Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[cheek212] 05/12/2018 11:44

Lord Ricketts should be landing in about an hour so a quick freshen up and straight on the phone for a podcast!!!!! LOL.I think he deserves a couple of hours off and then he can get on with today's NGRAdvent.Gutted I can't make tomorrow nights inaugural meeting of the London Chapter of the Versarien Angels but hopefully the next one in the new year.

[jointer13] 05/12/2018 11:43

quality.

its the quality of our materials that has us at the forefront of this industry

its not just about the few layer, platelets, sizes. etc etc

its that final ingredient (coca cola recipe) and the finishing off that makes us unique....

we have no peers.

quality and prestige.

I reckon the likes of talga, xg, Thomas swan etc would have put a tender in to the cpi for this competitive process,and probably failed on the quality of their materials.

vrs won all they tendered for.


the tender for the cpi was based on quality.

quality wins through in the end.

"The evaluation of the tender was based principally on the quality and specification of the graphene to be supplied with additional marks awarded for price and delivery."

Versarien plc (AIM: VRS), the advanced materials engineering group, is very pleased to announce that it has won a single supplier competitive tender for the ongoing supply of nanomaterials, including the Company's graphene, to the Centre for Process Innovation Limited ("CPI"). The evaluation of the tender was based principally on the quality and specification of the graphene to be supplied with additional marks awarded for price and delivery.

[squire007] 05/12/2018 11:42

Off you trot then - BYE X

Love your 'target' and 'projected' 'reported' words pmsl ...

[loglorry1] 05/12/2018 11:38

@spid some of the collaboration agreements like the one with Haydale stretch back more than 3 years. Haydale recently announced the supply of Graphene inks. It's been reported that Talga supplied the graphene for these inks.

VRS claim to have very strong IP in the graphene ink market after the acquisition of Cambridge Graphene for just £175K (mostly in shares).

Why would Haydale not use VRS graphene?

Also on collabrations VRS never seem to give any updates on how things are going apart from glib comments on twitter by Neill that everything is wonderful (I think he's seen the lego movie).

In contrast FGR publish things like this on their BEST battery







----------
VRS have a fraction on the capacity, no graphene IPs in development and many collaboration agreements that haven't resulted in sales.

[ellissj] 05/12/2018 11:38

Re GNP's; it's laterals AND thickness that typically defines 2D v 3D 'graphenes.' Per proposed iso standards. Confidence in VRS here. Aimo. Dyor. Best ellis

[chumbo] 05/12/2018 11:37

A lot of Russian cars around again today.....

[squire007] 05/12/2018 11:25

Yes, your right. Plus it's bedtime other side of the world, gla ....

[squire007] 05/12/2018 11:24

Wonder who signed off those 2 deals you keep mentioning ;-) :-0. Lol
Would it be a graphene specialist lol. Wink Wink x

[jointer13] 05/12/2018 11:23

squire..no point in engaging liars,because all they will do is......

[tini5] 05/12/2018 11:21

Shouldn't you be helping Kevin over on the Haydale thread Tim? He's over there all alone.

Or is he the vanguard of your little group?

No need to respond. I can only see your desperate froth-flecked posts, albeit temporarily, when you spend coins on promoting them.

[loglorry1] 05/12/2018 11:15

Yes @spid sorry 3 year deal not 2 year deal.

Why do you think @superg makes up so much rubbish? He never supports his claims with links. Just the usual nudge nudge wink wink stuff.

I suspect he's trying to support the falling share price while at the same time selling down his holding.

[spid81] 05/12/2018 11:13

Hi loglorry.

Just need to correct you. FGR have a 3 year deal with the university of Manchester / GEIC for graphene and other 2d materials when they are available.

—---------

You do know that FGR are also tier one partners at GEIC and that Manchester University have signed a 2 year deal for them to supply them with graphene and no such deal is in place with VRS.

[johnveals] 05/12/2018 11:13

What we don’t know is how the 2 year exclusivity deal with the machine manufacturers is developing. I can’t see that being negotiated and not taken advantage of. The plan is coming together.

[pshevlin] 05/12/2018 11:09

Looks like the share price has succumbed to the general melee :(

[club sandwich] 05/12/2018 11:09

"Money is in the intelligence of VRS, and CS if you don,t believe that !!!"

very *intelligently* put...

so when are they going to start delivering money then? Because so far it's just been endless talk...

you looked at the share price lately?

[squire007] 05/12/2018 11:08

Proof ..... again pmsl !!! Look who is working with us, what base have you got lol

[johnveals] 05/12/2018 11:08

Fest - I never went away, I was merely resting ;-)

Still long, still strong.

[loglorry1] 05/12/2018 11:05

Shares now down 2% after yet another yawn MoU from China. I'm sure we'll get another breathless Vox podcast to pump them up a bit but looks like the excited puppies are losing steam here.

As Club says they need to deliver sales.

[loglorry1] 05/12/2018 11:03

@squire where is your proof that VRS supply better FLG than for example XG Sciences, or First Graphene. You do know that FGR are also tier one partners at GEIC and that Manchester University have signed a 2 year deal for them to supply them with graphene and and to my knowledge no similar deal was recently signed with VRS.

EDIT: NR has just tweeted to say VRS has a supply deal in place with University of Manchester. It's a couple of years old he says but provides no link to an RNS. He fails to provide any quantities or dollar value of any graphene supplied under this agreement. Why does Manchester uni go to FGR now if they were getting supplies from VRS?

EDIT: to keep him happy I've edited the above to say "and to my knowledge no similar deal was recently signed with VRS".

You do know that Nanene has a surface are of 45m2 per gram compared to up to 750m2 for XGSs products which by the way are being used by Ford Motors.

You do know that the reason Nanene has such a low surface area was justified by Neill because of some sort of post production step involving packing the platelets for shipping (oh come on why not measure before they are so called packed for shipping). His chief scientist Dr. Stephen Hodge remains silent on the issue though - make of it what you will.

You do know the Nanene tech sheet was changed (apparently due to a typo which lasted for months) where the min lateral size was lowered to 0.1um from 0.5um and the average was removed. We know from many scientific papers lateral size is very important when adding strength to polymers.

So where are your facts that show that Nanene is so superior to these other producers that it can sell at $100,000kg rather than an industry average of around $100?

[squire007] 05/12/2018 11:03

Spid, one correct word you stated ..... ' Planned' .... pmsl
And the product ??? Lol