years in the stock one more month should pass quite quickly. My thoughts were a successful outcome for lupuzor would be the point at which I cash in. Not sure now though. I hope for a lupuzor licensing deal and the opportunity for the company to bring the pipeline forward. It potentially has more to offer than lupuzor alone. May take another 10 years but I think this is what Dr Zimmer will want. And he has a big say in what the company does.
teapottoby
21/2/2018
07:36
Starts Feb, ends Oct, enrols 100 patients minimum but all Phase 3 patients are eligible. Not all start dosing at the same time.
stealth wealth
21/2/2018
07:35
Hamhamham1

Please can i have your comments on this????

"You have not commented about the risk profile I posted about being comfortable about the risk compared to one's wealth rather than a percentage of one's portfolio". This is important and I would like your views????

Its the professional way in investing...

flavio_monteiro
21/2/2018
07:32
Didn’t the clinical trials website say the extension study had not started yet? Said it was this month? So did the people who completed dosing on ph3 say 6 months sgo had no lupuzor since. Also the number of patients on the extension still estimates 100 - i cant find that clinical trials link.
growthinvestor2001
21/2/2018
07:27
Phase 3 patients and clinicians asked for dosing to continue after the end of the trial, presumably because they experienced or witnessed benefit and an absence of side effects.
stealth wealth
21/2/2018
07:15
The probability is that Phase 3 results will be better than the already excellent Phase 2b, as patients will have been dosed for longer so allowing the drug longer to act.
stealth wealth
21/2/2018
07:14
Hamhamham1

YOUR QUOTE
"Yet then yourself and others encourage investors here to keep buying, they're cheap, chance in a lifetime, not gonna fail, etc"

Justify this comment please?

Can you find ONE ramp or share price prediction that I have posted?

I have often quoted PE values to earning - No one on this board seems to understand them!

Its nothing impressive the circles I move in. We all have friend that have done well.

You have not commented about the risk profile I posted about being comfortable about the risk compared to one's wealth rather than a percentage of one portfolio. This is important and I would like your views????

I DO agree with YOU on overextending oneself in one share....

flavio_monteiro
21/2/2018
07:02
Fwiw rossy - I don't think ham is working for anyone, he's just a bit of a plonker. I have him on ignore, along with many other bulls/bears who repeat the same things. I think I'm ignoring about a dozen - far more than I have done before. Not sure if covert things are going on, but it is certainly a strange board. GLA
wigwammer
20/2/2018
23:18
Any chance of a "sensible"day to-morrow?
Instead of churning out the same old recycled posts again and again why don't we restrict things to any new research or FRESH schools of thought?

What on earth would an alien think if they were to stumble upon this forum and read the posts from the last few days?

Methinks that we all need to get our act together and act like responsible investors!

Just go away and find something useful to do for however long.it may.be before
we get the trial results as absolutely nothing anyone says on here,no matter how many times they repeat it,will change a thing! SLEEP ON THIS THOUGHT.!

teddy boy1
20/2/2018
22:01
I don't know how cheap derampers want to buy.Just jump in!Cause is a chance in life!Big possibilities to be good so yr money will be multiplied by x5,6,7 or 10 times!Clearly it will go over placing price after 28!The market sentiment will drive it.None of us experts in pharma.we all want money!
costax1654x
20/2/2018
21:45
BSF, you seem to be quite confrontational for someone who purports to be a ‘Marketing manager’ for a very successful consultancy firm, you give the impression that you would frighten away any prospective clients, especially after you spent your time regaling them on all the negatives of your very successful firm just so they didn’t make the wrong decision. You also seem to try and mould what has been said to suit your agenda, which seems to be on the negative side of the fence, from what I have read on this board there are a few ‘holders’; who are so glum about IMM and any positive information that’s in the public domain that I have to question why bother holding any shares in a company you do not have a positive view in, bizarre, but takes all sorts I guess. I did try to put my view in simplistic terms to avoid any confusion so let me try one more time, I do not expect Tim to release any market sensitive positive/negative news on Monday evening, but I would find it odd if he did not reiterate the positives about IMM and their pipeline at a investors evening, probably to placate investors after the placing. If all you had was negative or neutral sentiment to pass on then my question was why would anyone, let alone Tim, bother with it. Hope that’s basic enough for you to understand. As for the Wolf of Wall Street, hardly think anyone on these boards are in the same league for misleading people as he was, but you never know there are some disingenuous souls about. GLA holders.
harbourside
20/2/2018
21:03
growthinvestor & ytsa2 - you are both clearly mental...only kidding...

I agree completely with your l-o-g-i-c...

Obviously some here are from the Jordan Belfort school of selling...

thebigshortfella
20/2/2018
20:56
I spoke to James Pope on 24th Jan. on the day of the placing to try and find out more about reasons etc.SP on that day was i think slightly higher than 144p. On that day he said they were hoping to have an investors evening with Imm. So that was before it fell to recent lows. Thus not convinced related to recent negative sentiment
ytsa2
20/2/2018
20:54
the presentation evening is there to placate and reassure the peeps that invested at 144p a share who are now thinking they could have got in lower or that they think something may be wrong. The irony is that it was the placing that has caused the share drop and really there is no news to justify the drop. I think it will be neutral and a non event just reiterating the sales pitch they were given before the placing ‘request’;. I don’t see why IMM would try and talk up their share price this close to ph3 results - would it really make any difference on the day?
growthinvestor2001
20/2/2018
20:48
metis20 - yeah right...sorry to not join in with the illogical rampers...
thebigshortfella
20/2/2018
20:45
Harbourside - Keep up the good,logical work -tbsf's thinking is muddled at best.
metis20
20/2/2018
20:41
LOL I am the Marketing Manager for a very successful consultancy and therefore have a clear understanding of what "value" is. Not sure that you do though. Please think about what you are writing. If IMM had positive material news they would have to announce it now..not set up a meeting in 7 days time...

Has the share price collapsed? No...So why do you think IMM need to put their side of the story? What you are saying doesn't make any sense...All in my opinion of course....

thebigshortfella
20/2/2018
20:31
BSF, I am not suggesting anything just giving a view. I find it bizarre that any person from any company would attend an investor evening to deliver negative or neutral news, I have trouble seeing the point in that. Nothing to do with ramping share prices, Lupuzor and IMM as a company are a product, if you represent that product at a sales event you wouldn’t impress on the audience the negative points, you’re competitors can do that for you. I take it you’ve never been in sales as you don’t seem to understand the basics of selling your product. I believe the market sentiment since the placing has turned negative, it’s possible that IMM and TP believe that to be wrong and want an opportunity to put their side of the story, if investors then share that view and buy into the company that’s not ramping, it’s providing more information and possibly de-bunking some of the negative views on the placing which they may believe to be ill-conceived. Think you are confusing ‘ramping’; with providing a positive alternative to rumour and innuendo. All in my opinion of course.
harbourside
20/2/2018
20:17
harbourside - it's got nothing to do with my "view" it's to do with probabilities...something very much lacking with all this endless speculation on this board.

You do realise that all your suggesting is that IMM and Turner Pope ramp the share price because they don't like the market's view of IMM?

Re: would you not rather negotiate from a higher market cap then a smaller one, less ground to make up. No - because what you are suggesting is that "there is a bigger fool out there that will overpay"...

thebigshortfella
Chat Pages: Latest  593  592  591  590  589  588  587  586  585  584  583  582  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock