![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conroy Gold & Natural Resources Plc | LSE:CGNR | London | Ordinary Share | IE00BZ4BTZ13 | ORD EUR0.001 (CDI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 7.875 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 7.875 | 7.875 | 7.88 | 5,207 | 07:44:55 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 257k | -363k | -0.0081 | -9.72 | 3.52M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
15/6/2015 11:52 | hilarious........... | ![]() thecynical1 | |
15/6/2015 11:28 | A very strange coincidence.That is why I have dubbed them the negative gang.Because whatever good news happens it is always painted into a negative stance.What is their real purpose ? Goldemeye ,I respect your opinion .What do you think? | newprom | |
15/6/2015 11:19 | Just noticed a really strange coincidence.RBonnier | newprom | |
15/6/2015 11:16 | classic......the C3 cost for gold is now apparently dependent somehow on the antimony that is supposedly available for extraction/processin Newprom........have they actually published the c3 value for their project? all I can find are c1 values............ | ![]() thecynical1 | |
15/6/2015 10:54 | Cynical.6546.RBonnie | newprom | |
15/6/2015 10:45 | not sure what the projected c3 cost is now as antimony should change it.We are told payback in 2 years but once again that is before antimony is put into the equation. | newprom | |
15/6/2015 08:31 | what is the projected c3 cost here again? remind me......? | ![]() thecynical1 | |
15/6/2015 08:31 | 6546.....a classic! | ![]() thecynical1 | |
15/6/2015 08:25 | Ministers would describe a pile of @€&t as exciting if they thought it would get them a positive headline! Jmo. | ![]() thecynical1 | |
12/6/2015 08:41 | RBonnier.The man posting skeletons of death on the kdr board yesterday.Says it all really! Pathetic and stupid but typical of the negative gang. | newprom | |
12/6/2015 07:21 | Of course it has no relevance. Clontibret is what ......60km from Omagh so geological proximity means nothing? Also CGNR have targets both sides of the border. Bot North and Republic are pro mining. Operation of planning system has changed in Northern Ireland since 1st April 2015 in terms of it's structural organisation, meaning mining applications are now applications of regional significance. I note that CGNR licences in the north cover a very large area. Galantas have had many planning enforcement cases if I'm not mistaken so 3yrs is not so bad as they haven't exactly been squeaky clean. | goldeneye5 | |
12/6/2015 06:36 | Looking good for the Professor and cgnr.The negative gang can moan and whine all they like but progress is being made and things have never been better for this company.A few more hurdles to jump to the winning line but we are definitely in a good position on the home straight. | newprom | |
12/6/2015 06:20 | Both governments are very pro mining.Government ministers on both sides have described the possibility of gold mining as very "exciting",.The professor has knowledge of how government departments work ,having been a minister himself and also plenty of influential contacts.The Galantas news is relevant because it should make things easier for cgnr to get planning.Negativity is not called for in this instance as this announcement is wholly positive. | newprom | |
11/6/2015 22:27 | Planning permission granted in omagh for galantas today....all good for gold mining on the island of Ireland Different country (UK) Different planning system (it still took 3 years to achieve!) Different company - Galantas have a surface mine, producing gold. Different type of gold Richer gold grades - 6oz/t to 8 oz/t and break even cash cost of $660/oz Different backers - Kenglo One sit behind Galantas as a funder. Deep pockets. Bit of a stretch in credibility to pretend it has any relevance to Conroy. | ![]() craffert | |
11/6/2015 12:19 | Unlikely I believe... I could be wrong of course. | goldeneye5 | |
11/6/2015 12:09 | my guess is that a placing will be nec. soonish...which will probably necessitate another capital reorganization. Even if one were a bull, for that reason alone, no need to buy now. | ![]() 4marlin | |
11/6/2015 12:09 | Planning permission granted in omagh for galantas today....all good for gold mining on the island of Ireland | goldeneye5 | |
11/6/2015 09:08 | What his detractors fail to see is that companies such as kdr have the odds heavily stacked against them.It is very high risk but also very high reward.The recent news has shortened those odds considerably.Whilst the odds may still be against the company finding diamonds,to be in this position is good.Very good.You need to balance the risk against the reward.If you dont like risk then shares such as cgnr and kdr are not for you.In the case of cgnr the risks are actually not as high because they have proven resources. | newprom | |
11/6/2015 08:58 | The professor has put kdr in a position that there is a very good chance of finding diamonds.Others have spent huge amounts ,many times the proffessors budget and found no diamonds.He has done extremely well.Even his detractors would find it very hard to say otherwise. | newprom | |
11/6/2015 08:52 | "The professor has done well" YES | ![]() odvod | |
10/6/2015 23:14 | Professors are often described as nutty.But usually those same professors are super intelligent.The professor has done well on a shoe string budget.Far better than the other explorers in the same area with many times the budget he has had.There is a good chance of finding diamonds now.Will you still have the same opinion if he does find diamonds? Of course you will,you cant help your obsession with him,can you? | newprom | |
10/6/2015 22:10 | "Could the prof sell or do a deal with Karelian to finance cgnr?" the bit after "or" sounds like a nutty professor thought to me. | ![]() craffert | |
10/6/2015 21:57 | Craffert.It is you that does not think straight.In fact you seem incapable of any positive thought whatsover.It would make finamcial sense for the professor to cash in his chips on finding a deposit of diamonds.I never mentioned using kdr cash for the benefit of cgnr.They are seperate companies. | newprom |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions