We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Probiotix Health Plc | AQSE:PBX | Aquis Stock Exchange | Ordinary Share | GB00BLNBFR86 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 7.25 | 4.00 | 8.00 | 7.65 | 6.00 | 7.25 | 50,000 | 16:29:31 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
15/10/2024 08:08 | Having said that , despite the positive news here, I suspect the recent buying and share price appreciation may be orchestrated to pacify shareholders before any vote. | pj 1 | |
15/10/2024 07:57 | Opti tanked Sbtx tanked Raises No complaints? | putinaire | |
15/10/2024 07:56 | The share price crashed mainly as it was listed on an unsuitable market as OPTI could not fund any growth to PBX itself. Note shreholders bailing out of PBX as soon as the lock in ended. It matches the bailing out at OPTI. And the common denominators are......? OHara is in breach of contract, the one he instigated. OPTI has ''crashed'' just as much but you make no reference to that? Why not? | pj 1 | |
15/10/2024 07:51 | Opti said they were surprised with the timing of the raise. Not that there was a raise So, why were they not complaining about price tanking and no news? Was the tank OK if Seneca got it? | putinaire | |
15/10/2024 07:40 | Looks like SOH has lost the plot to me. | pj 1 | |
14/10/2024 08:42 | It could work out as they need liquidity too. Not sure how pricing works with a switch to AIM if wash price up here for selling there? I believe they say its not on the cards but i doubt that | putinaire | |
14/10/2024 08:40 | Want even better luck trying to sell it. Id say any sell liquidity is reserved | putinaire | |
14/10/2024 08:25 | Someone after stock... good luck with this liquidity.. if they remain keen we could see a sustained rise here | trotterstrading | |
11/10/2024 19:27 | Moving up a bit | m4rtinu | |
09/10/2024 18:34 | OPTI clearly flaunting AIM regulations. Those wanting this listing on that Market are in la-la land. Neither are fit for purpose. | pj 1 | |
08/10/2024 10:38 | Good products? Most end up on lse because they got nowhere private...or at least others didn't so plc was only option for money | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 10:33 | PJ, good points. TBH I'm pretty much uneducated re business, investment, but like following debates online. And as you suggest, on AIM etc, CEOs in the main take too much and are not slow at coming to shareholders for salary top ups. Often seemingly great products but poor, often devious management. | m4rtinu | |
08/10/2024 09:19 | Not stall a play rise. Different. Can walk share price up washed. But liquidity for selling later, needs to be out | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 09:18 | X amount monthly is OK to subscribe here but I think before the main play, O Hara needs to be completely out of it by name re not a NED etc. Out. . It's just deadweight name now for research by others. So is opti as a holder re sbtx history but bearable. O Hara's name will stall the bags though | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 09:12 | This will get distrubuted at a quid per share one day. I doubt it reflects business. More like retirement. Aquis ideal for that purpose over time . Or if required faster, shifted to aim at a much higher price Ive no issue paying current costs to build it But it's only because I want to profit from greedy knuts rather than backing potential 😂 | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 09:08 | Personally i think O Hara always backed it and stabbed old mates. Re knew about it His final retirement payment is here and he surely knows by now, his name is mud? Csnt do much for SP Also he knows what old mate funds will do re sell into everything This suits him for retirement. Everything isn't always as seems | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 09:02 | The new holder was your only chance of not getting minced for others gain. Else it was just going to be the usual backers from opti and sbtx . Well that would have been coffin ordered. Fact as is written in market Any concerns re a different holder are ill Founded in performance hopes | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 09:00 | Very simple. Opti and sbtx have annihilated longer term PI holders How can steen do worse? Impossible. So let him at it | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 08:59 | Opti was the poor behaviour They had no valid eeason to complain unless.... Other plans.....? Thought this was a separate company? | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 08:57 | Company needed cash. So, tell me, what was different to an opti or sbtx raise? Don't say a mate. That will get drilled at the other two | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 08:56 | Don't see issue with the board here. Standard raise.m? No different to opti or sbtx The only issue was others didn't get to choose who so they could make money on the side from it Pretty obvious | putinaire | |
08/10/2024 08:45 | It looks to me this should be cash flow break even next year unless they increase staffing. On fundamentals its cheap on many metrics, its a shame about the conduct of all the Directors involved, including NED's. | pj 1 | |
08/10/2024 08:36 | Yeah. If we could npt buy and make stacks snyway , be great | putinaire |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions