Conroy Gold & Natural Re... Share Discussion Threads

[craffert] 22/6/2015 09:53

indeed...why risk more you ask from the Prof's perspective. But you can't apply that logic to anyone else's hard earned cash? And the Prof is "no mug" but he has consistently invested at much higher share prices. I would suggest that he is no mug because it doesn't really matter hughly to him what share price he goes in at, because what he invests is simply a recycle of other investors money in placings which become fees and salaries, some of which go back into the company as equity, which creates the appearance of commitment until you understand the way the whole game works.

[newprom] 20/6/2015 16:32

Craffert.The professor is no mug and he has invested large amounts into his companies.Why risk even more? He has invested into the company consistently and at much higher than share price I am sorry to say this but you sound like a mug who would invest everything.

[craffert] 20/6/2015 15:10

what a load of old tosh. If he truly is a multi millionaire and he really does believe in this and doesn't / didn't have the cash, he could easily obtain funding using equity in the "eggs" whether those eggs are property, equities, bonds or whatever. Any bank would advance funds in return for decent unencumbered security. Not sure if you are aware that it's quite easy and quite normal for multi millionaires to do this. Or of course, you play a smarter game and plead you have no cash to invest, but what you really mean is you don't want to risk your other eggs (but have no problem with other punters risking their hard earned to keep you going.) Yes. Wise indeed. And telling. I would have more respect for a man who shows his absolute confidence by putting the majority of his personal wealth into his projects alongside the mere mortals who participate in placings.

[newprom] 20/6/2015 08:45

Kevjones2.You have obviously done well by the professor and have a very positive mindset.Please keep posting as your posts are very much needed on this board to balance the nonsense the negative gang are posting.

[newprom] 20/6/2015 07:49

Kevjones2.They are very adept at twisting everything into a negative spin.You hit the nail on the head with your post.They certainly demonstrate a breathtaking lack of basic intelligence.Measuring someone based on how long they've been registered on advfn is typical of the negative gang.The Professor is without doubt a multimillionaire but that will not mean his money is not tied up in other things.Craffert. Have you ever heard of not putting all your eggs in one basket.A good saying and very wise.How you love to twist things!Amazing really!

[craffert] 19/6/2015 22:23

If the Prof is such a well heeled multi millionaire then why did he tell me (one to one!) that he didn't buy shares in CGNR on the open market because he didn't have the money to do so. I took him at his word. And that was ten years ago when most Irish personal property wealth was pretty much at its peak. Does he prop up his multimillionaire status with the astronomical fees he takes from his listed interests?

Just out of interest, how did the Prof make you a small fortune with Galmoy? Presumably it had nothing to do with the O'Reilly rescue money + turnaround + subsequent sale to Lundin?

Over to you KevJones. Do share.

[kevjones2] 19/6/2015 21:07

Lol. Measuring the experience of someone based on how long they've been registered on ADVFN requires a breathtaking lack of basic intelligence. Kudos to Thecynical for achieving said levels so low that even the other morons aren't jumping in childlike to support him.

As for serial nondeliverer, the Prof, well he made himself a multimillionaire, and myself a small fortune,with Galmoy. Long may he .. nondeliver.In fairness, he couldn't have done it without the original funders even though a handful of the impatient ones turned against him and stupidly backed out. A few of those bitter serial losers can be read here. Again, I'd like to thank them for funding CGNR.

[4marlin] 19/6/2015 12:11

This serial non-deliverer has thankfully taught me lessons I am very grateful for.

A couple of my gold picks which do, I think, meet rigorous screening/filtering criteria are now coming very good.
I expect others will too.

Not sure whether we have hit the bottom for gold prices but, if not, we are close.

A great deal of money will be made from being invested in the right companies.
Although things may change, this company presently is not one of them and I do not think it is close to so being.
The RNSs are clutching at straws.

Good luck all.

[thecynical1] 18/6/2015 10:26

Kev.....an experienced ADVFNer.......since Oct. 2013.....

[thecynical1] 18/6/2015 10:25

KevJones.....a man with a way with words........

[actybod] 18/6/2015 08:35

Share prophets - lol. Expecting a share going to 2 but at 10 now. Dyor

[newprom] 18/6/2015 01:39

KevJones.Dont worry about getting their names right.Rumour has it that they often forget who they have signed in as . Must be difficult for them keeping tabs on all their names.!

[newprom] 17/6/2015 22:58

Craffert.....yeah...I thought you might find that funny...We might not agree ...but at least we can have a laugh about it.

[kevjones2] 17/6/2015 22:02

Meh. I'm not concerned about craffert, thecynical or the other guys whose money got us to where we are today. Losers always lose. Every post they make is a reminder to the rest of us that we wouldn't be here but for their shortsighted greediness. I bought in 2013 hoping for serious developments around 2018. I now expect developments in Q415 or H12016. Yet another success from the Prof would not have happened without the brainless flotsam (and cash) of the likes of those bitter clowns that actually funded us. Lol. I hope I got the morons names right!

[craffert] 17/6/2015 21:58

Sometimes you're funny newprom. You could be a professor too!

[newprom] 17/6/2015 17:39

Don't laugh.But 3 years!

[kaos3] 17/6/2015 16:42

Do you have any time objectives newprom regarding the operating mine? What would be reasonable for you? What year without BUTs and IFs?

[mineng] 17/6/2015 16:21

by Robert Tyerman

[newprom] 17/6/2015 14:48

Just because these people did not get out of the prof what they wanted and were maybe talking to him at the wrong time does not mean that he is wrong or that the right time is nearly upon us.

[newprom] 17/6/2015 13:52

Craffert you do not ring true with your last post.You have several times posted on here saying you had purchased different shares only for those shares to lose most of their value.You have not posted on those sites.Why do you have an obsession with the professors companies?.I am guessing at a personal vendetta,is that right? .Even you for the first and only time have admitted a few positives recently.The fact you have said that I am taking as extremely positive.I think deep down you know the professor is right and that is what you and the other negative gang are really afraid of.Is that right? You can be honest for once.

[4marlin] 17/6/2015 12:31

rather well said, craffs.

[craffert] 17/6/2015 12:03

newprom: the answer is, and always has been, to warn others of the Professors track record of over promising and abjectly under delivering. And to remind others of his rose tinted view of his own past successes in he mining game versus the historical timelines.

You and your ilk regard that as bashing and paid de-ramping and all sorts of other fantasy things but there is nothing sinister to it at all. To me [and others] it is just a wee warning bell to other prospective investors contemplating CGNR to give them some perspective on the rubbish posted by you, goldeneye and emmo.

While you lot spout all the positives (and there are a few positives) other folks here with more years will add their own experiences and facts.

[emmo1210] 17/6/2015 10:37

Not to mention going to the AGMs year in year out to a company which they have no regard for. Odd for sure.

[newprom] 17/6/2015 08:48

Why do certain individuals post on the professors companies constantly when they have no investment, but do not post on other companies they have investments in? Surely investors main concern should be investments that one holds?