Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[1teepee] 12/10/2019 12:55

It my uncensored thread btw

[1teepee] 12/10/2019 12:53

We need some new posters. I cannot see any of the text;)

[bbmsionlypostafter] 12/10/2019 12:42

As always with a fraud or share promotion, the zealots ignore the serious issues raised and resort to ad hominem attacks.

[dreamtwister] 12/10/2019 12:38

bbc ...click....electric cars..well that programe was pants !

[club sandwich] 12/10/2019 12:20

Alchemy. Good to see that my uncensored thread is serving its purpose by allowing people to post freely without worrying about censorship by PC Plod. Of course you are equally free to rebut. And of course Ricketts could confound all of his critics easily and at once by announcing a deal with BIGT or indeed a commercially-significant deal with anyone. To date he has been unwilling or unable to do so. It is hardly surprising that speculation of all kinds thrives in such a febrile atmosphere where mgmt keep saying they hope to deliver key events but never actually do.

[jimboau] 12/10/2019 11:51

Checkmate Lucian?

[alchemy] 12/10/2019 11:47

I can do ignore but rebuttal beyond me by miles.

[schmally] 12/10/2019 11:43

Shall we also focus on all your glorious business successes as well Timmy? I’m sure Britain’s budding entrepreneurs and business leaders are banging on your door for advice😂€514;

[jimboau] 12/10/2019 11:37

Clearly not as 'extensive' as Lucian's, lol.

[alchemy] 12/10/2019 11:37

Truly awful post on the "uncensored" thread. Should it be rebutted or ignored?

[schmally] 12/10/2019 11:32

Very healthy thank you Loggypuff. As a director of a SIPP company and having adopted a sensible long term investment approach backed up by extensive research, i’m Looking forward to early retirement, with or without VRS multi bagging from here. Thankfully I’ve always avoided over exposing my funds to single high risk investments that are difficult to recover from. Unlike yourself of course.

[philbyk21] 12/10/2019 11:22

Perhaps they could add and a company that is more than happy to develop your product even without any commercial pressure once the application has been improved

[loglorry1] 12/10/2019 11:01

My credibility is fine. How is your portfolio value?

[schmally] 12/10/2019 10:58

Keep on kidding yourself Loggyboy. You lost all credibility ages ago, so forgive me for not bothering to engage with you on any specific points.

[schmally] 12/10/2019 10:56

Keep on kidding yourself Loggyboy. You lost all credibility ages ago, so forgive me for not bothering to engage with you on any specific points.

[loglorry1] 12/10/2019 10:35

@AD the risk is that VRS is valued at 90p of which 80p is for the graphene business. So far after 4 years of collaborations and much fanfare of their wonder product almost none has been sold.

If Nanene turns out to be another one of Neill's failed products like his copper foam product then that premium will evaporate. I see he's already trying to pivot to Hexotene.

[loglorry1] 12/10/2019 10:25

@schmally as we know it seems nanene restacks back to graphite if left for any period of time. Hence the very low SSA of 45m^2. See tweet from Nanosteve for confirmation.

VRS have only very recently started banging on about master batches and polygrene. It's pretty unlikely they are experts with valuable IP. To start with they've hardly any staff working in this area and have a tiny R&D budget.

NanoXplore are the market leaders here with huge experience and multi tonne sales of graphene mixed into polymers. They own a large polymer supplier in Switzerland.

It's rather odd isn't it that VRS has apparently the only and best real graphene for sale and yet they sell barely any while others ramp up sales to levels thousands of times greater than VRS.

I see Club S on the other thread blaming NR for lack of sales. He's clearly all hot air and no sales like his buddy Patrick was (before he was fired for being indited with a securities fraud charge). However it's looking increasingly likely the reason Nanene isn't selling is because there simply isn't demand for it at the price point they are selling it at. Other suppliers have a better product at a better price point.

[1teepee] 12/10/2019 10:20

So is it 5000 or 6000? ;)

[superg1] 12/10/2019 09:51

At last some decent info to work on.

The key point was not to work with a graphene producer but one that understands the process start to finish and the expertise to advise re the best way to achieve outcomes an end user desires.

Near all in the most have just been graphene or rather graphite suppliers.

[matheus7777] 12/10/2019 09:37

Kipchoge breaks the two hour marathon barrier. Interestingly, the name of the event is the Ineos 1:59 challenge. Presumably the Ineos chemicals group run by Jim Ratcliffe, one of the worlds richest men and specialist chemical engineer, wonder if theres a link there somewhere

[luckyorange] 12/10/2019 09:36

But they NEVER cite Versarien, what's going on?

[hew] 12/10/2019 09:33

Adding to the plaudits for the Graphene Council presentation, a statement near the start put a smile on my face. Ahead of any specific mention of suppliers, after reviewing the various forms of material claiming the term "graphene" and the wide scope of applications, a slide stated:

"The primary factor is selecting a trusted and competent supplier that understands your application."

Three boxes to check in that sentence and it's the firm tick in each that brings so many major organisations into collaboration with VRS.