ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

CGNR Conroy Gold & Natural Resources Plc

9.75
0.00 (0.00%)
22 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Conroy Gold & Natural Resources Plc LSE:CGNR London Ordinary Share IE00BZ4BTZ13 ORD EUR0.001 (CDI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 9.75 8.50 10.00 - 0.00 07:39:14
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Gold Ores 257k -363k -0.0081 -12.04 4.36M
Conroy Gold & Natural Resources Plc is listed in the Gold Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CGNR. The last closing price for Conroy Gold & Natural Re... was 9.75p. Over the last year, Conroy Gold & Natural Re... shares have traded in a share price range of 8.25p to 17.50p.

Conroy Gold & Natural Re... currently has 44,756,101 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Conroy Gold & Natural Re... is £4.36 million. Conroy Gold & Natural Re... has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -12.04.

Conroy Gold & Natural Re... Share Discussion Threads

Showing 6926 to 6949 of 11700 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  288  287  286  285  284  283  282  281  280  279  278  277  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
14/10/2015
12:11
This will bounce back up.Only at this level due to people losing faith due to the wait.Fundamentals dictate a far higher price.The price is now completely out of kilter with what is happening, in my opinion now is the right time to buy.Derampers love to talk rubbish .
newprom
14/10/2015
11:34
Bid heading for 0.25 I think its all over for current holders
rbonnier
14/10/2015
11:02
regular progress reports wouldn't go amiss either. Informing shareholders of what value is being generated from the massive directors fees!!

I totally agree with 4marlin - "Remuneration v total spend/exploration spend/whatever is totally out of kilter.
Quite disgusting and morally repugnant."

j0no5
14/10/2015
09:05
Certainly a big case for a reduction in directors remuneration ,I would agree.
newprom
14/10/2015
08:52
It does not matter how one looks at it:

Remuneration v total spend/exploration spend/whatever is totally out of kilter.
Quite disgusting and morally repugnant.

4marlin
13/10/2015
22:45
Let's try facts folks. 2014 accounts:

Operating expenses were €1,039k

Of which Directors total remuneration was €638k (61% of operating expenses)

Tangible Fixed Asset additions (usually a good sign of progress) €5k

I also noticed that they capitalise a big wedge of operating expenses (€665k) to the Balance Sheet, which makes the loss for 2014 look much less than it would otherwise have been. That's one way of making the Balance Sheet look busy and solvent, but it's aggressive accounting, particularly capitalising salaries.

No ulterior agenda, but IMHO the salaries are too high relative to market cap.

When it comes to this share, the penny truly has dropped (by half.)

craffert
13/10/2015
15:17
Cynical.Lets look at your last few posts.We can take it that you dont want to spend money on salaries but you do want to build a processing plant! jeez....just glad you dont run the company!!!
newprom
13/10/2015
14:48
Cynical.You could put your brain into gear before coming out with statements such as ....they need to build a processing plant.....what, right now!...in the next few months???....Cynical your deramping is getting even more ridiculous!!
newprom
13/10/2015
14:16
newprom - I am not sure what makes you so optimistic.......in case you hadn't noticed, the share price is a fraction of the nominal share price.....so funding at this point is going to be interesting.........anybody like to bet a pint of the black stuff on a capital reorganisation within 12 months?
thecynical1
13/10/2015
14:14
jono....glad to hear that progress is being made on the golf front......maybe they'll abandon plans to produce gold and build a golf complex.....?
thecynical1
13/10/2015
14:12
little in the way of equipment required.......that's a laugh.....they need to build a processing plant....that is if they ever get round to finding anyone to fund it for them............. : )
thecynical1
13/10/2015
13:26
Marlin.I listen to your points.In many ways it has not gone to the script but think we are arriving at a crunch point,which is what we all need to get things to happen.
newprom
13/10/2015
13:18
newprom:

I may be totally wrong and that there is a vast amount of work going on behind the scenes but that is not my view.
The lights and salaries are being paid...but that is about all imo.

3 or 4 yrs ago the prof told me the mine ought to be up and running in 2016.
It is something he has been saying for about 15 yrs now.
We do not even have any permits or planning permission......but, we do have a project or mine manager, or something like that.
Seriously far out.

4marlin
13/10/2015
12:58
they have enough infill drilling to do to see the prof good for the rest of his life, no need for retirement. i heard the professors golf is on top form ATM, that's the only progress being made here!

this share would be much more amusing if i weren't a shareholder!!

j0no5
13/10/2015
12:48
Marlin.The last time they announced drill results you were very surprised as you thought they were not doing anything.Is that not right? So it is patently clear you are not in the loop.Would you not agree?
newprom
13/10/2015
12:16
Newprom:

I think the pertinent question is how far have they got with salaries?

Almost nothing is being done.

On life support.

The warning (one of many) was Pageant leaving.

4marlin
13/10/2015
11:14
Serious answers to these questions needed!
newprom
13/10/2015
11:13
How far do you think they will get without paying salaries?
newprom
13/10/2015
11:11
With probably little in the way of equipment now needed,what do you think they should spend the money on?.
newprom
13/10/2015
10:21
no, I don't. If even you admit that salaries/fees are a large percentage of expenditure, what positives do you see? I see a gravy train....but hey, jmo.
thecynical1
13/10/2015
08:18
A large percentage of the present expenditure will be salaries that goes without saying.You have a jaundiced view of what is happening.
newprom
13/10/2015
08:07
it must be imteresting to live in a parallel world like you appear to. These guys are creaming it while the share price is in what looks like a permanent decline. When is the penny going to drop? What is the market cap? Compare that with the cost of fees, pension entitlements etc...............and what do you get???? And just to make it interesting, what percentage of their present expenditure is on exploration/development compared to fees/salaries/pension entitlements????? Might be time to take off those oddly-coloured glasses my friend!
thecynical1
13/10/2015
07:48
Cynical.A semblance of bitterness there??? We have made progress and it is a case of waiting.With a market cap at just over 2 million pounds the risk to reward is compelling.Easy to crib the company but for those who can think beyond your cynicism then the rewards are huge.The rewards can be astronomical .We have a great team and some proven resources and now after a lot of hard work when things could suddenly come together and with such a low market cap is the time to invest.Be warned against the likes of cynical and craffert as they undoubtedly have an agenda.Be especially wary of craffert with his track record of losing money on recommendations on this board.
newprom
10/10/2015
08:32
Craffert.I like that apology.And the fact that you acknowledge that anybody who listens to you is silly.Thank you.
newprom
Chat Pages: Latest  288  287  286  285  284  283  282  281  280  279  278  277  Older