Westminster Share Chat (WSG)

Share Name	Share Symbol	Market	Type	Share ISIN	Share Description
Westminster	LSE:WSG	London	Ordinary Share	GB00B1XLC220	ORD 10P

	Price Change	% Change	Share Price	Bid Price	Offer Price	High Price	Low Price	Open Price	Shares Traded	Last Trade
	+0.75p	+4.29%	18.25p	18.00p	18.50p	18.25p	16.75p	17.50p	741,959	15:54:18

Industry Sector	Turnover (m)	Profit (m)	EPS - Basic	PE Ratio	Market Cap (m)
Support Services	4.4	-2.0	-2.5	-	20.67

Westminster Share Discussion Threads

Showing 14326 to 14346 of 14350 messages

Chat Pages: 574 573 572 571 570 569 568 567 566 565 564 563 Older

Date	Subject	Author	Discuss
20/7/2017 17:22	Come on, let's have the contract...	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
20/7/2017 15:52	come on 19p	madmonkflin	Read Full Thread Reply
20/7/2017 15:47	Chunky buys coming in	harleymaxwell	Read Full Thread Reply
20/7/2017 10:33	Well, at the time of the AGM they were 'standing by' to fly over. Seems like an awful long 'standby'.	2magpies	Read Full Thread Reply
18/7/2017 09:51	LSE says it is definitely NOT Oman. Believe what you want !!! I think it is Heathrow	graham1ty	Read Full Thread Reply
17/7/2017 10:40	Uk follows USA and bans smartphones and laptops from cabin, surprise surprise UK doesn't ban any of them from Oman airports, UK building huge presence in Oman, it's not coincidental that govt ministry levels have been involved in our negotiations with middle Eastern company..UK is investing $3b in security and defense in the gulf states I bet vast majority is going in Oman..Vast majority of Omans defence imports come from UK...Imho	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
17/7/2017 09:35	not looking likely in the price, needs a kick up the ....	madmonkflin	Read Full Thread Reply
17/7/2017 01:52	hTTp://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mark-curtis/britain-oman_b_11426144.html UK have strong ties with Oman, Shell has alot of oil assets in Oman. I think its Oman, deal looking likely..	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
17/7/2017 01:46	hTTps://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-to-boost-defence-and-security-co-operation-with-gulf-allies Mrs May investing lots of money in gulf region, now we know why govt been involved in our negotiations.. 6 Gulf countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
16/7/2017 14:53	loobrush Rather strange for him to be going on leave, when few weeks before he said certain directors on standby to do "final negotiations" fairly soon, maybe he took holiday in the country involved.	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
16/7/2017 14:36	No, he's had a busy timw with and leading up to the agm, qualmed his doubtera yet again for the forseeable, and knows there is nothing immediately on the radar, that's how I see it	threeputt	Read Full Thread Reply
16/7/2017 14:13	On annual leave ? Is that just a red herring when he is actually in Oman ?	loobrush	Read Full Thread Reply
16/7/2017 12:16	News is PF is on annual leave till Wednesday, I just can't fathom he is on holiday when few weeks ago he said that they are on standby to go for final negotiations for ME contract.Tomorrow should be interesting...Imho...	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
15/7/2017 11:08	Graham1TY15 Jul '17 - 08:12 - 13104 of 13106 0 1 HH are invested because they cannot get out ! Anyone who took shares at 10p is still looking Ok, on paper, so if you cannot sell, it does not look too bad. ================================= that statement is a lol, institutions are here to make money..	neo26	Read Full Thread Reply
15/7/2017 08:40	Yes MOUS are meaningless but if you haven't worked in government you don't have a clue. This is how everything is, mou, letter of intent, and then years later a contract if you're lucky. Don't invest otherwise.	madmonkflin	Read Full Thread Reply
15/7/2017 08:17	Every single MOU has been exaggerated. East Africa MOU, Nov 2012, delay 56 months Asia MOU, Feb 2015, delay 29 months "New country" MOU, Oct 2015, delay 22 months East Africa 2 MOU, Dec 2015, delay 19 months MIddle east 1 MOU, JAn 2016, delay 18 months Border project MOU, Feb 2016, delay 17 months Middle East 2, MOU and LOI, March 2016, delay 16 months That "adds up" to 177 months of aggregate delays, or almost 15 years wait !! Just shows that the MOUs are meaningless, unenforceable, and give no guidance at all as to likelihood or timing of receiving any contract at all.	graham1ty	Read Full Thread Reply
15/7/2017 08:12	HH are invested because they cannot get out ! Anyone who took shares at 10p is still looking Ok, on paper, so if you cannot sell, it does not look too bad. Re contracts of this size, you would expect a performance bond of some sort. For a multi year, multi million contract that might even be £5-10m.....the kind of money WSG just does not have. In fact, if the Sierra Leone government had demanded a performance bond for the ferry, "just to show you can deliver on time, please put up a couple of million" then that would have paid out when WSG had still not delivered a service two years late. I think WSG ( why I "think", it is so obviously the case) have a history of sugar coating everything. So Lungi was going to be $150m over 15 years. Well, the first five years have produced about $25m about half the suggested level. The ferry was going to produce $300m over 21?years, yet it is two years late and the immediate take up appears to be negligible ( ok, over a very very short initial period). So all MOUs, LOIs have to be taken with a pinch of salt	graham1ty	Read Full Thread Reply
14/7/2017 22:52	I would agree with all these sentiments, I have to keep telling myself that these fairy stories simply never happen - but then I ask myself why are Hargreaves still invested. I'm not in currently having sold far too early, but I keep a keen eye, the stories that the airport is delayed until next year now give me comfort that it wouldn't be signed yet if at all, and that I may yet get another trade out of it, maybe on another fund raise	threeputt	Read Full Thread Reply
14/7/2017 20:45	Usually it would be highly unlikely to hand any meaningful contract over to a company like WSG with such a shoddy and weak balance sheet. Due diligence would require any company to be financially solvent so as to be in a position to run a contract. Just don't believe these contracts are anything more than MoU's or discussions at best.	owenski	Read Full Thread Reply
14/7/2017 18:54	2 Magpies, they are being charitable, supporting a bankrupt company that needs 20 odd fundraisings this decade, has to go to Wonga, has no other substantial contracts.	graham1ty	Read Full Thread Reply
14/7/2017 14:40	They could get the contract - but this is taking a long time. Makes one wonder why would a super -rich (one presumes) ME kingdom/sultanate give such a lucrative contract, for something so vital to its critical infrastructure, to WSG? Also, the Lt.Colonel has stepped down, I believe - why would he do that if the contract is supposedly 'nearly' there. Why not wait a bit longer and see it through, what with things being so close. Also, has not the FD also stepped aside? I could be wrong.	2magpies	Read Full Thread Reply

Chat Pages: 574 573 572 571 570 569 568 567 566 565 564 563 Older