Geiger Counter Share Discussion Threads

[p1nkfish] 25/8/2014 14:15

then read this.
no competition to nuclear on this metric.

hxxp://theenergycollective.com/barrybrook/471651/catch-22-energy-storage

[p1nkfish] 25/8/2014 13:59

worth consideration.

hxxp://theenergycollective.com/rodadams/469956/why-radiation-safe-and-why-all-nations-should-embrace-nuclear-energy

[nw99] 21/8/2014 14:45

Uranium big rally play it here buy Geiger

[nw99] 19/8/2014 20:28

Shareprophets

[kenmitch] 19/8/2014 20:26

But why has the share price risen today?

[truthteller3] 19/8/2014 16:33

Well, well, the kraken wakes.

[p1nkfish] 24/5/2014 09:12

Japan finally about to start plants back up.

[p1nkfish] 07/5/2014 07:35

simple question, have the management here added value to the fund in excess of their cost to the fund?

drewz, any answers?

have they tracked at high cost or added value?

[p1nkfish] 06/5/2014 13:50

BS.
The management charge is too high.
Do you work for them?

[drewz] 06/5/2014 13:17

Do shut up now p1nkfish; we've all heard your grievances repeated ad nauseam.

Time to change the record and look for the positives here.

[p1nkfish] 05/5/2014 15:32

They asked for and got a change in remit to invest elsewhere. They did so and screwed it up. Ausgold - of all companies. Very risky, small and flaky.

They could have wound up then and looked to come back when the way was clearer.

They have conflicting interests and shareholders don't seem to come first.

First is the survival of their management of the fund to maintain fees. Doing what was best for the shareholder is not always what is best for them and they put #1 first.

[jimbo55] 05/5/2014 13:34

All they could have done would have been to short Uranium stocks in a size large enough to offset some of the losses in their long positions, and that assumes they could have borrowed in the size needed to do so. They would also have required a crystal ball to see the Fukishima disaster coming (remember that the reactor coolant failure issue with the explosion occurred over a weekend, and on the Monday morning, anybody holding Uranium miners took an immediate 30% or greater loss).

Remember that this is a trust that exists primarily to invest in Uranium miners.What should they have done to hedge themselves when their sector got sledgehammered following the biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl?

[p1nkfish] 04/5/2014 13:40

If you know the history you know they gave themselves the mandate to diversify. The feable attempt they made with likes of Ausgold was poor to say the least, some might say totally inept. They could have cut the management fee to help, they didn't because this is a gravy train.


New management needed or consideration of winding down and a return to shareholders.of whatever is left over.

Management are supposed to add value in excess of their cost. This is not an alien concept. They have not done so for years.

[jimbo55] 04/5/2014 06:05

So how do you think they should have extracted value out of an entire set of stocks that fell pretty much altogether, across the board?

[jimbo55] 03/5/2014 16:45

To be fair to them p1nkfish, the market for Uranium has been pretty naff since Fukishima. Nothing last forever though...

[p1nkfish] 01/5/2014 07:32

Cutting the 1.5% will help.
They have added ZERO value.
Low cost etf worth considering.
They can't forever point at the market.
Only time they decided to diversify to agold miner was Ausgold.
Look what happened there.

[peterbill] 30/4/2014 23:55

Thanks energiser

This does look like a low point for GCL ... I see that management have taken a pay cut ... wonder what the cash burn/debt rate is?

[energiser01] 30/4/2014 09:22

Peterbill,

You can get the latest from the monthly fact sheets @

but its only the top 5 unfortunately. You may have to go in via the ncim home page as there's a confirmation page on which you have to select an option on usually to confirm your interest.

dyor etc....

[peterbill] 30/4/2014 03:26

Found it ...

pages 22/23

[peterbill] 30/4/2014 02:39

Has anyone an uopdated link to the top ten holdings and %'ges?

Thanks.