We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supply@me Capital Plc | SYME | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0005 | 2.64% | 0.01945 | 16:35:25 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02 | 0.0192 | 0.02 | 0.01945 | 0.01895 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| SOFTWARE & COMPUTER SERVICES |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 18/5/2024 20:40 by thanatos abysss From nutter not long now paulSYME investors are nutters. They're all self-obsessed, delicate, dainty, insecure little souls and absolute psychopathic f##kwits. Every last one of them!?" |
Posted at 18/5/2024 09:33 by thanatos abysss But not long now paul calls the rampers as followsSYME investors are nutters. They're all self-obsessed, delicate, dainty, insecure little souls and absolute psychopathic f##kwits. Every last one of them!? |
Posted at 18/5/2024 07:05 by nobbygnome You keep on living in your fantasy world PPE.Meanwhile I will remind everyone here what you thought of them when you wrote the missive below a few months ago. Hypocrisy is the word which comes to mind….. SYME investors are nutters. They're all self-obsessed, delicate, dainty, insecure little souls and absolute psychopathic f##kwits. Every last one of them!?" |
Posted at 17/5/2024 07:21 by nobbygnome So PPE the obvious conclusion that they couldn’t raise any more through the bucket shop at this lowly price is not likely. I despair at the naivety of SYME investors….esp |
Posted at 16/5/2024 07:52 by ianindenial Reminds me of the four? High net worth investors RNS’d to invest in Syme, which turned out to be a CLN. Do you think these investors ever existed? |
Posted at 24/4/2024 13:23 by pwhite73 With 62 billion shares in issue why have they not proposed a consolidation to attract 'institutional investors'.Because any due diligence by any institution would reveal the company has absolutely nothing in the way of a business. The only investors they can attract into this Ponzi scheme are Rodney Trotters who enjoy holding squillions and squillions of shares, so one day when the stock hits 1p they'll all be millionaires. |
Posted at 14/4/2024 07:30 by nobbygnome To remind SYME investors what PPE said about you around 7 months ago….and now he is one of you. What a weasel he is….‘SYME investors are nutters. They're all self-obsessed, delicate, dainty, insecure little souls and absolute psychopathic f##kwits. Every last one of them!’ |
Posted at 27/3/2024 03:48 by extrader Hi ppe1,.. (1) Unfortunately you have not added any detail. For example you simply quote £40m raised but not spent.. (2) Yet what has been the estimated costs to date for getting SYME to the stage it is at...people, property, legal, advisory costs etc etc..., (1) The TAG Concert Party took out £ 40million for themselves in a (barely mentioned) Vendor Placing that ran concurrently with the RTO that provided SYME with £ 2.2m in working capital to grow the business. From the 23 March 2020 'Commencement of Dealings' RNS .."In conjunction with the Acquisition, the Company has raised £2.24 million, before expenses, through the issue of 331,604,094 Placing Shares in the Company at a price of 0.68 pence per share to certain investors ("the Placing"). A total of £42.18 million of Ordinary Shares were placed through the Placing and Vendor Placing with institutional and other investors..." Were you (a) not aware of this ? or (b) were you being deliberately misleading ? (2) No need to look for 'estimates', take the numbers yourself from the accounts! HTH |
Posted at 25/3/2024 13:08 by paul planet earth1 Great investment choice nobbygnome with MIN only down 99.37% and you have the audacity to criticise SYME and its investors!I have added a very pertinent summation from one commentator on the LSE BB regarding MIN's situation. Minoan Group plc LON: MIN OverviewFinancialsCo 0.62 GBX -98.38 (-99.37%)all time 25 Mar, 10:51 GMT • Disclaimer lukehere Posts: 872 Price: 0.725 Strong Sell RE: Gamblers12 Mar 2024 13:00 There is no (Minoan) land, no registerd lease, no footprint, never mind any value; just an ever increasing number of shares. There is however a consistent failure to deliver which can be set alongside an interminable chain of RNS's , mostly falsely claiming that promising developments were imminent. Investors in Minoan have been patently and persistently misled. Why should 2024 prove any different ? |
Posted at 19/1/2024 19:17 by 88888ab Nobby. No disrespect to your sir.I'm clearing saying. You're stating the market cap is bonkers. Ok that's your point of view. Fully respected. The market cap is only if all the 61 billion shares was sold at that particular price. So I don't really pay much attention to it. Its the share price I look at. Then obviously your requiring the share price to be lower at responsible price. Fully understand. Buts that's your view, and respect that. Therefore, if the share price falls. Gives more shares for your buck the saying. But as the share price falls. It's only going to probably issue more shares to try attract more shareholders. Dilution. Fund raise. Lowering my investment. A reverse spilt consolidation. Nothing changes. Just the share price. And less shares on offer. But my investment value is still the same. And the share price then looks better to try and attract investors. The price will either improve or not. Nobody knows. Who wants more shares on offer to buy. Is there not enough as it is. 61 billion. Unless 100 billion. Would you imply to say then the value of the company market cap would stay the same roughly or not?, but a lower share price. So its not dilution you want? That's up to every individual investor to choose. . Personally preference. When to buy and how many. Most investors buy into a company as it growing with revenue. So until SYME prove to me as an investor. Its profits are up. I would buy on scalling up. Dripping feeding my investment. With caution how many I purchase. Not lower wanting more. Everyone for their own preference. If buying at a low Its speculation that it may hopefully turn a corner and grow. A punt a gamble it will come off. Buying loads of shares. More profit. Personal preference again higher risk more rewarding. That's entirely up to everyone and their decision. The lower the price creates more risks to me as an investor. Sorry. So why would I want my investment share price lower not higher? If I was a trader. I buy more shares piping it. In and out. And obviously want the price lower so I'm on a lower leverage by a brokerage % profit if its bull running 20% or short selling it. cfd. Stating to my experience, it's more a traders share than investors share this moment in time. Until revenue or injection from say institutional investors. il sit on the side lines with caution waiting. And see if my investment grows or not Everyone makes their own investment decisions. And should understand the risks. And respect their decisions. Regardless if they are a gerbil or not. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
