Highlands Natural Resour... Share Discussion Threads

[richj5000] 16/6/2016 07:20

I wonder what the FD, Mr Melvyn Davies thinks about the shenanigans yesterday? Is he in control of the CEO? I hope so!

[pathai3] 16/6/2016 07:13

Petro Matad (MATD) below 5p looks cheap

[pathai3] 16/6/2016 06:47

Highlands Natural Resources PLC (HNR) made a pretax loss of GBP1.8 million
Deloitte: Oil and Gas Underinvests by $1 Trillion
16th June 2016

[pathai3] 16/6/2016 06:47

Highlands Natural Resources PLC (HNR) made a pretax loss of GBP1.8 million
Deloitte: Oil and Gas Underinvests by $1 Trillion
16th June 2016

[tidy 2] 16/6/2016 02:07

Is this the Yas show?

[yasx] 15/6/2016 20:30

This has to be the post of the day - from Keya the dud. Just as he was reassuring others there will be no dilution, well, he and his fellow nuts got struck by the avalanche when the announcement dropped a couple of hours later. This is what happens when your idea of research is restricted to reviewing twitter comments from equally deluded nuts.

[invisage] 15/6/2016 20:11

The more stupid you are the more you lose remember Yasx.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 20:05

Some might and did argue that this was just my opinion and they were right. Others might see that Proactive video and think it an impressive team - it takes two opinions to make a market. It did not inspire confidence in me.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 20:03

There you have it chaps - I spotted various warnings/flags in advance of anyone, and therefore sold at the first opportunity. The rise thereafter was only enabled by sheer stupidity. I do not factor stupidity when assessing the merits of an investment.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 20:00

All the signs were there...


--------------------------------
yasX 13 Apr'16 - 09:36 - 610 of 2670 0 2 edit

For those who favour Price, watch his body language in the proactive piece - especially when Mendell speaks. It does not inspire confidence...

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:58

yasX 31 Mar'16 - 21:05 - 469 of 2668 0 0 edit

The Company is not managing expectations well - Price appeared garrulous in the Proactive offering but despite declaring the trials ought to have by now started (I was told exactly that), there has been nothing from the Company to indicate that this is the case. There is something about Price that does not sit right with me (his body language with Mendell on the interview made me feel he was not sitting comfortably, and his answers were generally rather 'shaky')....

Just as the trials ought to have started, we have been subjected to an avalanche of announcements about the merits of getting involved with uranium.

All rather strange, but there we are.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:57

In fairness, I felt rather fortunate that the first announcement of the June trial date arrived since by late March I had spotted several red flags which caused me to question the initial thesis and managed to exit the position at 21p.

I even highlighted the same issues back then:


yasX 23 Mar'16 - 08:59 - 279 of 2668 0 0 edit

A reader has indicated he wishes that readers were not made to wait for this report, and, if he could have a bit of an inkling as to the kind of issues that bulls need to reflect upon.

Well, off the top of my head, here are a few worth thinking about:

1. If DT Ultravert is likely to be proven a success and the technology likely to capture a share of a multi billion dollar market, who would have the best idea of the likely outcome? Paul Mendell perhaps, who is at the helm of Diversion and also on the HNR advisory team. So, why did Mendell agree to sell not only 75pc of DT Ultravert but all other current intellectual property and future IP under Diversion to HNR for a mere £750k?

2. This valued the technology at no more than £1mln since this has to be a ceiling given the rest of the IP held by Diversion was thrown into the mix. Shortly thereafter, RPS initiated at the request of the Company a dossier valuing the same technology on a NPV basis at $58 mln. What did they see that Mendell could not?
Cynics might just argue it is nothing more than a piece of promotional guff.

3.Watch the Proactive video - Price seems very uneasy when Mendell starts to talk - he looks at him and intervenes swiftly as though to prevent Mendell making a blunder.

4. If the technology is likely to be a success, and if Schlumberger really are likely to endosre the deal agreed in principal only, why did HNR only manage to raise funds at a paltry 12p (and even then it was not oversubscribed). Why were Cenkos not able to persuade the investors that this is a steal?

I could go on (and will), but, for now , that is a taster. Forget Celreritas and the uranium twaddle, focus on the more logical aspects.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:43

Technically this was a simple set up - the clue, as I pointed out a few days ago, was that the double top at 62p was accompanied by heavy volume, the first negative candle on heavy (in relative terms) volume. Today the volume was the highest it has been.

Expect more selling in the days ahead.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:23

Loverat - 22 May 2016 - 18:43:08 - 2225 of 2667
yasX

I have some knowledge in certain areas - media law for example.

----------------------------------

I confirm he is not even legally qualified, since a reliable poster on a separate thread exposed this soi disant legal mind as a numpty.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:21

He tried to subject Loglorry to the same baseless guff....

--------------------
Loverat - 25 May 2016 - 18:21:44 - 5617 of 7001
I wonder if Loglorry is posting half truths and lies to support his own personal position.
If so, I suggest he clears off. These boards were not created for his personal use and self indulgence.
--------------------

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:20

Loverat - 26 May 2016 - 19:02:45 - 2481 of 2665
Given his history of pestering directors of AIM companies I wonder if HNR directors refused to indulge him. Might explain him selling - perhaps in a huff.

---------------------------

No Dudrat, I sold because it was fairly clear to me that the shares were grossly overvalued on basic metrics, and the fact that many of the claims upon scrutiny did not add up.

You could not figure this out since you have no idea how to value anything. You merely watch price and hope for the best.

Any update on whether or not you are legally qualified. Chuckle chuckle.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:16

Dudrat even had the audacity to remind me that my decision to sell and pointing out the bear case would lead to the Company issuing proceedings against me - I jest not. He told me (scroll back chaps) that papers were being prepared and that my IP address had been noted.

Well, I this morning again checked the post and nothing has arrived. Chuckle chuckle.

In goes the boot.

[yasx] 15/6/2016 19:14

I see Dudrat was declaring himself a buyer and this a wonder stock at 75p - I tucked in at the very lows, and sold out at 21p since it became plainly clear to me the rise was without substance - I pointed out many red flags, but the nuts latched on and were buying to 70p. One can hardly forecast reliably given the sheer stupidity of the nuts.

Then Loglorry and Co arrived and essentially stated the same as I had previously laid out. But, still the shares marched higher - in the end they have now collapsed and will continue that way now that the duds have finally realised.

But, some like Garbut were lured in by the drivel form Dudrat - they are now left holding the parcel.

I posted several weeks ago that when this crashed into the 20's all will claim they sold the highs. That is what all the nuts are now professing. The reality is many of the nuts like Doormat are still holding and now looking for an exit. Jolly good news I say...

[patientcapital] 15/6/2016 18:46

No, the apologies should be given to those who bought while the rampers were ramping and selling.

I don't like to see people lose money and warned a few times briefly writing what I thought. I was right as were others. I don't want an apology but I bet a few now losing money do. But there will be none.