Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Quadrise Fuels International LSE:QFI London Ordinary Share GB00B11DDB67 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.175p -1.45% 11.875p 11.50p 12.25p - - - 1,014,902 16:35:20
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Oil & Gas Producers 0.1 -4.3 -0.5 - 102.39

Quadrise Fuels (QFI) Latest News

More Quadrise Fuels News
Quadrise Fuels Takeover Rumours

Quadrise Fuels (QFI) Share Charts

1 Year Quadrise Fuels Chart

1 Year Quadrise Fuels Chart

1 Month Quadrise Fuels Chart

1 Month Quadrise Fuels Chart

Intraday Quadrise Fuels Chart

Intraday Quadrise Fuels Chart

Quadrise Fuels (QFI) Discussions and Chat

Quadrise Fuels Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
16/1/201823:11Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future40,923
21/12/201717:57Thread for Sillies2
04/7/201718:39Quadrise Fuels... The Next AIM Disaster? 107
02/12/201422:26Q&A's2
14/8/201408:12Quadrise Fuels, Reference only thread16

Add a New Thread

Quadrise Fuels (QFI) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
2018-01-16 16:20:1811.9030,0003,570.03O
2018-01-16 15:54:5812.099,6611,168.01O
2018-01-16 15:45:0212.154,132502.03O
2018-01-16 15:38:2511.9250,4576,011.95O
2018-01-16 15:33:1111.91160,00019,056.00O
View all Quadrise Fuels trades in real-time

Quadrise Fuels (QFI) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
16/1/2018
08:20
Quadrise Fuels Daily Update: Quadrise Fuels International is listed in the Oil & Gas Producers sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker QFI. The last closing price for Quadrise Fuels was 12.05p.
Quadrise Fuels International has a 4 week average price of 10.55p and a 12 week average price of 3.50p.
The 1 year high share price is 15.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 2.40p.
There are currently 862,204,976 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 1,516,788 shares. The market capitalisation of Quadrise Fuels International is £102,386,840.90.
01/12/2017
18:38
brookemia: WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dear,REDACTED I am in receipt of your letter CGC/NCM/109419.Y049258, and note it's contents contained therein. REDACTED Regarding personal attacks "Snouts" at the trough is factual, and if their sensibilities have been offended then one asks should they be Directors of a Company, with such sensitive natures? I know that-from other Board posters comments-that I am not the only poster to write to them, and receive no meaningful replies. Perhaps- as you point out in your letter, concerning emails to Investor Relations-if they responded, they would not get so many asking for progress. Instead they practise The Mafia Code of Silence-The Omerta, and this gets Investors-the people who pay their salaries-irritated! Why do you think that some offered a token Salary reduction -( to be uplifted at a later date-subject to satisfactory PERFORMANCE) which I might add, can't be questioned/substantiated by shareholders?-after pressure from Shareholders due to their inefficacious performance? You say and I quote under Market Regulations: "Timely communication of accurate information to its shareholders and potential shareholders is of great importance to the board of directors" Really, where is this evidenced please? You state "it has come to our attention, that since April/May 2017 I have been engaged in a course of conduct, without limitation, in approaching in direct dialogue with third parties" If emails are "direct" dialogue, then guilty as charged, in the absence of "Timely communication of accurate information to its shareholders and potential shareholders is of great importance to the board of directors" I have posted information from our "partners" which has either been held back intentionally, or is/was of such importance the Board saw it necessary to secrete. This information-sent to me by The Energy Ministry" of KSA was already in the Public Domain, do you seriously think they hadn't told anyone? As soon as it was sent to me it was already Public knowledge, what had QFI to hide? As far as "Commercially sensitive Information is concerned"  and The BOD's conduct is concerned, please read the Front Page of the attachment, if you do not have the time. let me enlighten you: "Looking forward, and poised to migrate to Commercial revenues during 2017" Where are they ? "Substantial progress in 2016. 2016 has been a definitive year for QFI(really), significant progress has been made in our core marine and power generation projects" Where? Maersk have cancelled and we-perceptibly-are no further forward in Power Generation KSA MOU signed, major "production to Combustion" trial, expected to commence in 2017-not long to go then, ? Mission and Strategy: "In return we expect to earn a fair return for our shareholders that reflects the value we deliver to our customers and shareholders" Please tell me where this is evidenced? "Our underlying technology is underpinned by our relationship with Akzo Nobel and in working with Maersk, we have the world's largest shipping operator as a partner" This is on the website, and is demonstrably "UNTRUE" Marine: Commercial supply opportunity pending operations and LONO trial success contracts! Where? They would not even post the LONO result to its shareholders! "I should only post material that is public evidence! We had to find out that Maersk had cancelled their "Trial" with us from a Maersk meeting, not our BOD, where is their governance and honesty toward their shareholders? Power Generation: Anticipated commercial agreements in H1 2017. We have not been advised, and under AIM regulations an RNS should have been issued! Where is it? Trial commencement in H2 2017. Admittedly they have 35 days remaining in 2017, to announce this via an RNS ​Strangely enough, you mention iii Forum, where there tends to be a select number of posters, who in their seemingly unusual-like support of QFI BOD-​after posting that they have "met various Directors​"203;-​continually "ramp" the QFI share against market and Investor rationale​. ​This,​is clearly evidenced on ADVFN,where there are many seasoned Investors, strange that other boards "seem" to be diametrically opposed in Investment strategies than some mainstream Investors on other Forums isn't it?​ Maybe the board in its entirety should be looking at these "meetings" Maybe, we shareholder,s should be looking at why the sensitive Directors need to protect their sensibilities by hiring not-inexpensive lawyers at OUR cost! instead of getting on with the jobs they were appointed to do, but have failed lamentably over the last TEN years or so! I shall desist from revealing this on ADVFN for 48 hours from 09.00 Monday 27th November in order that you may wish to consider this reply, and then pending your reply, I shall post on ADVFN the gist of your email, and my reply, in the pursuit of clarity and transparency. I am honest, and have integrity, however I do not like to be misled, REDACTED REDACTED A  nticipated   P  oised   E  xpected! words on the front page of QFI Website, the irony of the ACRONYM is not lost! Maybe The BOD should investigate the possibility of a share buy-back scheme to evaluate the confidence in QFI, I would be the first to sell! WITHOUT PREJUDICE
20/11/2017
11:47
sb: Brookaemia has shown what an idiot he/ she is ... and is now trying to spin it that he /she has achieved something ... errrr.... yes ..... the QFI share price has gone UP ... but at a cost to QFI and its shareholders to rebutt the BS and issue a RNS, and someone should be made to pay. The intention of his / her actions over the weekend is obvious from comment 39818 to the kreature : "Have fun on Monday my "short" friend" ....it was price destabilisation .... and so I hope the book is thrown at him / her ... Oh ... and learn to write English ... what-if ... anything-is ... I guess it's a second language wherever you are ... ? My Saudi source ... hahahaha... oh dear...
20/6/2017
19:07
brookemia: as promised: Alan Hall 10 Jun (10 days ago) to Mikkel.Elbek.L., stm Maersk and Danish PM Dear Sirs, I can only presume that my recent email, has not been fully investigated, as I have had neither a reply or courteous acknowledgement of receipt. I shall await your reply by Wednesday 14th June, and then shall escalate my involvement of The MEP's to the EU yours truly Alan & Wendy Hall ​Danish PM: 9/6/2017 Dear Prime Minister, I would draw your attention to the above-named collaborative, contractually-defined arrangement between The Maersk group, and Quadrise Fuels International. I shall be as brief as possible, some time ago in 2016, Maersk approached QFI for them to conduct a trial on board The Seago Istanbul, to trial a new ground-breaking emulsion fuel, which if successful would be an innovative fuel with great benefits to the environment and to marine shipping Companies. All was going well, but with the financial muscle and power that Maersk displays and uses, QFI were not allowed to disclose much detail, because of Non-Disclosure Agreements that Maersk have and continue to impose, rather excessively it is perceived. The vessel "allegedly" hit a buoy, although with modern technology/sonar/radar and on duty watchmen, this is rather surprising? Following this "collision", QFI were informed that the vessel was to go into dry dock, with little additional details as per Maersk's cloak of secrecy. QFI were subsequently advised in March 2017 that the trial had been suspended after remaining onboard MSAR had been consumed, DESPITE Maersk confirming that thus far The Trial was a success. QFI were subsequently advised that Maersk would only use compliant fuels from 2020, and that the use of MSAR along with scrubbers-which was/is the preferred option for many in the marine fuel and refining industries, that see the use of high sulphur fuel and scrubbers as the most economic option for 2020 IMO sulphur regulations. It is more surprising as Maersk have already installed scrubbers on some vessels. Also their intended use of Low-sulphur fuel would put them at a distinct disadvantage with their competitors. Maersk's actions decimated the QFI share price and have cost many UK/International shareholders, many thousands/hundreds of thousands of pounds in financial losses, with their unilateral action. I am not sure that this would be allowed to happen in Denmark, as there would be a public outcry. We were advised that Maersk would receive the Interim Inspection LONO reports by end of May 2017. Maersk also previously confirmed that they would work collaboratively with QFI to progress the commercialisation of MSAR to the wider global Marine Industry. I would be grateful, if you would seek assurances from Maersk, that this is still the case, given their contrarian views on the product, and also how they could address the financial plight of these unfortunate Investors, that have occurred, only because of the actions of Maersk. I would ask The MEP's if this question could be raised in The European Parliament as a matter of urgency on behalf of UK Investors. Thanking you Prime Minister for taking the time to read, this unfortunate, but avoidable situation. Hi (redacted)   QFI Director Cheers, and I shall keep to my word, however is it against the rules to just let me know if an MMU is in place either now/shortly, as to how could the trial take place without one? I shall, if, in receipt of a satisfactory answer, also postpone any escalation of MEP's involvement, which might be at the least-irritating. This is not an attempt at unethical behaviour (redacted), I assure you of that. I just need to know(redacted), if my investment is safe, along with my family and whether to-if possible-increase my holdings, in order to take advantage of any possible news uplift. Strangely enough The FT financial pundit gives a year-end share price of 29.75P, now, from where did he get that little nugget? Assuring you of my word kind regards Akzo Nobel/Danish PM/Maersk Public Relations: Dear Sirs, Would you please submit this to the correct department. Please advise me as a shareholder what are Akzo-Nobel's views on the way that Maersk have dumped QFI and Akzo-Nobel, in their public "divorce" of QFI and the MSAR Trial. They have decimated the Share price and nearly brought the Company to bankruptcy. They are holding out on The Wartsila Interim Report, having publicly stated that are not pursuing MSAR and scrubber options, having had the report for a week, and obviously in possession of the true facts, as they had publicly stated that- up to the mysterious "collision" with a buoy-the trial had been a success How do you feel- as a co-partner and renowned Company of good practice about this disgraceful behaviour by Maersk. yours truly Maersk/Danish PM/7 Eastern region MEP's: Dear Sirs, It has been a week since Wartsila have issued you with their Draft report and review. You were already in possession of most of the relevant facts as you have publicly stated that it was a success until The mysterious "Buoygate" affair, where- despite a modern ship with attendant sonar, radar, and watchmen- you were unable to avoid a "collision" and unable , surprisingly-given your massive resources unable  to continue with the trial ? You subsequently publicly "divorced" QFI pronouncing to the world that you would not be adopting MSAR with scrubbers as a viable way forward. This is despite contrarian views in the Marine environment, and the fact that you have installed scrubbers on some of your ships. How can you on one hand, say publicly, that you are contractually obligated to pursue the collaboration with QFI to a satisfactory conclusion, and on the other hand reduce our Share price to its knees, and destroy thousands of shareholder dreams and aspirations. I have made initial enquiries to MEP's, and in the absence of a courtesy acknowledgement form your Danish PM, and a satisfactory reply from yourselves, I shall escalate the involvement of British MEP's, as your usual "cloak of secrecy" persists, and your stranglehold and veto of QFI's ability to release news that might help us, prohibits QFI from any public positive announcements. I am not entirely sure of regulations in Denmark, but I suspect that this kind of censure would not be tolerated. yours truly Reply from Maersk 19th June Alan,   As previously stated we refer to Quadrise communication regarding MSAR – specifically on the receipt of the Interim Letter Of No Objection, I refer to this latest announcement on 8 June by Quadrise: http://hsprod.investis.com/servlet/HsPublic?context=ir.access&ir_option=RNS_NEWS&ir_client_id=4867&item=2816712567160832   Best regards Mikkel I have had calls from QFI-already stated-and they are not happy with my emails, I told them that I was not happy with their performance, and also the former and current Directors who have had made gains. I have tried, but a wall of silence and no reply from Danish PM or any Eastern region MEP, but Nigel Farage emailed me from Brussels, and said it was a legal issue and that we should pursue it from that perspective. I am at a loss now, but can only suggest pressure is piled on individually to QFI. regards Alan
15/6/2017
10:39
toby29: Kreature Well my hoped for reason is - see my post 37685 but I recognise this may be wishful thinking on my part. Might also be that Maersk are happy to see the QFI share price drift down to get the technology on the cheap and cut-out Quadrise completely. Would be rather controversial to effectively bankrupt a company and then buy it over but I'm sure they could dress it up to cover up the issue.
08/6/2017
11:09
brookemia: as previously advised, this was sent to Danish PM, CEO Maersk, 7 MEP's and Qfi, Captain Kirk. Please feel free and would appreciate it being forwarded to your own MEP's(just google) UK MEP's: Dear Prime Minister, I would draw your attention to the above-named collaborative, contractually-defined arrangement between The Maersk group, and Quadrise Fuels International. I shall be as brief as possible, some time ago in 2016, Maersk approached QFI for them to conduct a trial on board The Seago Istanbul, to trial a new ground-breaking emulsion fuel, which if successful would be an innovative fuel with great benefits to the environment and to marine shipping Companies. All was going well, but with the financial muscle and power that Maersk displays and uses, QFI were not allowed to disclose much detail, because of Non-Disclosure Agreements that Maersk have and continue to impose, rather excessively it is perceived. The vessel "allegedly" hit a buoy, although with modern technology/sonar/radar and on duty watchmen, this is rather surprising? Following this "collision", QFI were informed that the vessel was to go into dry dock, with little additional details as per Maersk's cloak of secrecy. QFI were subsequently advised in March 2017 that the trial had been suspended after remaining onboard MSAR had been consumed, DESPITE Maersk confirming that thus far The Trial was a success. QFI were subsequently advised that Maersk would only use compliant fuels from 2020, and that the use of MSAR along with scrubbers-which was/is the preferred option for many in the marine fuel and refining industries, that see the use of high sulphur fuel and scrubbers as the most economic option for 2020 IMO sulphur regulations. It is more surprising as Maersk have already installed scrubbers on some vessels. Also their intended use of Low-sulphur fuel would put them at a distinct disadvantage with their competitors. Maersk's actions decimated the QFI share price and have cost many UK/International shareholders, many thousands/hundreds of thousands of pounds in financial losses, with their unilateral action. I am not sure that this would be allowed to happen in Denmark, as there would be a public outcry. We were advised that Maersk would receive the Interim Inspection LONO reports by end of May 2017. Maersk also previously confirmed that they would work collaboratively with QFI to progress the commercialisation of MSAR to the wider global Marine Industry. I would be grateful, if you would seek assurances from Maersk, that this is still the case, given their contrarian views on the product, and also how they could address the financial plight of these unfortunate Investors, that have occurred, only because of the actions of Maersk. I would ask The MEP's if this question could be raised in The European Parliament as a matter of urgency on behalf of UK Investors. Thanking you Prime Minister for taking the time to read, this unfortunate, but avoidable situation.
07/4/2017
16:36
crippin24: maersk stabs pi,s inthe share price again.bouygate not continuing trial.scrubbergate .not using scrubbers.scrubbers have been a prerequisit of msar since the start .now maersk are not definetly going to use scrubbers.maersk not continuing trial share price crashes.maersk not going to use scrubbers maybe .share price crashes.if you posters can recall my other posts i definatly predicted that maersk would trump up any excuse to drop the share price{i thought it would be something engine related}i was wrong on the exact excuse .but the excuses are their.i also said maersk wanted control of qfi desperatly but as cheap as they can get it.can another report from maersk drop the share any more.do we realy believe that maersk will use most expensive fuel while their competitors use cheap msar.all the delays problems with the marine side of this fuel are maersk related maersk are the worst parners in the world qfi could have found to test msar.oh i forgot maersk came to qfi and offered their serviced.{that has turned out well hasn,t it}.my advice to bod dump maersk like they are poison.{because they are}i would feel more confident in qfi if maersk were totaly out of the picture and not allowed to have anything to do with qfi in the future,i believe maersk is buying as many shares in qfi as they can for a cheap take over.maersk will ruin qfi at the cost to the shareholders.i hope i am wrong.just my opinion.
10/3/2017
11:14
brookemia: QFI share price dropping ? Why, I ask, has there not been a decision-in view of the accident and close proximity to end of LONO- to make an interim assessment and say Yes the LONO has worked. We are-subject to mis/interpretation-over 75% done, so whatever has happened, has happened and is irreversible! The question is, if it was favourable then why has Maersk not said anything as they would gain a commercial advantage, or at the very least get royalties as per the tri-partite agreement? If it was unfavourable, would not Maersk say so, put it to bed and move on? One would have opined that Akzo-Nobel have a say as well as QFI, is Maersk so powerful-in this agreement-that they can order a complete news blackout
21/4/2016
21:39
argyll eagle: Brookies/Yodhaha's posts (read them in chronological order) a little one sided for someone purporting to "establish the truth" Pathetic schoolboy mentality. LOL Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 21 Apr 2016 - 21:57:19 - 32426 of 32429 Argyll Eagle Thank you for your reply, I shall invest in QFI, unsure about who my alter-ego is,but will defer to you as you are a self-proclaimed psychologist. Questions are asked to determine the truth and to separate fact and fiction, after all you have stated that one has to do one's own research and ergo, one needs to cut through the hyberbole expressed on both sides of the argument So to sum it up, QFI's problems have been caused by-in your words- by both naïve Directors and Investors. Have I got that right please ? One last question, are we to assume that-by your "The reality is that naive investors, who know little about investing and company appraisal, pile in and create a bubble"-you are a very skilled and successful investor (possibly unlike many other punters including myself). I would therefore welcome any advice from your good self as to timelines for share price increases in the immediate future so I might plan my strategy. Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 21 Apr 2016 - 19:49:12 - 32418 of 32429 kreature, you have pointed out the "calamitous" disparity in timelines issued by QFI, which are indisputable. How do QFI devotees answer these "FACTS" and what is their rationale please ? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 21 Apr 2016 - 19:22:10 - 32416 of 32429 pcjoe, I am simply trying to sort out the wheat from the chaff, Brian has been accused of being a Heretic and worse, and seemingly one of his "disciples" as you refer to him-is reluctant to answer my simple question, to restore balance. For clarity Argyll Eagle: 1. Did you get hoodwinked along with others by Brian? and were you complicit in encouraging others because of this subterfuge 2. Is he still part of The Forum, and if so, does he post? 3. Is there any truth in the fact that he has made his killing and done a Lord Lucan ? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 21 Apr 2016 - 16:39:18 - 32410 of 32429 AE, read your post 32374 thank you, but you did not answer my question, specifically-did Brian, hoodwink a number of you, make a pile and vanish? or is he still on "The Forum", which would rather negate the post about him hyping it up and scarpering! Please be candid as candid in your reply, as others have been Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 21 Apr 2016 - 13:26:27 - 32395 of 32429 lots of angst here, some desperate people, maybe overspent on QFI? Argyll Eagle, you have not answered my question regarding Brian (Bryan). Did he hoodwink you and others, make a mint and disappear, or is he still active please? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 21 Apr 2016 - 08:32:38 - 32387 of 32429 Argyll Eagle, thank you for your reply and it appears that there could be mileage in QFI, however it has fallen from its dizzy heights, you must agree. Is there any truth in the statement that Brian Bryan hoodwinked you and others on the Forum and cashed in his chips when he had made enough, and is he still on the forum please ? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 20 Apr 2016 - 22:05:42 - 32372 of 32429 TradeYodha, just read the interesting history behind Brian, who allegedly hyped QFI up, made a fortune and disappeared ? Argyll Eagle, is any of this true please ? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 20 Apr 2016 - 20:12:15 - 32366 of 32429 Argyll Eagle, as you are obviously an advocate of The Quadrise Forum, do you have any stated position on there please ? Also, if that forum is so worthy of your like-why do you post on here please ? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 20 Apr 2016 - 15:17:28 - 32345 of 32429 For serious QFI insight and discussion many shareholders now use a moderated forum which can be reached through the link below. Http://quadriseshareholders.freeforums.org/ Is this serious or a wind-up please ? Quadrise Fuels. Fuels for the future - QFI brookemia - 20 Apr 2016 - 11:53:37 - 32335 of 32429 Trade Yodha Your "correlations" do seem to-in the main-track the price of oil, well spotted. If Argyll Eagle is a psychologist then it is no wonder the lunatics are running the asylum.he is very disparaging, and obviously does not accept contrarian views. He must be of the anti-democracy school of analysts and counsellors
20/4/2016
15:46
tradeyodha: On that OIL correlation study, I think few people did not get it as expected. Let me clarify. It does not follow the ratio of the price they are suggesting. It is more about sentiment. While oil price has been going down, the whole sector including oil related projects, services, projects, jobs almost everything has been getting hit. Hence the investor sentiment has been going down too reflecting in QFI share price. Simple rule, whatever happens in a sector affects companies in it. Few sustain the pressure and survive while others perish. That is why every business keep their eye on their sector all the time. They are aware of it. Again, I did this study to show the sentiment of investors and its affects on QFI share price and its market capitalisation. QFI also admitted this: hTtp://bit.ly/1QmN9hC
18/4/2016
22:01
tradeyodha: What a retard! Does not even know which Oil price to check :-) "Imbécile spécial" And for QFI Share price, read today's trades. They are being manipulated for a bigger player to get out again. Sorry I forgot you can not read. You are Retired errr! retarded.
Quadrise Fuels share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:41 V: D:20180117 01:24:33