Avanti Communications Share Discussion Threads

[n3tleylucas] 07/6/2012 10:18

anticipation can be more rewarding? ... maybe time it to close on 26th? ... tdw let you close on t2 ... so ... that makes 31st July settlement? ... trackback 20 trading days ... so open on 3rd July? ... close on or before 26th imo ... gl!!!

[nugacity] 07/6/2012 10:05

July 27th then - cheers Netley.

Over 3 weeks late and how long is a T20?
Share trading is a bit like true love - never runs smooth!

[n3tleylucas] 07/6/2012 09:59

? 27th July?

[nugacity] 07/6/2012 09:44

Did a dummy sell to clear my T20 and would have been down 20 shares.
Will have to keep my fingers crossed there is no delay as reported here....

[nugacity] 07/6/2012 09:36

AVANTI COMMUNICATIONS GROUP PLC ORD 1P
Bid 305.25p
Offer 310.5p

Spread closing - and I can close my T20 @ 3.0299p - but unsure what to do.
Some are reporting the launch is gong to be delayed because of our partners on Ariane but, were that to be true, won't there be an insurance claim against them?

With a July launch I felt secure on my T20 but now it is not up in the air :O(

[johncsimpson] 07/6/2012 07:57

Colva,

My sincere apologies. I have, as you suggested, re-read all the posts and can now see that I was out of order. My apologies also go to backmarker. As you have suggested on the other thread it would be best to move on.

I would also like to apologise to jonnib and yorgi for similar disagreements / spats.

This is how my graph looked last night:



As you will see from the MACD histogram, AVN has almost passed through it's 'down cycle'.

There was evidence of underlying strengthening yesterday afternoon and it should not be long before the price moves forwards.

All IMO

[colva] 07/6/2012 04:28

jonnib.

Yes , better leave him to it and move on.

[colva] 07/6/2012 04:17

johncsimpson,

I don't believe that you'r stupid so i can only assume that you are continuing to "misunderstand" so that you don't have to face the fact that a large chunk of your post no.73 is totally out of order.
It may be a good idea to read and understand a post BEFORE you rubbish it, then you can avoid these "silly little arguments" .
I see no point in continuing this exchange so i'll leave it there.

[johncsimpson] 06/6/2012 20:24

Colva re your post 84 above.

I thought it best not to reply but . . . . OK. This has now developed into a silly little argument re what you say you meant and what I read and how I interpreted it. So looking at your post(s):

On yorgi's board, you said in response to backmarker:

backmarker ,

Yes you're right, i assumed (wrongly) that the vertical line was midnight 31st May but looking at it again it looks like midday 1st June so yes the convergence is the following day , which would now be wednesday, so Fingers and johncsimpson both have the 6th June as a key date.

Then you said in post 74 on this thread after I took you to task:

johncsimpson,

I'll try and explain this as simply as i can , Re. Fingers' chart, the vertical line refered to in my post on the other board is the thin blue vertical line ON THE CALENDER ,the one marking the end of May and the start of June, not the small white line marking the convergence.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ok, so if it wasn't the small white line where the convergence takes place that you were referring to but was the thin, blue end of the month line - would this thin, blue end of the month line not have been at midnight 31st May (which, on the one hand, you said in your post to backmarker (above) you'd assumed 'wrongly') or was this thin blue line marking the end of May at 'midday 1st June' - as per your same post to backmarker above?

Forgive me, but re the end of May and start of June - would that not normally have been at midnight 31st May? Nope. Can't be that coz you've already said (re the 'line') that you assumed that 'wrongly'. So if you WERE talking about the line as being the end of the month, why have you said in the same post that the line occurred at midday on the 1st June with the convergence being the following day 'which would now be Wednesday . . . the 6th June'?

In your own simple words please explain the midnight and midday concept as relating to the end of the month and how the 6th June follows the 1st.

[colva] 06/6/2012 16:46

johncsimpson,

Your decision not to respond to post no.74 speaks volumes of your character.

[johncsimpson] 06/6/2012 16:10

Bid now up as high as it's been all day in the 310 area

[jonnib] 06/6/2012 15:35

I agree too. Nearly every other stock on aim has been hit hard these last 3/4 weeks and this has stayed around the £3 mark keeping the recent gains. Good sign in my opinion

[yorgi] 06/6/2012 14:32

At last we are moving forward, dawning on those wanting to get in before the launch that we are getting very close now :-)

I'm inclined to agree with Jeffian but how much of a spike or rise remains to be seen and how much other information is released in the way of sales of both Hylas 1 and 2 and revenues from Hylas 1 will be important.

[johncsimpson] 06/6/2012 14:25

Still a little bit on the cusp but despite sells being slightly ahead of buys there's some evidence of strengthening.

Added: I'd like to see some buys going through at 320 . . .

Added at 15:55: a lot of sells gone through this past hour but indicators still looking strong and the price is still holding in that 303 / 310 area.

[johncsimpson] 06/6/2012 10:44

superg1 - good morning. It says in your header 'Please feel free to post comments here'. Might I ask if you have any objections or comments to my posting here?

[superg1] 06/6/2012 09:37

Buy well

Just popped over as I can see the thread is in use. I don't follow AVN and haven't for some time, but will add in the chart etc

[colva] 06/6/2012 09:31

fingers ,

Thanks for the update.

[colva] 04/6/2012 18:22

johncsimpson,

I'll try and explain this as simply as i can , Re. Fingers' chart, the vertical line refered to in my post on the other board is the thin blue vertical line ON THE CALENDER ,the one marking the end of May and the start of June, not the small white line marking the convergence.