We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Energy Plc | LSE:HUR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B580MF54 | ORD 0.1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 7.79 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 7.79 | GBX |
Hurricane Energy (HUR) Share Charts1 Year Hurricane Energy Chart |
|
1 Month Hurricane Energy Chart |
Intraday Hurricane Energy Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14/6/2025 | 22:01 | HURRICANE ENERGY - Fractured Basement WOS | 38,258 |
| 18/2/2025 | 09:16 | Hurricane Energy PLC | 57,159 |
| 26/7/2023 | 09:36 | THE REASONS I VOTED NO TO PRAX SCHEME - MK II | 2 |
| 28/4/2023 | 21:04 | My serious musings over voting NO | - |
| 20/3/2023 | 19:11 | Update | - |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/4/2025 10:56 by senseman Good Morning Vastprelea (your umpteenth reincarnation). Is that the best you can manage - same old, same old...? If a plank of wood, Trump and you took intelligence tests, the plank would score highest, Trump 2nd, and you 3rd.You are so thick you can't even read your audience right. There are many readers of both forums who worked their socks off in 21 saving HUR from 95% dilution when shares were 0.6p. Who applaud those lucky enough to, when 12.5p max was mooted, to newly buy n at 6p for potential double-bubble on the back of work done by others in 21. What they detest are gobby spivs ie, you, extrapolating from that good luck to state that 12.5p max was a fair price for HUR's assets, and anyone disagreeing was nowt but a deeply underwater whinger. You are so think you don't realise that when you attack me, you attack the majority of forum members. That's why folk hate you. Have a nice day xx |
Posted at 08/4/2025 17:20 by senseman vest - your problem being P6 still producing 6250 pp/d when HUR/Prax projection was it would be well under 5000 bp/d day now. and end necessitates Prax or Bluewater giving 6 months notice. since none currently given Sept 25 end already aint gonna happen. and we've gotten 2.5p per dcu off the back of only 17.5% of oil sales. how much do you think Prax have made off their 82.5% less costs? we'd already be at or near 12.5p if HUR had pocketing the cash. and we can reasonably assume a new producer would have been making a profit.my cat knows more about HUR/Prax than you do. you can't add up and are nasty with it. |
Posted at 08/4/2025 15:28 by senseman vast - sorry you haven't answered the question, please do - what would HUR share price be now if it had bought a 2nd producing asset at any time since June 22 bond repayment time, using some of it's cash pile? bearing in mind that monster P6 is still pumping 6250 bp/d, with no end currently in sight? |
Posted at 08/4/2025 15:06 by senseman vast - why do you persist in being so obtuse as to persist in extrapolating your personal buying in at 6.5p and receiving 12.5p max, as meaning that Prax deal was good for majority of HUR shareholders deep underwater at significantly higher prices? or are you truly so stupid you intellectually can't comprehend the difference? Also, most reasonable men comprehend that settling for 12.5p max in your case, when the upside of not selling HUR was much more, is not the mark of a wise man. And you fail to answer the relevant question - what would the share price be now if an unsold HUR had bought a 2nd producing asset at any time since bond repayment time June 22 when it had a 50 mill cash pile, or any time since Jun 23 when it had circa 120 mill cash pile? So toughen up, answer and stop avoiding the question..NB. we'll leave the HUR P6 standalone debate for another time. Suffice to say that with well P6 still pumping 6200 and already past it's fictional end of economic life date, that most ex SHs accept the HUR/Prax HUR standalone figures were a fairy story, and SHs forecasts have already been proven more accurate. |
Posted at 08/4/2025 14:35 by vastprelea Your figures for standalone HUR have always been wrong. Never even included decomm costs FFSMy average for HUR was just over 6p I was delighted by the 12.5p figure You are only disappointed as your HUR price is much higher than 6p and the 12.5p deal probably leaves you with a loss Given Brent is $65 the HUR shares price would be about 8.5p now which is exactly what we have received so far in cash |
Posted at 08/4/2025 14:10 by senseman vastprelea - 'the good Prax deal' - says it all - one who can't count, can't think, and considers it good for the average HUR shareholder to have been thrown under a bus and then raped. let's see if the imbecile has balls - what in your view, vastprelea, would HUR share price currently be if HUR had not been sold and HUR had used it's cash pile to buy a 2nd producer at any time during the past couple of years, and why? don't be shy... |
Posted at 08/4/2025 12:03 by senseman Senseman LSE: RE: Hurricane Cash 4 Apr 2025 23:44Ex HUR shareholders have to date received circa 2.5p per DCU x 2 billion shares = £50 million via 17.5% of oil sales revenue. I don't know Prax's profit from it's 82.5% less costs share, nor do I know the cost of buying the Laggan field from Total. .But one may be sure the former was more than enough to buy the latter. So now essentially Prax have gotten HUR + Laggan for nothing. Plus future profit from both. The pertinent question is - what would HUR share price have been today if HUR had not been 'sold' and the then BoD had spent some or all of the 2021 cash pile (from which our initial 6p was paid) buying a producing asset similar to Laggan? Guesstimates on a postcard please.. |
Posted at 05/9/2024 08:41 by bionictroller "because well p6 production has exceeded prax/hur's false production projections so massively that the false prax/hur well p6 standalone end of economic life 8.0p - 8.5p value was not only exceeded by dec 2023, but basic maths shows that, as things stand, by dec 2026, well p6 on a stand-alone basis, will have increased hur's cash pile to 12.5p. with shareholders still owning hur and all it's possibilities. what then would the share price currently have been - 15p-20p? (nb: i generally understate). and share price if hur had bought or were buying a producing asset (as prax are in process of doing now)? - my guesstimate is 20p-25p and rising. the green and sunny uplands would have again been in sight!"Delusional. Seek psychiatric help |
Posted at 07/7/2024 17:41 by senseman From: senseman LSE:BELATED GOOD NEWS + PERSPECTIVE (non-nutter variety)Today 17:32 WELCOME NEWS Prax 27 June announcement to buy a producing asset is welcome, long overdue good news presenting a fighting chance of us seeing 12.5p.p.sh, rather than the projected 9.5p - 10p. 12.5p will remain uncertain for several reasons:- (i) The transaction requires regulatory agreement, and also will not be completed till Q1 2025 - there being many a slip betwixt cup and lips. (ii) From HUR sale June 23 to end Q1 2025 will be circa 21 months. End Q1 2025 - end 2026 will be circa 21 months. We will have only 21 months to receive the benefit of 17.5% from the newly purchased asset. (iii) HANK13's basic calcs showing we will need to achieve circa 3.8p. p.sh from the 21 month 'dual producing asset' period to achieve the 12.5p total illustrates that it will be tight, and that we may still not get there. Also, remember that part of the new producing asset is gas ie: oil equivalent - of which, unlike oil, we currently have no idea of selling price/17.5% profit looks like. It could be more, or less, lucrative than oil sales. PERSPECTIVE Whilst Chief Nutter & his bagman scream the usual verbiage they deliberately omit to point out that:- (a) My good faith comment//opinion was posted 25 Feb. Prax's announcement was 27 June, ie: 4 months later. I don't post in bad faith, and trust my sources. It is wholly possible that Prax & Total commenced talking post 25 Feb to be able to announce a proposed deal 4 months later on 27 June. Planned deal completion not until Q1 2025 suggests a deal in principle speedily agreed, leaving much basic due diligence remaining to be done. (b) In reiterating my opinion on 30 March I wrote ... '....I doubt a purchase will occur in time to do us any good. I REMAIN HOPEFUL I AM WRONG' (my capitals). (c) Or is it their obtuse logic that despite my urging Prax to buy a producing asset because I need the money 12.5p will bring, that stating an honest opinion that I doubt such will occur makes me a liar? OVERVIEW Prax's proposed purchase of a producing asset which hopefully will see us achieving 12.5p via 17.5% of cargo sales revenue again highlights the betrayal of HUR SHs by management in selling HUR for a song. A deal of course, applauded & supported by the Chief Nutter & his bagman. The forever question for all reasonable ex HUR SHs being..'What would the SH be now if HUR had not been sold. & management had bought a similar producing asset? when:- 1. P6's exceptional production performance & +$80Brent price have already shown HUR/PRAX's P6 standalone profit figures to be a self-serving fairy tale. 2. HUR management could have (as all urged) bought a 2nd producing asset akin to that which Prax are now doing 3. The 2nd producing asset, via it's ability to jointly use the AOKA Mizu, will lower P6's production costs and thus further extend it's commercial life. 4. We would not be limited to receiving only 17.5% of offload sales. Time will reveal all. Good luck to all. Ignore the nutters |
Posted at 24/1/2024 01:02 by senseman SimonMagic is referring to the 2021 95% dilution restructuring attempt which failed (I call it HUR 1). At the start of the 3 day High Court hearing the shares were 0.6p. Had the attempt succeeded, 95% dilution would have rendered the shares worthless, ie: toilet tissue, and bondholders would have owned the company. For 4 months I worked full time to, along with CA, stop the attempt, whilst knowing I was endangering myself financially as Covid had killed dead my self employed income stream as an athletics coach, and I knew I should have been developing a new income stream. I did what I did because the old adage 'If not me, then whom?' quickly became apparent. HUR 1 was THE crucial episode/timespan You are referring to the successful sale of the company to Prax (I call it HUR 2). Most of us knew fighting it was, bar a miracle, likely to fail. But with so much at stake, and after so much effort in 2021, a small group of us could not sleep at night unless we at least tried. And I would make 2 points:- 1. The DCU payments represent 17% of HUR's Well P6's profits. Prax retain 83%. Given our initial 6.02p payment + 6.48p payments are capped at 12.5p max (which we will not achieve before the end 2026 cut-off end date because there is no sign of Prax/HUR acquiring other production assets to increase profits from which our 17% is derived, or of drilling well P8 to do similar), consider what the share price would now be if HUR 2 had failed and a still shareholder owned HUR was banking 100% of well P6's profits?. I repeat - just 17% of profits caps us at 12.5p. How far above a 12.5p share price would we be now be if a still shareholder owned HUR was banking 100% of P6 profits? 2. No one, bar the 3 of us who as shareholders attended the Sanctioning Hearing when the judge OK'd the sale, and stood and spoke in the 'barrister's section' against HUR's KC & Prax's QC, will ever understand how close we came to succeeding. The only thing which failed us was the lack of a shedload of expensive independent expert reports to back up our arguments, in the face of HUR & Prax's +£1 million quid's worth of legal preparation and 'expert opinion'. The judge (and all attending, including both KC & QC) knew it was a stitch up. But the judge effectively declared that despite misgivings, he had no option but to be guided by the +£1million quid's worth of 'expert opinion' He did have another option, but was not brave enough to exercise it in our favour. I am fighting for financial survival on account of my HUR efforts - which is why until now has not allowed me the time to become au fait with the DCU minutia - but which now makes it imperative that I do. That is why I have reached for a quick handle re how much we can expect going forward, and when. Magic - thanks for kind words |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
