Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Kennedy Venture LSE:KENV London Ordinary Share GB00B830HW33 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 7.125p 6.75p 7.50p 7.125p 7.125p 7.125p 323,930.00 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Support Services 0.0 -0.2 -0.5 - 8.58

Kennedy Venture Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1026 to 1049 of 1050 messages
Chat Pages: 42  41  40  39  38  37  36  35  34  33  32  31  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/12/2016
13:01
solar energy production tied to lithium storage - ideal for africa i would have thought https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/26/morocco-poised-to-become-a-solar-superpower-with-launch-of-desert-mega-project
wrtmf
02/12/2016
17:29
... and kod busy in Mali. so that's 3 AIM companies chasing lithium in Africa. Weird though, where are the gigafactories foe e-vehicles (not in Africa)?
andrbea
02/12/2016
17:02
might be interested to know rem have taken a position in asx:aou, auroch minerals, a lithium explorer in namibia also. worth keeping an eye on their future drilling announcements, either via rem rns or via asx/hotcopper.
wrtmf
02/12/2016
11:17
cheers ridicule and I agree....not sure what not to like at the moment, but still very risky as you say due to fact there are few hard facts on forecasts. Can't take much for the company to sort a broker out to write one surely?!
qs99
02/12/2016
10:08
The share price is going to struggle with momentum without some firmer P&L information. I have heard that Tantalum is on a circa 30% margin - $8.8m x >.30= $2.64m profit pa. With only 120.46 shares in issue this equates to around 2.2p per share. Take a pe of 12, not unreasonable with the Lithium prospect not priced in, and we get a share price of 26.4p!! With many miners at this stage, further dilution would be an investment threat, but Kenv is on the verge of being cashflow positive with the key investors having skin in the game. Difficult to see the investment logic of those selling today, other than for a quick trading profit.
ridicule
02/12/2016
08:08
well IMO with that open, they said lots of good things?! DYOR anyone there care to report back@?
qs99
01/12/2016
19:05
be good to get some feedback if anyone is going please>?
qs99
01/12/2016
18:29
Is anyone on here attending tonight?
ridicule
01/12/2016
15:46
be interesting to see whether tonight generates any buying (or selling!) interest tomorrow....
qs99
01/12/2016
14:50
Cash flow positive in very near term, using cash to fund Lithium production, so I agree, why not do both. the piece missing is where is a broker forecast? What numbers are the board to be held accountable for? Any clues anyone? Happy to continue to hold as delivering to plan...IMO cheers
qs99
01/12/2016
11:15
The lithium is piling up as a result of the tantalite mining, seems sensible to do both to me...It's literally lying around, once equipment is installed, they may as well process and sell...obvious
sja123
01/12/2016
10:45
Hi rid He's jumping too quick to justify "value" in "lithium assets" whilst leaving potentially a good chunk of the unproven tantalum as a "stranded asset". Why not grow that cashflow first? Doesn't make sense. How much growth and how long does that stretch. He said 200 years' production, at 8.8mil/pa? His license is 25 years. So why not ramp up production? I would rather realize first how much the tantalum is worth. You are paying for a non-free cash flow business given it all gets ploughed into lithium exploration. It sounds promising but: A) I don't know still what the tantalum asset is worth, neither does he seem keen to prove it up. What are you paying for? B) I like a good capital allocator besides a prospective asset, basics of commercial success. He is growing the company's "accretive" value in the wrong way. And finally, I am not a fan of his cross holdings and other continual ventures, gold here, precious stones there, tantalum one moment, lithium seeker the next. Just my opinion.
citywired
01/12/2016
09:44
Looking good thanks for updates
qs99
01/12/2016
08:33
citywired Why would they not use cash to exploit the Lithium opportunity? Hard numbers are difficult to come by, but recent estimates are as follows: On reaching full production Monthly output 9200lb of tantalum concentrate Price per lb $80 =$736k monthly $8.8 million per annum This is a lot of cash and there are no plans to pay dividends. They also have 5 further tantalum mining sites in their sights, as well as some tantalum blending arrangements where radioactive tantalum mined elsewhere is blended with Kenv tantalum so that it meets the international radio active levels that are cleared for transportation. This is rare miner that exceeds expectations and I cannot understand where you are coming from.
ridicule
30/11/2016
16:21
Said all the right things, but didn't really give enough flesh. I am concerned about the strategy.. Why use cashflow to fund the Lithium project when I would prefer a full appraisal and valuation attached to the tantalum. Allocating capital away from the known asset is illogical given that's the current cash cow. Also didn't know enough about the exiting business but to do so at the valuation KENV got in at, I am suspicious. Maybe this is just a corporate career for the company to take all cashflows and gradually burn/pay out in director fees. Might think about it, but for the price to have moved +154% in 3 months is too rich a price move. I won't chase it with lingering doubts about management. Especially after last night's presentation, today was an immediate +17% share price move, not entering as liquidity is squeezed.
citywired
30/11/2016
13:47
Presentation from last night now on website, it's good, Li JORC resource intended H1, cashflow positive by Q2 as already intimated, no significant funding req'd (doesn't actually say none), lithium development to be funded from cash flow, Re-rate expected upon positive cash flow. Allays my fears of another lowball raise, happy with that. http://tinyurl.com/ho3zgwp
paleje
30/11/2016
11:46
Indeed. No doubt tw will plug if thinks a winner IMO... Looking very strong IMO this morning so far.
qs99
30/11/2016
10:07
It's changed its name 3 times since listing in 2006. Bad history back in the day. Cash cow for the ceos.
daybreakers
29/11/2016
20:49
Should get an update in Shares Mag this Thursday regards tonight's company presentation....Kennedy was flagged in the mag sometime ago as meriting a massive re-rate upon commencing production.....well, not only are they in production but they shall also be capitalising on the Lithium resource from Q1 2017.....Very pleased with the progress here....
sian
29/11/2016
10:28
4m traded!!
potential
29/11/2016
10:23
maybe the next lithium play is kod hTTp://www.miningweekly.com/article/kodal-expands-lithium-prospects-in-mali-2016-11-28
andrbea
29/11/2016
10:01
10p is where it should be right now expect a rise towards there folks!!!
potential
29/11/2016
09:57
Time from company formation to the prospect of full production is very short in mining terms, so hats off to the directors! Compare it to another lithium play, bcn, which has been on its Mexican site for ages (since 2010) and is still talking feasibility studies.
andrbea
29/11/2016
08:43
Just topped up a further 100k :)
potential
Chat Pages: 42  41  40  39  38  37  36  35  34  33  32  31  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:43 V: D:20161211 04:13:51