|Quadrise Fuels International
||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
|Oil & Gas Producers
Quadrise Fuels Share Discussion Threads
Showing 46926 to 46947 of 46950 messages
|Bite your tongue B - surely that is blasphemy and our dear CFO would never do something like this would he:)|
|Another successful 635,060 bowel movement into the cesspit ?|
|The target levels seem very clear on the chart, and I'd be disappointed for some of them not be broken in the short term, unless some bad news comes out. 14, 16, 18, 20. If it were to clear 20, we'd be off, and then I'd expect momentum buyers to come in. But that would take good news.|
|That's good - I think it is very important to keep some of these companies under the spotlight and boards like these have there rightful place in holding them to account. As regrettably the regularity authorities seem about as good as a chocolate fire guard in front of a finance - any many companies know this !
Have a great weekend to all and hopefully making a bit in the near future. Just off to London shortly to deliver some clothes that I have managed to obtain from a few suppliers for a children's orphanage in Ukraine. The big boys of M/S, Next etc are just not interested but a very small company has gave me 10 boxes- a wonderful gift fo those who really need help.
|Well, I bought in very speculatively this morning. Largely chart based decision, and looking for a revisit of the 21p level, as the story must be getting very near its make or break stage now. Nothing, not even the history of delays and disappointments have quite managed to kick it into the long grass.|
|I also hope QFI makes it. As I was explaining earlier, my deep skepticism is not to be taken as a desire for the company to fail (I was long here for a few months - years back). It is just that - skepticism that has grown exponentially over the last 3 and a bit years. No one knows what the future holds and because of its probabilistic nature I am following this closely with the explicit aim to make money (long or short) if the opportunity arises. Good weekend.|
|Hi Tongosti - quite agree many PI's are probably sitting on a portfolio of QFI that stands them very much higher than the current real value and I do have a great deal of sympathy with them. Many may have took the BOD at face value and trusted in their projections (I will be one amongst the few to say so).
I do believe some serious questions should have been asked along the way and the structure of QFI set up with various trust funds hidden in the background have not helped nor as some of the directors being rewarded with huge salary increases and gifted share options. And the AIM set up has not helped either.
I personally believe we are now nearing the end of the journey and hope it is successful not only for the other PI's and I will benefit myself financially a bit but to me and partly for the reason I was and still involved is the environmental issues. Not so much for me as I will not be able to enjoy its benefits I don't believe but may be able to set up a legacy to help with the work - but only if QFI succeeds that is.|
|TonyThe dichotomy between share price performance and repeated failed promises (over timelines from the management for years on end now) should tell anyone all they need to know before deciding to treat (at this stage) QFI with extreme skepticism or unconditional love. Each to their own.|
|An RNS Update on the active/inactive programs may help with the honest and open dialogue that is often typical of this bb. o/t and people should I hope at some point realise that the dow needs to take a day off and fall by 1%
A bit worrying? The next episode of Satuday Night Live should be interesting
|Hi Hotfinance , Over the years since I have been involved with QFI many PI have asked various questions and there are no specific ones which individually amounts to a major significance. Many could not be answered fully - in all probability due to confidentiality agreements and we have to realise we are dealing with extremely large corporations and we are very small.
And it is realistic to assume our two partners with Maersk in particular will keep things very close to their chest - until it suits their aims.
No I was referring to issues like we are nearly there over and over again and on the back of that many investors probably jumped in and too early (and that includes me - so not perfect) Its all about the timings as some said to me at a prior AGM. We have had questions asked about various trusts behind the scenes and generally some persons may be trying to build up a picture of the company has been set up for a few to gain tremendously at others expenses and dare I say stretched out for their gain not the PIs.
For me and its a personal thing with retrospect some matters could have been handled better with probably more open disclosure - BUT on the other hand may question if we were all told that ten years down the line (figure of speech) we would still be waiting would it have attracted the investment initially and gone a long while ago. I am for one still in and remaining so for several reasons but its my risk and not anyone's else's and would not like to sway anyone either way. All I would prefer is a honest and open dialogue with serious people who show an interest in the market and are not blatantly either pro or negative, lets have positive constructive criticism and form a balanced view.|
|Tony..what questions are unanswered by the board ?|
Absolutely right - there is nothing really green it all comes at a cost like the oceans now full of plastics, we have discovered PCB's from the 70s in the Pacific in the deepest parts and ships fuels is really horrendous as regards NO, particulates etc .
Anything we can really do to reduce this must be considered for all our benefits and i don't me its for generations to come. Unless we make changes we will have no planet to rely upon , and lessons have to be learnt. We cannot just jump in and make rash decisions but when we know we have a problem concentrate ALL efforts to remove and resolve.
To me i support QFI but not naively and do hope its a success. There are still many questions left unanswered by the board, its governance and mode of operation and some have done incredibly well financially that is now and the future also.
And if it is a success (eventually) will make money but is too late for me in many ways - but hopefully have played a small part in its success and the monies can be used in trust for others to carry on the work after me.|
|"...if it does work as it says on the tin but fails to get recognotion the planet as a whole will suffer and again i am not a "green freak" but we have to change before its too late."
Tony, is there really anything 'green' about burning heavy bottom-of-the-barrel refinery leftovers mixed with industrial wastewater, and the associated atomised PM2.5 particulates emitted into the atmosphere?
o/t White House Press briefing: htTp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbhz3XcNzGU|
|o/t thing is re donald, would you close your short positions on the dow and take the hit at this point, or would you hold out for some kind of market correction, or some other CNN surprise? I'm guessing that everyone is anticipating some amazing tax cuts, and waiting to sell on news? ATB|
|Ah am lastly, if one has been negative about the stock for years cate to check how that opinion has correlated with the share price?If you establish a high correlation between the two, then such posters are not to be considered "derampers" but are "in full sync" the only variable that really matters: Mr Market!To use your flawed logic, rampers who have been long arguing why Mr Market is wrong, do you think they're paid by someone for their half wit comments over the years?Think twice before you write pal|
|T - Easy to forget apparently so see below principles: - Name of the game is to make money- Money is made Long and Short- That's why public boards are attended from both shorters and longers- Whoever sports ideas that any single poster may affect the share price (bizarre but it's a free country) is at best ... naive (and very probably should save his/her copper coins considering the deep ignorance of the stock market game)|
|imv, they've consistently over-anticipated, over-intended, over-expected, and under-delivered......but still opportunities may arise to buy or sell. I'm happy to highlight the expected mid-2013 revenues if they ever happen. imo, ATB|
|Thank you and as stated previously have absolutely no issue with that and i really do like to hear informative conjecture and positive criticism as it does make a balanced view and that way investors can make up their own minds.
And i am not picking on anyone special - i just feel and probably many others if you do not like the product why stay ?
And if you do have a vested interest in de-ramping the share for your own gain or being paid to do so - just say so everyone would have more respect for being honest.
Again and i do not know certain parties may have suffered financial losses but that is the way of the market - you cant change it - just move on is all i am saying.|
|In simple terms would one or two of the writers like to explain why they continue to constantly barrage the forum with what may be classed as negative news every single day. Surely for those who may not simply like the share the board of directors or even the product itself or just a bad investment, cut your losses and move on its like a marriage if it does not work - dont spend all your life belittling, it gets boring. Simply walk away and concentrate your efforts on making money elsewhere rather than here it will only make you bitter twisted and more frustrated.
The longer you continue (and of course its your prerogative) to post adverse comments the more it looks like you are an agent with a vested interest to bring the share price down. If that is the case and again i have no malice as again its your right to do so - you would get more respect from others by saying yes i want to bring the price down because it suits me or possibly the people i work for or am being paid by.
For me i rarely post on here because of this and i have not written this to be sarcastic it destroys the ethos of what was a good platform.|
'The Mexican refinery based project proposal and associated contract terms continued to be the subject of extensive commercial, technical and legal review by PEMEX. An agreed project programme is anticipated for implementation in late 2012/early 2013.'|
|In this month.....
24th Feb, 2014 AD
' It is expected that this will be submitted by the Aramco team for budgetary approval before the end of February. The agreed intention by all parties is to have the fuel system designed, installed and operational to supply a power generation facility for the demonstration phase during Q4 2014.'
In this month.....
16th Feb, 2015 AD,
'QFI has arranged to meet with senior management in KSA during February. The intention is to confirm the programme in the current environment with a view to setting a defined timetable for the "production to combustion" pilot programme targeting completion during Q1 2016.'|
|but if Don Juan does something very stupid (for a change), a crash maybe closer than one may think!|