Conroy Gold & Natural Re... Share Discussion Threads

[thecynical1] 14/7/2015 21:19

Thanks! Nicest thing anyone has said to me on here in ages! LOL!

[newprom] 14/7/2015 15:51

But if it came to yawning or making insidious statements you are world class.

[newprom] 14/7/2015 14:48

But then again your not exactly famed for yours.Cutting or otherwise.

[newprom] 14/7/2015 14:46

Cynical.Talking of cutting wit.You seem to have forgotten yours!

[newprom] 14/7/2015 11:27

Cynical.Dont bother.He could not afford my fees.

[thecynical1] 14/7/2015 11:08

newprom......I'll ask John Bishop whether he'd give you a chance to impress with your cutting wit! : )

[newprom] 13/7/2015 22:09

you managed to pick 2 shares that were 100 times worse than cgnr and yet you have the nerve to attack the share performance.Some performance and some nerve.

[newprom] 13/7/2015 21:45

Craffert.Pay attention.I never said you were the one to mention John Bishop.Just that we all like a good laugh.And have you any good share selections we can laugh at!

[craffert] 13/7/2015 21:28

I wasn't the one to mention John Bishop. Pay a bit more attention to detail. But then again, I am asking for this of someone who still believes in CGNR.

[thecynical1] 13/7/2015 16:52

seriously......."facts"............that has got to be the most hilarious post ever...........too xxxxing funny.......maybe you should ring John Bishop......... : )

[newprom] 13/7/2015 13:30

Emmo.I have watched and posted on here for a few years.I understand your view point as I have periodically let them bash away without responding.But essentially they are bulletin board bullies who try to bully people from posting by attacking them.At different times they have attacked yourself,goldeneye,kev and myself for expressing a well founded view of things using facts rather than there fiction.I never used to but I now try to show them up for how ludicrous they actually are.I also notice that you are good at showing them up.I think this is the only way to deal with them.I could not now let them peddle their rubbish without responding to them as that would be letting the bullies win.

[emmo1210] 13/7/2015 11:42

GE - much better to sit and wait for the rewards if you are confident in your research - any engagement with these fools on here is obviously a waste of time; let them bash away, at this stage they have nothing new to add. Anyone who attends or attempts to attend the AGM frequently of a company yet does nothing but ridicule it obviously does not fall into the category of someone who exhibits normal behaviour. They lost money - it hurts - more so their mistake than the money probably. If it makes them feel better pushing blame for their decision making elsewhere sobeit - it is inconsequential.

[thecynical1] 13/7/2015 09:04

wow................funny how some posters appear to exist in some kind of parallel universe........LOL!

[goldeneye5] 13/7/2015 08:48

7.45 am on a Monday morning, on a share that hasn't done anything for donkeys years.......petty squabbles....seriously?It's making me tired all over!

[newprom] 13/7/2015 08:39

Craffert and cynical.I would think it self evident for anybody reading these posts to see who out of the bulls and bears talks most sense and gives the facts rather than suppositions.The bulls attack the bears because they present no credible facts,whilst the bulls look at the true circumstances.

[thecynical1] 13/7/2015 07:45

It is by the way seriously incredible that some of the apparently intellectually challenged posters on here think that they know how much other posters on here have made or lost on this share......hello.....real world.......you haven't a clue about what other posts have or haven't made or lost.......and every post along those lines confirms the tenuous nature of your grasp on reality....get over yourselves and get a life...

[thecynical1] 13/7/2015 07:42

craffert......there is no point making it easy for Kev.......it possibly doesn't matter how easy you make it.........it'll still be too complicated! : ) what is the latest estimate of the current cash position btw?

[thecynical1] 13/7/2015 07:39

Nice post 6672....your intellectual capacity is imo stunning......but hey.......if you tried making a few credible points instead of having a go at people, you might have a bit more credibility regardless of the apparent IQ.....

newprom 10 Jul'15 - 08:58 - 6672 of 6680 0 0

Cynical.A rude condescending twerp.....now that is personal ...but the truth.

[craffert] 12/7/2015 23:21

Kev - let me make it easy for you. I put a few grand into CGNR in 2004 at about 3.5p and I got most of it again on a spike in Dec 2005, and the rest at a small loss at 3p the following year. So I hardly qualify as a DCB when this was just a bit of a punt. Hardly enough to be bitter.

As I said to others, just phone the Prof and ask him the question yourself. In fact, why not just ask him how many times and to how many people he has said that he expects to have a mine up and running within 3 years. I doubt that you actually want to make that call just in case it turns out to be true.

[kevjones2] 12/7/2015 22:37

I'm sensing Crafty Craffert will not be able to produce a statement from the Prof where the Prof categorically stated there would be a mining operation within 3 years, ever.

Maybe Craffert's wingman TheCynical (despite the latter ridiculing the former's comments) will try to twist words like 'hope', 'expectation' and others into categorical statements about CGNR's future? Maybe they'll just acknowledge they lost lots of money (by their standards) by investing in a newbie mining company? Meh, who knows what really drives DCBs?

Regardless, never let us forget Disgruntled Company Builders like Craffert and his crafty former lickspittle TheCynical. They helped to build CGNR and whilst I know they've lost huge money (to them) I hope they eventually realise that any success of CGNR will help to minimise their huge losses.

[newprom] 10/7/2015 22:30

Craffert.The share price has not performed well at tall (but your share tips on a monthly average both performed 100 times worse) But there were mitigating circumstances i.e. low gold price and then a poor environment for junior explorers.Without the professor the company would probably have folded.The professor receives a package which is fair when you consider that he ploughs most of it back into the company ,usually at a higher than s.p.The professor has never stated categorically that we will be mining in 3 years.If you think he has please answer kevs question.The company has moved into a position where we must be close to getting a jv partner.A position we were not previously near to.We have a proven resource with the ability to mine profitably and then greatly increase resources further.The great thing about this share is the low market capitalisation of 3 million pounds.A prospective partner could easily value what we have at many times this amount and still be getting a fantastic bargain.With the prospects of the monetary system in deep trouble if the major economies continue to build debt it looks good for gold,especially cgnr.

[newprom] 10/7/2015 21:46

Kevjones. Crafferts well established credibility.......just like crafferts well established ability to pick shares.....and his well established ability to not hold a grudge....and his well established ability to always tell the truth.....and his well established ability to always answer questions....

[kevjones2] 10/7/2015 20:51

But Crafty, surely you can actually refer me to even one instance when your confidante categorically stated there would be a mine up and running within 3 years. Even go back to the early 2000s as you said (for now we'll let go about your '20 years' stuff).

Oh, and whilst even the most cynical of us (including your current side-kick TheCynical) absolutely believe that the Professor discussed his personal finances with you in 2005, just because you say the Prof said other stuff publicly about mining datelines, doesn't make it so. So, in order to maintain your well established credibility I cordially request (again) one example of the Prof stating categorically that there would be a mine up and running within 3 years, as you have repeatedly posted he stated. Ta.