We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empyrean Energy Plc | LSE:EME | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B09G2351 | ORD 0.01P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0825 | 25,571,552 | 08:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.08 | 0.085 | 0.0825 | 0.0825 | 0.0825 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs | USD | USD -9.59M | USD -0.0038 | -0.21 | 2.1M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:17:55 | O | 583,540 | 0.085 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/1/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Holding(s) in Company |
| 18/12/2024 | 14:33 | ALNC |  EARNINGS: Character Group profit up; Active Energy restored to trading |
| 18/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Interim Results |
| 04/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Holding(s) in Company |
| 02/12/2024 | 12:14 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Results of General Meeting |
| 13/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Posting of Circular |
| 12/11/2024 | 09:00 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Change of Registered Office Address |
| 11/11/2024 | 10:15 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Results of Retail Offer |
| 06/11/2024 | 07:22 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Retail Offer |
| 06/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Empyrean Energy PLC Proposed Fundraise and Capital Reorganisation |
Empyrean Energy (EME) Share Charts1 Year Empyrean Energy Chart |
|
1 Month Empyrean Energy Chart |
Intraday Empyrean Energy Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/1/2025 | 09:45 | EME - Post Sale of Sugarloaf Asset | 57,086 |
| 19/12/2024 | 04:28 | EME have a potentially transformation 2025 | 21 |
| 14/3/2024 | 18:17 | Empyrean Energy - EME - Charts and Info | 54 |
| 13/6/2023 | 12:24 | Empyrean Energy | 22,263 |
| 22/11/2022 | 14:05 | Empyrean energy | - |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 12/1/2025 08:20 by Empyrean Energy Daily Update Empyrean Energy Plc is listed in the Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker EME. The last closing price for Empyrean Energy was 0.08p.Empyrean Energy currently has 2,550,092,441 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Empyrean Energy is £2,040,074. Empyrean Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.21. This morning EME shares opened at 0.08p |
Posted at 09/1/2025 14:18 by neilyb675 Negotiated OrderYour order can not be completed automatically Your order cannot be completed automatically at this time, but can still be submitted as a negotiated order. Reasons for this could include market volatility, the size of your order, or because there is not enough electronic stock available to match your order. Because your order cannot be completed automatically we cannot guarantee the share price at the time of your trade. Your order will be sent directly to our Dealers who will negotiate the best price available for your order in the market at that time. All orders will be completed in fair and due turn as soon as is practically possible. Once you have placed a negotiated order you do not have the facility to cancel this instruction online. BUY: 1000000 EME - EMPYREAN ENERGY ORD GBP0.0001 |
Posted at 09/1/2025 13:40 by showme01 If Coro's shareholders own only 6% after debt has been cleared with 15% of Duyung, EME looks hugely undervalued as EME shareholders own it all less paying off a far smaller debt, all be it that EME only owns 8.5% of Duyung and now has a near term drill with a 40% CoS that if successful, would propel EME's value up by £10's of millions on that one commercial success, then there is Duyung. Am I missing something? |
Posted at 18/12/2024 17:08 by odillon There has been a very long history of drilling in the area JemJem. That makes new substantial finds harder to come by. To have some hope that there is a decent prospect in the target area I would need to see an independent chance of success report. That may come, and let's hope it does, but without it the Wilson project is not cause for positivity in my view.It may be straightforward to reinstate the LEI code, but if so why has it been left unaddressed since 2022? There is a pervading dysfunction that appears to afflict company officers. The lost 2 million, errors in RNS releases such as citing the wrong figure for EME's Mako stake, losing Nortrust's holding on the Aim declaration for a period, vagueness about whether CNOOC have an actionable claim against EME or not and not keeping the LEI code validated for Apnea, to name a few. As I understand it, the more time that goes by the less we stand to gain from Mako and so it would be very welcome if there is some news on that front shortly that lifts our spirits ...and the share price. |
Posted at 18/12/2024 08:01 by mrblobbythe2nd The market is a forward indicator, the stale bulls who operate here look at their losses and blame everyone but themselves, these individuals pressed the BUY button at 1p/2p+ etc.The fall in the stock price of EME over the last 12 months is mainly due to market conditions plain and simple. Worth remembering that the current m/cap of EME is just £2.4m, the Mako stake is worth multiples of that, the upcoming Cooper Basin project could multiply that market value many times also. It is not like EME is selling at a £10m+ m/cap, there is excellent upside potential here for new entrants, that is why Nortrust have built their stake to 6% and could still be adding. Buy low sell the highs. |
Posted at 08/12/2024 14:32 by lipov Development cost of 100% share of Mako is around 322m, cannot remember the exact number. If Eme keeps 4% they have to fund 13m or so. This can be easily funded and paid for from first day of revenue generation, usually up to 50% of net income each year.Wilson will be drilled otherwise placing wouldn’t occur. It is in huge interest for CEO to be drilled. Topaz and Gaz B are hand in hand, they won’t let it go. Gaz B. just has to show Cnooc 12m and will be drilled when weather permits. I believe that will happen if Eme decides to sell Mako down completely. Judijudi how long have you been in oil exploration business as a holder of companies shares? Because you are asking questions or making statement that are a bit unusual. The best you managed to figure out was that nortrust is buying for steady income and dividends. Which just going by reading your posts here on Eme, it was a bit of a ‘shocker’ |
Posted at 08/12/2024 13:18 by lipov Selling 158m will not be a problem when mako farm down occurs and Wilson well is commercial. However I agree that most likely they see high chance of EME being revenue/dividends generating in the future. Eme might well sell only portion of 8.5% and keep the rest for nice income after 2026. I wouldn’t be surprised if Eme only sells portion which would be equivalent in relative terms to Conrad sell down. Conrad will probably want to keep minority stake and Eme too. There is a good upside exploration potential in Duyung asset. Why say no to it?! New Mako developer would want to have certainly above 50% if not much more.Eme and Conrad did similar type of sell transaction to Coro where both of them decided to sell just a portion of Duyung license to Coro. I think Eme did give away 1.5%. So, agree that Nortrust is here because there is high chance Eme will be a good revenue generating company (dividends)and if Wilson comes in, even better. Highly likely after reading Conrad presentation and their rns that sell down will be completed shortly and Fid as well, max end of q1 imo. |
Posted at 03/12/2024 17:06 by cashandcard MrBlobbly,I share alot of your sentiment. Seen this for over two decades back from the 90s. But there are a few painful realities PIs must accept;#the likelihood of losing every penny on a given stock.#catastrophic financial ruin when overexposed or with total exposure to this area.#Instability and constant need for cash/liquidity.#Shor |
Posted at 02/12/2024 12:38 by helpfull Tickety Tock!Congratulations to all shareholders in the passing of all resolutions. You had your chance and decided to not take it. What is amusing is that some thought a protest vote might be detrimental to the share price performance. A share price down from 10p (and above) to 0.115p. Be careful. |
Posted at 15/11/2024 00:55 by odillon Nelly the 8 October 2024 RNS demonstrates how the notification procedure works. As you have quoted it refers to EME having been notified of the Nortrust 58,000,000 shareholding on 7 October 2024.Having been so notified, EME had the legal obligation to publicise all the details of the notification by the end of the next working day. Hence the RNS on 8 October. So on that occasion EME complied with the legal requirement by publicising the full details of the TR-1 form received from Nortrust the day after they received it. At that stage Nortrust were listed as significant shareholders holding 58 million shares on the EME website. They are no longer listed on the EME website. So either that is a mistake or Nortrust have reduced their holding to below 3%. I think it is the latter and that was the reason for the AIM information being updated on the 6th of November. If as I suspect Nortrust have reduced their holding below 3% then it appears that EME have failed in their legal obligation to publicise this. 2 |
Posted at 13/11/2024 15:06 by odillon Isn't it the case that the c note holders have an interest in obtaining the best possible price for Mako as they get 15% of EME's share of it under the agreement? if it is sold cheap then they sell themselves short.As far as I understand it that would be the same claim that they would be making against EME if the company went into administration (along with any unpaid interest). So why sell Mako cheap? As I understand it they would need to work with EME to sell as soon as reasonably possible if Conrad fail to sell EME's share. So that eventuality is connected to Conrad's performance which is out of EME's hands. But again, why sell cheap? The fundraiser is for £1.12m which is well below the extant company liabilities (even without taking the 12m CNOOC claim into account) and is "for the Company's general working capital purposes and, if appropriate, to drill the Wilson prospect" |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
