Westminster Share Discussion Threads

[misty12] 27/5/2016 11:21

Where did they say that?

[someuwin] 27/5/2016 11:18

They made it clear yesterday no immediate need to restructure. i.e no placing needed. Therefore they must be confident of securing alternative funding.

[misty12] 27/5/2016 11:06

Well just back. I've been thinking about the remarkable timing of yesterdays RNS. Now I might be cynical in my old age but that RNS really did save this companies bacon. Now today following the RNS just now, Darwin out? It just all seems a little to "well timed" don't you think. If this Co goes on and actually converts this latest ramp RNS then so be it, well done BOD. If on the other hand they are still empty handed in a few months time then I think an investigation is called for into these RNS content over the years and how share price Angel sign them off? ALL IMO
Critical by the way that the share price remains above 10p. Otherwise the ugly head of capital re structure will be back and share price will plummet

[alphapig] 27/5/2016 11:04

Panic, yeah I realise that, just referring to the par value of the shares @10p.

[panic investor] 27/5/2016 10:54

it takes time to sort a placing out, during that time the price was a lot lower.

[graham1ty] 27/5/2016 10:39

I wonder if Darwin managed to sell every share they had yesterday. Sorry to be cynical, but with that volume they should be right out now. So convenient.......

[alphapig] 27/5/2016 10:38

If they can get a placing away at 10p then it's good news benson all round, wtfdik!

[graham1ty] 27/5/2016 10:33

20p, 30p almost there........

[bernieboy] 27/5/2016 10:17

Couldn't buy on that dip! :@

[patientcapital] 27/5/2016 08:42

Cashed mine in yesterday. GL.

[kreature] 27/5/2016 08:41

' the receipt of this Letter of Intent is an encouraging step '

--------------

does that sound conclusive to you ? I would have thought that a LOI would be more than an encouraging step. More of a giant leap

[dark energy] 27/5/2016 08:40

Usually on Friday punters cash in their chips. Good practice really.

As previously said $35m is revenue.

Main concern now is funding

[dark energy] 27/5/2016 08:35

look like 8p is coming. MMS testing if lurkers are around. happens all the time

[yosemite sam666] 27/5/2016 08:22

look soon will be even and whoosh

[yosemite sam666] 27/5/2016 08:21

Tree-shake over up we go

[dark energy] 27/5/2016 08:18

Yes it's revenue not profit, but there's room for expansion.

I think it's placement coming we need to wait for funding details

[kreature] 27/5/2016 08:17

30m revenue rather than profit, & anything 'up to' 25 years, with 'hurdles' to overcome first - & contract 'in due course' - So until this becomes clearer, it's probably worth highlighting that, 'there can be no certainty as to the timing or final outcome of contract discussions'. imo etc good luck

[dark energy] 27/5/2016 08:13

I took profit at 12.75+

Got lucky. I did not like MMS games possibly forward selling

[dark energy] 27/5/2016 08:12

Looks like massive profit taking

Placement at 7p-8p in punters mind

[someuwin] 27/5/2016 08:02

Never mind the location.

Focus on the £35m per year for 25 years.

[yosemite sam666] 27/5/2016 08:01

here we go 15p coming on the way to 20p

[yosemite sam666] 27/5/2016 07:58

I always thought Libya was in North Africa (Maghreb)

[kreature] 27/5/2016 07:54

Hence the 'hurdles' - If you consider a possible security charge of 25USD per disembarking pax then you're probably looking at a small int airport of a few million, not 78m in my opinion.

[yosemite sam666] 27/5/2016 07:48

Shall I rephrase it to you " High probability it's Doha". Is that better?

Syria or Libya? C'mon. These 2 countries do not even have any govt in control.

[kreature] 27/5/2016 07:46

"It's QATAR, Doha new International airport."

------

That's a statement of fact. How can you be so certain?