Highlands Natural Resour... Share Discussion Threads

[hurricane.] 17/6/2016 07:24

How does the nomad sign off on this?

What other companies does the current HNR nomad advise ?

The red flag just started dripping with blood

[kirk 6] 17/6/2016 07:21

Haven't they just lowered the price? This seems like a fiddle. If the price drops again they will probably lower it

[supercity] 17/6/2016 07:21

It does stink of desperation going from a £1.5m to £300k in a few days

[hurricane.] 17/6/2016 07:19

Race to the bottom. Just when you thought AIM couldn't get any worse lol

[bad gateway] 17/6/2016 07:14

So Price has been stuffed by the market but hnr get a possible £2.5m cash injection at 25p? Could be worse for current buyers dependent on DTU being a success of course.

[supercity] 17/6/2016 07:09

Ha ha ha they didn't expect the sell off so lower the price - 26p to make a profit now...you couldn't make it up

[yasx] 17/6/2016 00:02

Well, I did not think for one moment there was a holder taking 10% of the equity - this was likely placed with a two bit outfit who churned it out to retail clients.

I stated at the time that Price tried to issue shares at the first spike - then they realised that there was considerable momentum given the free float and this was taken to levels plainly detached from any developmental metric (all we had noted since feb was delays). This has since enabled the warrants holders to cash in.

Anyway, confidence has now evaporated and none are now talking of Schlumberger and a fraction of the multi billion dollar market that only last week the likes of Herschel were indicating was in the bag according to his (alleged) Halliburton chap. Then we had the likes of Argyle claptrap stating they had the ear of the Head Honcho and were therefore better placed than the rest but part of the trap for novice investors was the reference to not being able to disclose the private conversations and similar rhubarb. Herschel could not disclose this alleged message from the fictitious Halliburton chap who clearly is a figment of his imagination.

How novice punters accept all this beggars belief. If the Company had good news, they would realise it to all, not to a bunch of lunatic retail investors at a two but presentation for retail mugs.

[patientcapital] 16/6/2016 23:39

Any thoughts?

16 Jun'16 - 23:10 - 7067 of 7067 1 0 edit

I'm interested to know why the 'existing shareholder' failed to declare their increased holding after the placing at 18p. Who was it? 18 to 78 in no time would have been tempting to take a decent profit. With a holding of around10% does this not seem more than a little irregular? Why has no one else queried this? Or are people blinded by the promise of untold riches if this all works out? Strange.

[yasx] 16/6/2016 23:31

Note for readers: When Keya, Doormat and those of a similar ilk indicate thy are long of anything, run for the hills.

[patientcapital] 16/6/2016 23:10

I'm interested to know why the 'existing shareholder' failed to declare their increased holding after the placing at 18p. Who was it? 18 to 78 in no time would have been tempting to take a decent profit. With a holding of around10% does this not seem more than a little irregular? Why has no one else queried this? Or are people blinded by the promise of untold riches if this all works out? Strange.

[keya5000] 16/6/2016 22:06

Bulgarian,

Appreciate your comments.

I think a poster like yourself that often is neutral from a financial perspective is a decent asset to a thread.

On a personal basis I only 'operate' in the main on the likes of ADVFN when I have a position, others who have opposite positions likewise. I never pick a complete same day pump and I invest my cash in the vehicle I promote. I also think that the majority of my picks gives a chance for any on the ride to get off at profit.

Neither am I naive enough though to expect that everyone that buys a share benefits from such. I have bought at the wrong time and never recovered my capital and made a loss on such. That is the market.

No one knows what direction this will take next, £2.5m may come in from the first tranche of warrants and the tests could be successful in July.

If so it is all sweetness and light if not time will tell.

[bulgarian] 16/6/2016 21:57

Keya,

Lets leave it there.

Good evening.

[keya5000] 16/6/2016 21:51

Bulgarian,

We have often sat on the opposing side of the divide and I would without offering any disrespect say we are in opposing camps more often than not.

You are though a poster I respect the views of and I should of not perhaps used such language in my reply to you above.

I am a long player and I look for stories/developments/progressions that can lead to bigger things.I look for value and situations that can provide such. if I believe it I will promote it and I take exception to those who challenge such and will defend my position in all situations of such nature.

Have a good evening and best regards.

[bulgarian] 16/6/2016 21:41

Then you have nothing to worry about.

[keya5000] 16/6/2016 21:39

I really cannot stand the 'holier than thou' approach a lot are taking here, have I missed a RNS that stated the tech is a failure?

One of the main loons of such an opinion professed that this was a possible 100 bagger from the 13-15p region, that for those who cannot add up is £13-£15.

That's promotion and that's also clearly documented.

I still think there is a company here,got to be honest not the same confidence I had when I was told via a company new release that tests would begin in June but that is the information I based my 'promotion' upon and its what was in the public domain at that time.

Timescales and the warrants event now in hindsight cast a different light on such but in no way can this be claimed to be a 'dud' till the event that confirms such is released formally to the market.

[bulgarian] 16/6/2016 21:38

Then, you have nothing to worry about.

[keya5000] 16/6/2016 21:34

100% clear Bulgarian, thanks again for your input.

[keya5000] 16/6/2016 21:33

barnes4,

Agree a corporate transaction of a catastrophic nature to the current share price.

However it's a long and winding road and we are far from the end of it.

The warrants have always been there, the success of the company depends on the test results, nothings changed in that regard.

If Price had entered into the same agreement I would say game over, the benefit in cash he will achieve through a nominal share of £500k (cash value to DT for the first tranche) is marginal against his original investment.

You have hardly been in the right position at the right time throughout this process so likely you are not now either.

[bulgarian] 16/6/2016 21:29

Keya,

You will be aware that there are a LOT of investors who are well underwater today on this equity?

The share price went into orbit recently for a reason, mainly due to the miniscule free float that was obvious. Backed by a copious amount of (over)promotion here and elsewhere.

If you look back in my post history, ironically I was asking very pertinent questions the day before the share price crashed, so not entirely correct on your back seat driving comment.

You are presumably fully aware and understand completely the definitions laid down by the FCA on all aspects of trading?

Just to be crystal clear.

[superg1] 16/6/2016 20:57

That's just the start of it BTW isn't it HNR.

The US is full fields with far better helium isn't it HNR massive fields double and more the yield but not viable.

How much was this per acre.....Lmao.