Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[nellyb] 13/1/2020 11:03

loglorry, you were posting here at 0800 hrs and you are still here at 1100 hrs. why do you post so much on a share you do not rate? Isn't your day job suffering?

[schmally] 13/1/2020 10:57

On the contrary Nico, I think you will find that SG and dozens of other PI's will be significantly increasing their activity on this board to counter misinformation. No PI that I know has any spread bets or is leveraged in any way. There is however plenty of evidence to suggest that a very small minority of vocal non shareholders do hold spreadbets which are causing them a great deal of stress and discomfort. Why else would you and they be trolling this board if that wasn't the case.

Long term PI's have a choice of whether to post on here, whereas you, Log and others won't get paid and can't protect your exposure unless you continuously misinform to try and drive down the share price.

That's one hell of a depressing and stressful way to live a life, but if that's what floats your boat, then hey ho!

[pshevlin] 13/1/2020 10:56

The chart has been on a downward trend since July so I'm sorry Lucky you must be illiterate not to notice that. I suppose you will be saying it's fine when we are around 60p in March if the trend continues? The only thing that will halt this is news which seems a long way off at the moment.

[luckyorange] 13/1/2020 10:41

Nothing on there to read ade, all looks fine to me but I suppose you are talking today, longer term it looks fine to me? The weather looks grim though 🌞🌦

[1teepee] 13/1/2020 10:38

I'm sure Neil will draw us a bigger upward line soon.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 13/1/2020 10:38

NR needs to order lunch from a neighbourhood Chinese takeaway & post a photo. That should add an easy 10% to the shares.

[nico115] 13/1/2020 10:33

Is it obvious to anyone else that superg has a very long spreadbet in VRS and is about to get stopped out ?? @desperateposts @rampingevery10minutes He promised not to post here any more yet he's posting more than ever !!What a horrible desperate arrogant fella

[adejuk] 13/1/2020 10:28

the chart is grim reading
come on neill. finger out.

[pshevlin] 13/1/2020 10:27

Are you still dumping these Fest?

[pshevlin] 13/1/2020 10:19

How many people think 80p will hold here. I don't like the look of the chart unless some deals arrive pretty soon.

[evergreen8] 13/1/2020 10:14

Superg1

Thank you for such a clear and unambiguous definition of the reality of the difference between VRS and those selling dross. Excellent😊

[phoenixs] 13/1/2020 10:13

The problem which some have with Versarien is similar to those who deny that the global warming has to a large degree been caused by the burning and use of fossil fuels as well as the cutting down of vast tracts of our tropical forests.
They sent the science and skew the facts with untruths. Really sad but there are those who refuse to accept.

[grabster] 13/1/2020 10:05

We now have detractors criticising and correcting each other. Can't even agree among themselves.

[superg1] 13/1/2020 10:03

So the O and G deal may drop in this month.

At that point the nonsense is over.

The details of the expected demand is in news. It’s a game changer.

[superg1] 13/1/2020 10:01

The experts agree most of what is out there is junk, Manchester agree, the NPL agree.

That’s why there was a demand for standards. End users were being sold what they were told was graphene.

The definition of nano allowed them to call it nano materials.

The nano definition is under 100nm which is 300 layers. Multi-layer graphite does no works.

Performance of the full spectrum of graphene falls off a cliff when you head over 10 layers.

Thermal and modulus is different.

EG a piece of concrete a few mm thick can be snapped like a biscuit in your fingers. You can do that with steel. If you want the concrete to be thermally conductive then add some graphite which will also add flexibility.

Concrete relies on bulk for it’s strength. Even then with a decent hammer you can break it up.

Graphene has different levels of performance and it’s directly related to layer level, aspect and defect ratios.

There is no way you can separate GNPs to be all single layer other than microscopic fractions of a gram.

If you have one flake single layer at 10um on the lateral it’s the same weight as 1um 10 layers.

So you first have to separate then layer by layer, then remove the unwanted layers.

Hi yields re reduce cost. Talga claimed they could do 7000 tones in the future but the investor Warwick Grigor realised (too late) that it was BS. 97% plus of it is graphite and you have to separate out the junk which itself is an art.

[laginaneil] 13/1/2020 09:57

Good Moning J1nxed,

Without being offensive, I would have to take issue with you statement:

"..they (VRS)seem unqualified to actually produce commercial quantities?"

That would seem to conflict with the view from Airbus eh!

I can't see how not having written books on it or produced patents relates

to making money from the technology.

Just my view.

[tini5] 13/1/2020 09:50

Come on Tim, can't be that hard to find the quote for Barkan.

After all, I'm sure you've thoroughly researched everything to back up your posts.