Empyrean Energy Share Discussion Threads

[kumala] 28/4/2022 08:16

So seams that buying yesterday has reaped profit on yesterdays buys and offseting against previous buys at earlier dates at higher prices reduces overall loss..... ...:)

[begorrah88] 28/4/2022 08:13

.....& if you add in that the Chinese may have felt 'done over' about that never explained missing deposit & all the fawning from Eme to CNOOC in every RNS you have yourselves an interesting consideration.

[kiplig] 28/4/2022 08:09

Spot on @Lushlips. EME was sold down 23% the afternoon before an RNS was announced notifying materially price sensitive news.Who would sell stock 23% down for no apparent reason? This is not irrational. Clearly there has been a leak, and clearly those selling have traded on this information. The law is clear - if the sellers were aware of this news then it is insider trading. This is a criminal offence, punishable by a prison sentence. I am investigation would be enlightening.

[oilforex] 28/4/2022 08:09

So an Empyrean conspiracy theory? Assets effectively seized by the Chinese? They hide a gushing well and give us a fiver for the remaining license? Sounds a bit farfetched to me, but Iif it was going to happen anywhere, it would happen on AIM and it would happen to EME. :-)

[lushlips] 28/4/2022 07:51

You have a sell off from people in the know the day before TD. Which is 10 days early. Being 10 days early it doesn't scare enough people into averaging down/part selling as say if it was 2 days away to TD, say day 24 and a sell off starts the day before. Something doesn't seem right to me. It will be interesting to see if the two other Wells get drilled without us and what the outcome are with these Wells.

[upwego] 28/4/2022 06:36

Probably be a big bounce today and then some steady climbing towards Duyong

All not lost

[haideralifool] 27/4/2022 22:46

lowsulphur the co. had a 40% odd chance of success and they upped it to the 60s based on their being a gas cloud (RNS before last).

As it turned out there was no oil.

This means that the assumption gas cloud=oil below was incorrect. So if the same drill were to be done again, you would not up the %CoS by the % that EME did in this instance.

[lowsulpher1] 27/4/2022 22:24

Hi ALL i think this morning RNS should be investigated by the FCA there is something not right with todays announcemente,after all we told we had a 65

[currypasty] 27/4/2022 22:20

seems a bit odd spending all that money and not have someone on the rig.. couldnt someone else from eme be there as it was life or death to us

[scaleyman] 27/4/2022 22:17

So wo counts the drill pipes for TD?

[lowsulpher1] 27/4/2022 22:05

Hi Donald Gaza was in a hotel quarantine there is something not right with todays announcement there is a to be an lot of questions to be anasards,

[the donald] 27/4/2022 21:47

Gaz was onshore supervising it. He is a geologist not a driller

[scaleyman] 27/4/2022 21:41

Someone further up the thread said Gaz was quarantined somewhere, if so who from EME was representing the company at this crucial point?

[judijudi] 27/4/2022 21:38

I presume if they had oil shows they would have slowed down 🤷‍a94;️

[lowsulpher1] 27/4/2022 21:37

Kcowe you are right it was to be 26 days to total depth why is it 10 days early question must be asked why is it 10 days early than was reported to the stockexchanged

[pacman9] 27/4/2022 19:44

I suggest you check the RNSs again. Please be at least factual.

[helpfull] 27/4/2022 19:41

Sorry my mistake. I have deleted the post.

Be careful.

[dafrog] 27/4/2022 18:26

Worst day of my shareholding days. Have quite a few at average 3 something and been holding since around 2006. EUA poor too thanks to idiot putin and JLP stagnating due to poor communication. Hope for better days for all.