We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Afc Energy Plc | LSE:AFC | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B18S7B29 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.80 | 4.08% | 20.40 | 20.30 | 20.70 | 20.75 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 1,211,701 | 09:15:07 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elec Indl Apparatus, Nec | 582k | -16.45M | -0.0220 | -9.34 | 153.36M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/12/2014 22:18 | meaning beeez? What is a major tick up these days? Is it 10%, 20% 30% or...? | holism | |
19/12/2014 13:43 | NB.... This line caught my attention....this is where the problem lies...whatever industry you are in the bottom line is cost and that its cheaper than your competitors nothing else matters. =============== “We have a relatively large shareholder base that has been very patient and now what they want to see is a return on that investment.” Key to that will be focusing on the technology in order to get the balance right between fuel cell efficiency, reliability and cost. ==================== ITM...yep...all going well great news....GC is doing a good job....I just hope Mr Bond can do the same here, I will be ditching these on the next major up tick that is for sure. | beeezzz | |
19/12/2014 12:31 | Posted on iii bb....arrrrrrrrrrrrr C&P www.oilbarrel.com/20 | beeezzz | |
19/12/2014 04:00 | bz you've got to see this, unless the moustache is in the way | norbus | |
18/12/2014 15:25 | Good!!!!!!!! thanks for clarifying that........ | beeezzz | |
18/12/2014 12:33 | No There is an RNS showing the 13% owned by RA's investment vehicle. I have not seen an RNS showing any shares owned by Shvidler, directly or though his investment vehicle? | 25october1969 | |
18/12/2014 11:59 | I think you mean RA investment vehicle.... | beeezzz | |
18/12/2014 07:19 | Since I know so little about the ways of the stock market, help me out and show me the RNS stating that Shvidler or his investment vehicles owns 13% of VLS | 25october1969 | |
17/12/2014 17:37 | 25oct...You believe whatever you like....but as far as I am concerned he has influence over 26% of the company, whether in fact is immaterial...start to understand the stock market it may help you. I agree RA holding is 13% as he states, his team mate also holds 13% through his investment vehicle. | beeezzz | |
17/12/2014 16:57 | if it was matched it would have been announced - my issue is with distortion of the facts, how they are interpreted is a totally separate matter | 25october1969 | |
17/12/2014 12:39 | 25October 1969 a 45 years old behaving like a child thumbing his nose ; has it occured that Roman investments through Evrington is usually matched by Svindler ? whether it is 13% or 26% how does it alter the fact that investors have been taken for a ride? | norbus | |
17/12/2014 09:18 | beeezz - why the lies, RA does not hold 26% of VLS. Check the facts and get it right before posting =13.11% | 25october1969 | |
15/12/2014 08:53 | Says nothing about me. | new tech | |
11/12/2014 17:00 | bz I see PHE succumbing to gravity after some excessively aggressive punts to push the share price up the day they RNS's; Says a lot about new tech and the bunch driving pump and dump | norbus | |
10/12/2014 16:29 | It is therefore in their interest to facilitate whatever the Board want to achieve. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, That was never the intent; They are cheating and would love to see a group of activists hammering the NOMAD; Cantor Fitzgerals, a rich firm, is in with ACTA ACTA CEO just resigned, and the board as a whole sprayed dream dust over investors which should have been checked by NOMAD | norbus | |
10/12/2014 15:27 | Yes, I understand this, Nomads are paid by the company board, not the shareholders, while technically they are acting for the shareholders this is only true where the shareholders are the majority owners and therefore the ones who can pay them. They don't act for the small shareholders nor do they represent their interests in any way, they are on the payroll because of the Board. It is therefore in their interest to facilitate whatever the Board want to achieve. | hereford29 | |
10/12/2014 15:14 | Jam....Lanstead....D | beeezzz |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions