Hurricane Energy Share Discussion Threads

[leoneobull] 11/2/2021 18:29

Has anybody checked the TXP samples from the log wires?

[jotoha2] 11/2/2021 17:38

And another nice finish , keep it up HUR , could get really exciting here very soon.

[heialex1] 11/2/2021 17:18

Seems soAs I've said previously, extremely high risk, but equally potentially high reward. Already 50% up from lows...

[kooba] 11/2/2021 17:13

Seem to be clearing he 3p hurdle on volume and into the gap to 4p...lets see if technicals work. I don't actually think this is a leak just back on the radar with oil price move. Much still needs to be sorted for equity to relax but fingers crossed the board is on the case to maximise the significant value of the assets for all stakeholders.

[leoneobull] 11/2/2021 16:21

I've been so pre conditioned by the usual suspects to expect bad news daily I cant help thinking that some catastrophic cataclysm will occur at any moment. Gosh, wish it put my money in something safe like BITCOIN

[m5] 11/2/2021 16:17

Good to see some strength here fellas. Life in the old dog yet!!

I see the same old non holders are still here, ffs, you really have to laugh.🤣315;

[leoneobull] 11/2/2021 16:16

What could help CPR credibility is if Trice doesnt accidentally add a zero to the estimates.

[leoneobull] 11/2/2021 16:12

Sorry hur Bod. On the phone. Typos

[leoneobull] 11/2/2021 16:12

I don't imagine the Hur bid will want you to invest ngms!! If this is what you are like when uninvested, I pity the bod that has you on the register!! But ti be fair you would make a good activist investor extracting value here

[laserdisc] 11/2/2021 16:00

strong finish

[whitedukejay] 11/2/2021 15:50

Its simple really if you think the contents of an rns are suspect ,don`t invest.
But which rns are you referring to?

[ngms27] 11/2/2021 15:36

whitedukejay, no because it becomes investible again on robust news, that can be backed up and verified.

Unlikely but never say never.

[thecomposer] 11/2/2021 15:11

“Could Oil Prices Break $100 Next Year?”

[whitedukejay] 11/2/2021 14:59

taking your inconsequential interest in HUR to extremes are you not ?

[ngms27] 11/2/2021 14:38

I personally won't accept anything in the CPR without robust information that's cross checked by independent analysis given we all know how CPR's are constructed to act as a sales leaflet for the sponsor and tend to be majorly wrong.

[onlylongterm9] 11/2/2021 14:17

Noteworthy post from lse HUR bb today:

FatSam82
Today 13:37
Posts: 18
Price: 3.10

Dilution here today with Brent prices hovering above USD $61 with still significant upward momentum in place, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever in my opinion FWIW and simply because, HUR Market Cap is currently so low that amount of money potentially raised here would be insignificant both operationally and as compared to forward potential via increasing net company cash as a direct result of rising oil prices. Hence in today's fiscal friendly environment with $61+ oil prices, it would certainly be a lot easier to borrow on the open market/simply extend with bondholders (noting that expiry date is not until 24 July 2022) rather than to risk raising petty sums via some form of dilution (additional options also exist with rising oil prices as alluded to by CA in their last RNS), unless of course HUR BOD attempts otherwise! All IMOO FWIW, and please certainly DYOR.

[jotoha2] 11/2/2021 13:17

Building up speed and ready to blast into blue yonder , all we need is a positive CPR .

[laserdisc] 11/2/2021 13:03

still strong on l2

[leoneobull] 11/2/2021 12:50

Tournesol. Let's just agree you are right and correct. Sorry, on a quick lunch. Great to see Hur blue for once

[tournesol] 11/2/2021 12:26

leo

you said

...you can't force existing investors to justify in technical detail their rationale…

1) No force applied. Just a very polite request.

2) Technical detail? The poster said that the share price was more likely to return gains >100% than it was to go bust (I'm paraphrasing here). He did not say how he arrived at that conclusion. Asking him how he calculated that is hardly a forcible demand for "technical detail."

3) This is a DISCUSSION BOARD. Anything that gets posted here is open for discussion, challenge, debate, argument. (Including this!) It's entirely reasonable to ask somebody to explain the reasoning behind their assertion/assessment. If we don't do that, then we are not engaging in discussion we are just taking turns to speak without ever listening or trying to join up the dots in the material being covered.

4) Responding to a comment with a request for clarification is a compliment, not a criticism. It shows the responder is listening and thinking about the subject, rather than letting the comments wash over in an unending and unheeded stream.

[ctc1] 11/2/2021 12:25

apologies, as above the RNS

[thegreatgeraldo] 11/2/2021 12:18

katiegos - RNS 18th Dec

[katiegos] 11/2/2021 12:13

ctc1 could you tell us the source of that post 23613 TIA

[jtsouthern146] 11/2/2021 09:56

(Plus shell produce as much oil today as they did yesterday). They’ll make a mint in coming years and top leaders will be left within five to retire to live a long happy retirement.