ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

BUR Burford Capital Limited

1,058.00
-9.00 (-0.84%)
29 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Burford Capital Limited LSE:BUR London Ordinary Share GG00BMGYLN96 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -9.00 -0.84% 1,058.00 1,058.00 1,060.00 1,090.00 1,054.00 1,067.00 137,397 16:29:44
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt 1.39B 610.52M - N/A 2.33B
Burford Capital Limited is listed in the Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BUR. The last closing price for Burford Capital was 1,067p. Over the last year, Burford Capital shares have traded in a share price range of 975.50p to 1,387.00p.

Burford Capital currently has 218,646,081 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Burford Capital is £2.33 billion.

Burford Capital Share Discussion Threads

Showing 12726 to 12747 of 26225 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  521  520  519  518  517  516  515  514  513  512  511  510  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
04/9/2019
10:33
4th attempt today to clear £7.00p once through I think a good rise will come.
wardy333
04/9/2019
09:58
adnan

"Henchard - you proved my point Tesco clearly state "no provision was required".

So why do Tesco believe no provision is required for there legal liabilities. But yet you expect Burford to set aside provisions?"

Nowhere have I said I expect BUR to make provisions. You must be thinking of another poster.

Obviously, if a potential liability meets the criteria for requiring a provision, a provision will be made.

I'm surprised, though, given the nature of BUR's business, that it mentions no contingent liabilities.

henchard
04/9/2019
09:48
All four Buford bonds are rising today against a backdrop of generally declining bond markets, that speaks volumes
lgm1
04/9/2019
09:47
Henchard - you proved my point Tesco clearly state "no provision was required".

So why do Tesco believe no provision is required for there legal liabilities. But yet you expect Burford to set aside provisions?

"Contingent liabilities: The Committee further considered management’s assessment of the status of ongoing regulatory investigations and litigation relating to prior periods. The Committee concurred with management’s assessment that due to the stage of the remaining matters and the uncertainties regarding the outcomes, no provision was required, and disclosure as contingent liabilities at the year end was appropriate. See Note 32 to the financial statements."

"As previously reported, Tesco Stores Limited has received claims from current and former Tesco store colleagues alleging that their work is of equal value to that of colleagues working in Tesco’s distribution centres and that differences in terms and conditions relating to pay are not objectively justifiable. The claimants are seeking the differential between the pay terms looking back, and equivalence of pay terms moving forward. At present, the likely number of claims that may be received and the merit, likely outcome and potential impact on the Group of any such litigation is subject to a number of significant uncertainties and therefore, the Group cannot make any assessment of the likely outcome or quantum of any such litigation as at the date of this disclosure. There are substantial factual and legal defences to these claims and the Group intends to defend them"

So, they have mentioned it, but they have not set aside any provisions for it. Even though the cases have been ongoing for 3 years.

That was the whole issue that SweetK raised.

adnan17
04/9/2019
09:38
Nowt more to be said.
achenaton
04/9/2019
09:31
I have no need to explain anything I only post as nw99 get off my back
nw99
04/9/2019
09:31
Explain posts 12093 and 12098 then.
achenaton
04/9/2019
09:23
Go back and look at previous posts on other threads tell me we are connected I don't think so
nw99
04/9/2019
09:17
nw99 and ONJohn

Explain posts 12093 and 12098 then.

You've got to laugh - can't even work out which name they're supposed to be posting under.

Also talking to each other at one point.

achenaton
04/9/2019
09:09
Adding more here
nw99
04/9/2019
09:08
No cannot stand that poster
nw99
04/9/2019
09:08
nw99 nothing to do with him
nw99
04/9/2019
08:56
nw99 / ONJohn

One and same? Posts 12093 and 12098.

achenaton
04/9/2019
08:18
Any upward progress stopped by the A/Ts, will need some decent news here to start a decent recovery.
wardy333
04/9/2019
08:05
should see 700p + to day.
1corrado
04/9/2019
07:49
ONJohn,

Are you nw99 as well?

achenaton
04/9/2019
07:15
Should get muddy response today


can see 500p

onjohn
04/9/2019
00:08
nw99

You wouldn't also be poster ONJohn as well would you, by any chance?

achenaton
03/9/2019
22:55
Yes all good value
nw99
03/9/2019
22:24
Burford capital 22, 24 and 26 retail bonds have in fact gone up in price today, see the London stock exchange retail bond prices
lgm1
03/9/2019
21:57
I can see what johnwig means! He’s definitely trying to bore us to death. Truly obsessional.
brianarthur1939
03/9/2019
21:57
In contrast to Tesco, BUR makes no reference to contingent liabilities in its last annual report. Aside from under note "28. Financial commitments and contingent liabilities" where we have "At 31 December 2018, the Group had outstanding commitments for $646,631,000 of which $618,338,000 are for investments and $28,293,000 are for new initiative investments" but no contingent liabilities at all are mentioned.
henchard
Chat Pages: Latest  521  520  519  518  517  516  515  514  513  512  511  510  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock